northwesterntrains
|
|
« on: March 11, 2010, 10:36:32 » |
|
In the north we're hearing stories that the replacements for the 180s that Northern have sub-leased from East Coast will be the FGW▸ 142s as the 8 Northern 158s sub-leased to Scotrail are staying there under DfT» orders.
However, apparently East Coast want the 180s by June to start work on maintainence and refurbishment, but the FGW 142s won't be released by then as that is dependant on 172s replacing the London Overground 150s.
Has anyone in the South West heard anything that conflicts with that?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
caliwag
|
|
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2010, 11:38:57 » |
|
The Blackpool line will see at least one loco hauled set
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
eightf48544
|
|
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2010, 12:51:03 » |
|
There was a report on you and Yours that Bombadier are late with teh 172s.
So don't hold your breath.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2010, 12:56:09 » |
|
Has anyone in the South West heard anything that conflicts with that?
Comment has been very cagey ... merely that "contingency plans are in place" if the 150s are late. I got a distinct feeling of "we're not going to tell the customers what we'll be doing" though it looks rather likely that there will be a void somewhere that should have been filled directly or indirectly by 172s. That could be in East Coast's workshops with the 180s not going in, on the lines that the new trains were due to serve, or anywhere in between along the lines of "any units that can be uncoupled to make extra but shorter trains will be". But this final paragraph is purely a statement of some of the logical options.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
super tm
|
|
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2010, 13:40:33 » |
|
In the north we're hearing stories that the replacements for the 180s that Northern have sub-leased from East Coast will be the FGW▸ 142s as the 8 Northern 158s sub-leased to Scotrail are staying there under DfT» orders.
However, apparently East Coast want the 180s by June to start work on maintainence and refurbishment, but the FGW 142s won't be released by then as that is dependant on 172s replacing the London Overground 150s.
Has anyone in the South West heard anything that conflicts with that?
That is what I heard as well 142 back to nothern depending on the cascade from LO
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
matt473
|
|
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2010, 13:45:58 » |
|
The rolling stock deal has been signed but can't remember the details of it. Needless to say the 142s are going from FGW▸ to Northern enabling the 180s to leave, some 156s are going to EMT» with the 150/1s being refurbed to 150/2 standards apparently that are meant for FGW.No doubt someone will be able to post the full list soon
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2010, 13:52:53 » |
|
I think it is fair to say that the 142s are only the initial replacement for the Northern 180s. FGW▸ are down to get 6 x 150s from LO, and 9 x 150s from LM▸ (as far as various reliable sources have explained it). Nearly all the rest of LM's 150s will be going to Northern eventually, I think it is a lot more than FGW get.
Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
northwesterntrains
|
|
« Reply #7 on: March 11, 2010, 14:00:47 » |
|
The rolling stock deal has been signed but can't remember the details of it. Needless to say the 142s are going from FGW▸ to Northern enabling the 180s to leave, some 156s are going to EMT» with the 150/1s being refurbed to 150/2 standards apparently that are meant for FGW.No doubt someone will be able to post the full list soon I think the 6 156s to EMT is following the delivery of 172s to London Midland, as this will mean 150s are available to fill the gap left by 6 156s leaving at Northern. The 6 156s are supposed to mean EMT will be able to use their entire set of 158s exclusively on Liverpool-Norwich services meaning that they're aren't supposed to be any unstrengthened services west of Nottingham. Relating to 150/1 interiors there are two types. All the Northern 150/1s have the North Western Trains refurbished interior 3+2 high back seats with a disabled toilet but no tables. The London Midland 150/1s have the original interior, as do the Northern 150/2s that came from Arriva Trains Northern. The thing of interest with the London Midland 150s are the 3 car sets. There are two 150/0s that were built as 3 car and others that have been made up by adding a third car from a 150/2 to the middle of a 150/1. Apparently some of the driving cars of the middle units of the latter are in a very bad condition, so it would make sense to keep them as 3 car. However, it sounds like DfT» have other ideas.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
northwesterntrains
|
|
« Reply #8 on: March 11, 2010, 14:04:16 » |
|
Nearly all the rest of LM▸ 's 150s will be going to Northern eventually, I think it is a lot more than FGW▸ get.
London Midland have 26 150s, so that would leave 15 for Northern, but as I pointed out in my previous post some of these include made up 3 car sets that could be returned to 2 car. But obviously a 3 car 150 would be a straight swap for a 156 casacded to EMT» in capacity terms, a 2 car 150 would be short of capacity.
|
|
« Last Edit: March 11, 2010, 14:36:50 by northwesterntrains »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #9 on: March 11, 2010, 14:50:27 » |
|
It says a lot for the current state of rolling stock availability that there's such a scrap between TOC▸ 's for DMU▸ 's built 25 years ago!
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
|
|
|
northwesterntrains
|
|
« Reply #10 on: March 11, 2010, 15:00:07 » |
|
It says a lot for the current state of rolling stock availability that there's such a scrap between TOC▸ 's for DMU▸ 's built 25 years ago!
If DfT» hadn't cancelled the proposed 200 new diesel vehicles order for Northern, TPE▸ and FGW▸ because of new electrification plans then it wouldn't have been as bad, but I suppose DfT had to find places for the Thameslink outcasts (319s) to go.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Henry
|
|
« Reply #11 on: March 11, 2010, 17:12:59 » |
|
I just hope we don't have a hot summer.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Timmer
|
|
« Reply #12 on: March 11, 2010, 17:39:13 » |
|
It says a lot for the current state of rolling stock availability that there's such a scrap between TOC▸ 's for DMU▸ 's built 25 years ago!
Pathetic isn't it! To think that it has come to this, fighting over old BR▸ rolling stock. Not what those who thought up rail privatisation had in mind I'm sure but thats what has happened.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Super Guard
|
|
« Reply #14 on: March 19, 2010, 18:02:25 » |
|
Last thing I heard, the 150/1s are on their way down to Exeter this summer, then we will be waving bon voyage (or similar hand gesture) to the 142s. 143s will be likely to operate Western-BPW» & Severn Beach. Also there will be no 3-car 150s running, they will be 2-car sets. Loco-hauled will be going at first opportunity too.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Any opinions made on this forum are purely personal and my own. I am in no way speaking for, or offering the views of First Great Western or First Group.
If my employer feels I have broken any aspect of the Social Media Policy, please PM me immediately, so I can rectify without delay.
|
|
|
|