paulsouthwales
|
|
« Reply #15 on: October 02, 2007, 21:48:04 » |
|
Which lines were the "skippers" taken away from back in the eighties?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vacman
|
|
« Reply #16 on: October 04, 2007, 13:29:26 » |
|
Which lines were the "skippers" taken away from back in the eighties?
St Ives, Falmouth, Newquay, Looe, Gunnislake, Paignton, Exmouth, Barney........... taken away because they were unsuitable! and now they're coming back!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
gaf71
|
|
« Reply #18 on: October 07, 2007, 10:47:04 » |
|
They look great dont they?! Bet you lucky passengers cant wait to get in them. There is a rumour that airplane style sick bags will be issued on board these beauties, for when they are bouncing around the Barny branch!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Timmer
|
|
« Reply #19 on: October 07, 2007, 11:35:23 » |
|
Excellent for FGW▸ that they already come in their colour. All they need to do is stick the 'F' on the side and off we go, instant trains, problems solved.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Conner
|
|
« Reply #20 on: October 07, 2007, 13:13:26 » |
|
Excellent for FGW▸ that they already come in their colour. All they need to do is stick the 'F' on the side and off we go, instant trains, problems solved. Stick F on the side. I doubt it. The never put there names on any local stock. The wessex untis still don't say fgw after 1 and 1/2 years.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Timmer
|
|
« Reply #21 on: October 07, 2007, 18:20:31 » |
|
Excellent for FGW▸ that they already come in their colour. All they need to do is stick the 'F' on the side and off we go, instant trains, problems solved. Stick F on the side. I doubt it. The never put there names on any local stock. The wessex untis still don't say fgw after 1 and 1/2 years. They have on one of their Bristol Based 143s.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Shazz
|
|
« Reply #22 on: October 07, 2007, 19:03:57 » |
|
that's only a temp logo/colour scheme aparently
as that one had a graffiti attack
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Conner
|
|
« Reply #23 on: October 08, 2007, 16:31:23 » |
|
Does anybody know what seating layout the 142's have? As although I live in Cornwall one is bound to end up on the Exmouth-Penzance diagram soon enough despite what FGW▸ say. Excellent for FGW that they already come in their colour. All they need to do is stick the 'F' on the side and off we go, instant trains, problems solved. Stick F on the side. I doubt it. The never put there names on any local stock. The wessex untis still don't say fgw after 1 and 1/2 years. They have on one of their Bristol Based 143s. Yeh that was only because it suffered a Graffiti attack and painting it FGW blue was cheaper/easier than cleaning it up. It still has destinations from the old livery on the window though.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #24 on: October 08, 2007, 16:44:23 » |
|
Bus seating.
I don't think you can complain about Cornwall journeys when People could be spending surplus of 90 minutes on these in summer wedged into the trains just between Paignton - exmouth.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Conner
|
|
« Reply #25 on: October 08, 2007, 16:55:58 » |
|
I wasn't complaining about journeys in Cornwall although i'm hoping we won't have to use them they're better than no train at all or an overcrowded train with less cariages.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
gaf71
|
|
« Reply #26 on: October 08, 2007, 17:43:35 » |
|
Does anybody know what seating layout the 142's have? As although I live in Cornwall one is bound to end up on the Exmouth-Penzance diagram soon enough despite what FGW▸ say.
I'm not sure of the exact numbers, but apparently the seating capacity of a 142 is a lot less than a 158, or a 150, and not a great deal more than a single 153. Anybody know the exact seating capacities?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #27 on: October 08, 2007, 17:46:52 » |
|
Depends on the layout. I believe these units are in 2+3 Bus seating mode so presumably not much different to a luxurious (!!!) 150
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TerminalJunkie
|
|
« Reply #28 on: October 08, 2007, 18:50:29 » |
|
I'm not sure of the exact numbers, but apparently the seating capacity of a 142 is a lot less than a 158, or a 150, and not a great deal more than a single 153. Anybody know the exact seating capacities?
According to Wikipedia (yes, I know...), they vary between 102 and 120 per two-car set. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Rail_Class_142
|
|
|
Logged
|
Daily Mail and Daily Express readers please click here.
|
|
|
TJ
|
|
« Reply #29 on: October 09, 2007, 00:33:08 » |
|
In the meeting that the Avocet▸ Line Rail Users Group (ALRUG) had with Julian Crow (FGW▸ General Manager for the West of England) he stated that exactly how the Pacers would be used was still being worked out. Doubling them up is certainly an option but as the units have no corridor connection this poses staffing problems. There are also problems with platforms lengths, particularly at St James's Park.
Correct me if I am wrong but a 150 plus a 153 has 208 seats, two 142s have 212 so I could only ever envisage two 142s being used where there is currently a 150+153 combination but as someone has already said, the chances of getting two 142s to work together reliably and regularly may at best be wishful thinking.
Looking at the reliability figures which were published in January this year the Northern 142s have only 60% of that of a 150 but it was noticeable that the figure was on a downward trend, which is understandable as when a TOC▸ is getting rid of stock it doesn't lavish too much care on them. The Arriva Wales 142s are only a third as reliable as a 150, the difference being accounted for by the harsher terrain in South Wales. Again there was a downward trend. I suspect that the Northern 142s may not take kindly to the climb from St Davids to Central, amongst other Devon banks.
Don^t expect any sudden increase in reliability or comfort from the transfer to FGW as Julian Crow stated quite clearly that ^they would tidy them up a bit^ but that^s all, as they only have them for two years.
Looking back in magazines of the eighties I noticed that 142s were banned from being coupled to 155s except for line clearance purposes (rescue) and even then only if subject to a 30mph restriction. No reason was quoted but as 155s became 153s is there a potential problem here if ever the need arose for a 142/153 coupling?
I agree with another poster that the four 153s off lease should be brought back in place of 4 of the Pacers. 153s (dog boxes) are far from perfect for the Exmouth Branch as they are so slow in loading and unloading but at least FGW will be spared the need to dispense 142 anti-nausea tablets.
One good piece of news. We were told that Exeter depot is to have a carriage washing machine. About time is all that I can say as for years our local trains have resembled well used agricultural equipment, particularly after foul weather, and being able to see out of the windows can at best be difficult ^ a bit like FGWs refurbished HST▸ coaches but that^s a posting for another place.
To conclude, the message from ALRUG to FGW is quite simple, Pacers, no thanks, we don^t want them.
TJ
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|