Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 07:35 10 Jan 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025
28/01/25 - Coffee Shop 18th Birthday

On this day
10th Jan (2017)
Defibrillators discussion pack published by Network Rail (link)

Train RunningCancelled
05:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
06:31 Severn Beach to Weston-Super-Mare
06:51 Reading to Redhill
07:20 London Paddington to Oxford
08:36 Redhill to Reading
09:00 Oxford to London Paddington
Short Run
06:52 Newbury to London Paddington
06:57 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
07:17 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
08:05 London Paddington to Newbury
08:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
08:34 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
Delayed
06:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 07:38:29 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[94] Thumpers for Dummies
[71] Railcard Prices going up
[58] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[50] Outstanding server / web site issues
[49] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[46] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 33
  Print  
Author Topic: Class 142 Pacers in service on Devon branch lines, 2007 to 2011 - merged topic  (Read 174538 times)
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #300 on: February 11, 2008, 21:17:00 »

If your REALLY bored then look at this, http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=P8jmgowXlyw ummm screw loose maybe?

Shocked  Help!  Shocked
YUP!!!!!! Some people got too much time on their hands!
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #301 on: February 11, 2008, 21:22:51 »

If your REALLY bored then look at this, http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=P8jmgowXlyw ummm screw loose maybe?

Shocked  Help!  Shocked
YUP!!!!!! Some people got too much time on their hands!

I wasnt a great fan of the original song....
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #302 on: February 11, 2008, 21:35:36 »

Same here, but this ones even worse!!
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #303 on: February 12, 2008, 16:26:26 »

 Cheesy There used to be one about pacer doors  Shocked
Logged
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #304 on: February 12, 2008, 19:16:07 »

I had a friend visiting today who is an Exeter driver who says he gets terrible backache after driving 142s. And he spend a lot of his time driving them, as must do a lot of his colleagues. 
Hey, that would be a shame if drivers refused to work 142's on health and safety grounds! It happened before when the 153's were first introduced, drivers refused to drive from the small (new) cab as it was too small, and for months they had to go around in pairs with the small cabs buried! Don't know how they finally sorted it out?

Vacman, you know how small the small cab is on a 153, well the drivers refused to work the units because the cab was only about 1/2 the depth it is now they had to go back to works for reworking.

Do the 153's still have the Riveted cover above the exit doors, that covers over that shocking word "LEYLAND"
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #305 on: February 12, 2008, 19:26:29 »

I had a friend visiting today who is an Exeter driver who says he gets terrible backache after driving 142s. And he spend a lot of his time driving them, as must do a lot of his colleagues. 
Hey, that would be a shame if drivers refused to work 142's on health and safety grounds! It happened before when the 153's were first introduced, drivers refused to drive from the small (new) cab as it was too small, and for months they had to go around in pairs with the small cabs buried! Don't know how they finally sorted it out?

Vacman, you know how small the small cab is on a 153, well the drivers refused to work the units because the cab was only about 1/2 the depth it is now they had to go back to works for reworking.

Do the 153's still have the Riveted cover above the exit doors, that covers over that shocking word "LEYLAND"

Explains why the cab extends into the passenger saloon, hence slow loading times.
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #306 on: February 12, 2008, 19:26:55 »

I had a friend visiting today who is an Exeter driver who says he gets terrible backache after driving 142s. And he spend a lot of his time driving them, as must do a lot of his colleagues. 
Hey, that would be a shame if drivers refused to work 142's on health and safety grounds! It happened before when the 153's were first introduced, drivers refused to drive from the small (new) cab as it was too small, and for months they had to go around in pairs with the small cabs buried! Don't know how they finally sorted it out?

Vacman, you know how small the small cab is on a 153, well the drivers refused to work the units because the cab was only about 1/2 the depth it is now they had to go back to works for reworking.

Do the 153's still have the Riveted cover above the exit doors, that covers over that shocking word "LEYLAND"
I think you may find that 153 "small" cabs were always the same size as they are now, the agreement reached was that the units wouldn't be used on long distance services.
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #307 on: February 12, 2008, 19:29:48 »

Also, if the cab was "half" the depth than it currently is then it would only be about 2 ft from the back of the seat to the front of the desk! physicly impossible to fit anyone into!
Logged
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #308 on: February 12, 2008, 19:35:23 »

Also, if the cab was "half" the depth than it currently is then it would only be about 2 ft from the back of the seat to the front of the desk! physicly impossible to fit anyone into!

Thats why they refused to work them, think the cabs were increased in depth by about 200mm.
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #309 on: February 12, 2008, 19:49:45 »

The only thing I was aware of was that a piece was cut out of the desk to allow more leg room.
Logged
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #310 on: February 12, 2008, 20:02:45 »

If your REALLY bored then look at this, http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=P8jmgowXlyw ummm screw loose maybe?

This is better, (nothing to do with Nodding Donkeys) http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=iN7naLLeB0A

Them were the days.
« Last Edit: February 12, 2008, 20:04:27 by smokey » Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #311 on: February 13, 2008, 13:58:58 »

Recent Parliamentary Written Answer :

Quote
Dr. Pugh: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment she has made of the Health and Safety Executive^s report on the safety of type 142 carriages; what assessment she has made of the suitability of type 142 stock for use on the Manchester-Southport line; what reports she has received of (a) safety and (b) overcrowding issues on this service; and if she will make a statement.

Mr. Tom Harris: Following the publication of the Health and Safety Executive report into the train accident at Winsford South Junction on 23 June 1999, the rail industry has taken forward a programme to make improvements to the crashworthiness of class 142 vehicles. The Office of Rail Regulation (ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about)), the current regulator for rail safety, has been monitoring industry progress on implementing this programme.

Train operating companies are responsible for deploying appropriate rolling stock to meet the capacity demands for the train services they operate. The ORR has received six complaints about safety and crowding issues on Northern Rail services generally since April 2007.
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #312 on: March 09, 2008, 00:03:02 »

Rail passengers can expect cancelled services and overcrowded trains when First Great Western relocates five of its carriages to a northern firm, campaigners have warned (link below.)
http://thisisdevon.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=141507&command=displayContent&sourceNode=257390&home=yes&more_nodeId1=257393&contentPK=20095835

They are angry that FGW (First Great Western) plans to send five of 12 Pacer units to Northern Rail and say it could create misery on the lines which run from Exeter to Exmouth, Barnstaple and Paignton - especially at peak times.

But the company insists the lost carriages will be replaced by units which are currently out of service for an upgrade.

See quote below for background :

Got a list Smiley

Class 142 (12)
142001
142004
142009
142028
142029
142030
142062
142063
142064
142067
142068
142070

004, 028, 062, 067, 070 Short-Leased until October 2008 to cover for refresh program.
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Shazz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 534


View Profile
« Reply #313 on: March 09, 2008, 00:24:48 »

Would this be something to do with the daft?
Logged
dog box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 653


View Profile
« Reply #314 on: March 09, 2008, 08:56:46 »

Funny this now everyone loves 142s!!!........think it was well documented from the very start of the arrival of the Pacers that 5 were only on short term lease and would be going back.
Logged

All postings reflect my own personal views and opinions and are not intended to be, nor should be taken as official statements of first great western or first group policy
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 33
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page