Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 19:35 08 Jan 2025
 
- Mother 'not surprised' son killed on London bus
* Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger that diverted flight
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
tomorrow - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
8th Jan (1991)
Cannon Street buffer stop collision (link)

Train RunningCancelled
18:51 Evesham to Oxford
19:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:30 Looe to Liskeard
20:05 Liskeard to Looe
20:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 05:57 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 06:30 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 07:20 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 07:54 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 08:30 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 09:05 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 09:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 10:08 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 10:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 11:06 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 11:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 12:08 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
18:26 Exmouth to Paignton
Delayed
17:52 Trowbridge to Great Malvern
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:06 London Paddington to Bedwyn
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 08, 2025, 19:45:01 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[174] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[82] Views sought : how train companies give assistance to disabled...
[69] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[54] senior railcard
[52] Coastal walks - station to station
[28] Rail Replacement bus - OK, but I prefer the train.
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: Engineering works/signal failures  (Read 15944 times)
Oxman
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 423


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: February 25, 2010, 12:59:03 »

I understand it was cable theft between Moreton and Evesham, which knocked out the signalling link between the 'boxes. Pilot working was introduced - bit slow at first, but got slicker later in the day. The plan was to fully restore the signalling last night.
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: February 26, 2010, 00:25:08 »

And presumably the thieves will have got home and taken a closer look and realised they taken a load of the fibre-optic cable installed last summer with no copper in it and of no scrap value.
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: February 26, 2010, 02:48:47 »

It's often struck me that the railways shoot themselves in the foot PR (Public Relations)-wise by describing cable theft as "signal failure" - makes it sound like shoddy equipment or maintenance is to blame when in reality it's nothing of the sort. Would attributing the delay to "theft of signalling cables" or something along those lines be generally understood, or just cause more confusion?
Logged
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2037


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: February 26, 2010, 04:53:38 »

It's often struck me that the railways shoot themselves in the foot PR (Public Relations)-wise by describing cable theft as "signal failure" - makes it sound like shoddy equipment or maintenance is to blame when in reality it's nothing of the sort. Would attributing the delay to "theft of signalling cables" or something along those lines be generally understood, or just cause more confusion?
Agree totally. And it'd be generally understood.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43062



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #19 on: February 26, 2010, 06:24:05 »

Agree totally. And it'd be generally understood.

BUT ... would descriptions of that sort encourage certain elements to think "oh - there's an idea - let's go out and nick some cable ..."?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Oxman
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 423


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: February 26, 2010, 08:42:54 »

At first, it was thought to be signal failure. Some time later, the cut cable was found........
Logged
IanL
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 348


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: February 26, 2010, 10:05:23 »

Thanks for all the updates and explanations. As a final word I got on my first 'on time' train for the week this morning, 0835 CBY to OXF» (Oxford - next trains), on time and for once managed to find a seat. (no other train has been less than 20min late if it has run).
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: February 26, 2010, 13:44:58 »

And presumably the thieves will have got home and taken a closer look and realised they taken a load of the fibre-optic cable installed last summer with no copper in it and of no scrap value.

Maybe fibre optic cable needs to be better labelled as such. 
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4496


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: February 26, 2010, 16:35:01 »

And presumably the thieves will have got home and taken a closer look and realised they taken a load of the fibre-optic cable installed last summer with no copper in it and of no scrap value.

Maybe fibre optic cable needs to be better labelled as such. 
Would not matter a jot .......... we have cable clearly labeled HIGH VOLTAGE 33,000 Volts and they still get cut when they are alive!!!  These criminals don't care about the cost, inconvenience caused or even the risk to their own lives they just want the few quid they can get from a dodgy scrap dealer
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Oxman
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 423


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: March 01, 2010, 20:18:41 »

Another cable was cut at Honeybourne over the weekend, I understand.
Logged
Steve44
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 100

I quite like thames turbos...


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: March 02, 2010, 22:02:51 »

Agree totally. And it'd be generally understood.

BUT ... would descriptions of that sort encourage certain elements to think "oh - there's an idea - let's go out and nick some cable ..."?

Good point.
Perhaps it could be reported as "Vandalism" in that case?
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #26 on: March 02, 2010, 22:20:27 »

'Signal failure' or 'signalling problems' gives the impression that the fault lies with the railway. Therefore pax will maybe see or hear this and quite justifiably put in a claim for delay compensation.

As FGW (First Great Western) is not yet using the 'Delay/Repay' scheme, then they do not have to pay out in the event of vandalism, as vandalism is classed as a 'circumstance beyond the control of the railway'.

Tell it like it is at the earliest opportunity. Leave details on the website for a few days after an event with the correct reasons for delays and pax will be better informed as to whether they are able to claim compensation.

Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page