Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:35 19 Apr 2025
 
- Race Across the World winner on 'authentic travel' and how to do it
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railsay Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
13:50 Liskeard to Looe
Additional 13:59 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
14:22 Looe to Liskeard
16:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
18:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
21:32 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
22:39 Swindon to Gloucester
Short Run
10:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
12:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
13:18 Paignton to Exmouth
14:14 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
14:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
15:35 Barnstaple to Exeter Central
16:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
20:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
21:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Westbury
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2025, 13:37:14 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[147] FOSS and FOSW validity - some quirks
[111] Fifteen years of the Transwilts CRP
[97] Wiltshire Day Rover - new multi-operator bus ticket
[81] St Erth station - facilities, footbridge, improvements, incide...
[56] Destination: London Travelcard Zones 1-6
[44] Melksham's rail service - where are we, on the anniversary of ...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: Engineering works/signal failures  (Read 16900 times)
Oxman
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 423


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: February 25, 2010, 12:59:03 »

I understand it was cable theft between Moreton and Evesham, which knocked out the signalling link between the 'boxes. Pilot working was introduced - bit slow at first, but got slicker later in the day. The plan was to fully restore the signalling last night.
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: February 26, 2010, 00:25:08 »

And presumably the thieves will have got home and taken a closer look and realised they taken a load of the fibre-optic cable installed last summer with no copper in it and of no scrap value.
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: February 26, 2010, 02:48:47 »

It's often struck me that the railways shoot themselves in the foot PR (Public Relations)-wise by describing cable theft as "signal failure" - makes it sound like shoddy equipment or maintenance is to blame when in reality it's nothing of the sort. Would attributing the delay to "theft of signalling cables" or something along those lines be generally understood, or just cause more confusion?
Logged
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2113


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: February 26, 2010, 04:53:38 »

It's often struck me that the railways shoot themselves in the foot PR (Public Relations)-wise by describing cable theft as "signal failure" - makes it sound like shoddy equipment or maintenance is to blame when in reality it's nothing of the sort. Would attributing the delay to "theft of signalling cables" or something along those lines be generally understood, or just cause more confusion?
Agree totally. And it'd be generally understood.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43848



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #19 on: February 26, 2010, 06:24:05 »

Agree totally. And it'd be generally understood.

BUT ... would descriptions of that sort encourage certain elements to think "oh - there's an idea - let's go out and nick some cable ..."?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Oxman
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 423


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: February 26, 2010, 08:42:54 »

At first, it was thought to be signal failure. Some time later, the cut cable was found........
Logged
IanL
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 348


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: February 26, 2010, 10:05:23 »

Thanks for all the updates and explanations. As a final word I got on my first 'on time' train for the week this morning, 0835 CBY to OXF» (Oxford - next trains), on time and for once managed to find a seat. (no other train has been less than 20min late if it has run).
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: February 26, 2010, 13:44:58 »

And presumably the thieves will have got home and taken a closer look and realised they taken a load of the fibre-optic cable installed last summer with no copper in it and of no scrap value.

Maybe fibre optic cable needs to be better labelled as such. 
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4531


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: February 26, 2010, 16:35:01 »

And presumably the thieves will have got home and taken a closer look and realised they taken a load of the fibre-optic cable installed last summer with no copper in it and of no scrap value.

Maybe fibre optic cable needs to be better labelled as such. 
Would not matter a jot .......... we have cable clearly labeled HIGH VOLTAGE 33,000 Volts and they still get cut when they are alive!!!  These criminals don't care about the cost, inconvenience caused or even the risk to their own lives they just want the few quid they can get from a dodgy scrap dealer
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Oxman
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 423


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: March 01, 2010, 20:18:41 »

Another cable was cut at Honeybourne over the weekend, I understand.
Logged
Steve44
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 100

I quite like thames turbos...


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: March 02, 2010, 22:02:51 »

Agree totally. And it'd be generally understood.

BUT ... would descriptions of that sort encourage certain elements to think "oh - there's an idea - let's go out and nick some cable ..."?

Good point.
Perhaps it could be reported as "Vandalism" in that case?
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19304



View Profile
« Reply #26 on: March 02, 2010, 22:20:27 »

'Signal failure' or 'signalling problems' gives the impression that the fault lies with the railway. Therefore pax will maybe see or hear this and quite justifiably put in a claim for delay compensation.

As FGW (First Great Western) is not yet using the 'Delay/Repay' scheme, then they do not have to pay out in the event of vandalism, as vandalism is classed as a 'circumstance beyond the control of the railway'.

Tell it like it is at the earliest opportunity. Leave details on the website for a few days after an event with the correct reasons for delays and pax will be better informed as to whether they are able to claim compensation.

Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page