Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 19:35 20 Apr 2025
 
- RAF jets intercept Russian aircraft near Nato airspace
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railsay Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
20th Apr (1789)
Opening of Sapperton Canal Tunnel

Train RunningCancelled
17:37 London Paddington to Swansea
17:48 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
18:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
18:15 Penzance to Plymouth
18:23 Swansea to London Paddington
19:43 Swindon to Westbury
20:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
20:11 Weymouth to Bristol Temple Meads
20:17 Taunton to Bristol Temple Meads
21:09 Portsmouth Harbour to Bristol Temple Meads
22:45 London Paddington to Bristol Parkway
23:11 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
21/04/25 08:03 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
21/04/25 12:12 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
15:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
16:18 Penzance to London Paddington
16:25 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
17:09 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
17:25 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:00 London Paddington to Penzance
18:09 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
18:11 Castle Cary to Swindon
18:25 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
19:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
19:09 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
19:25 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
19:39 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
20:09 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
20:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
21:57 Worcester Shrub Hill to Bristol Temple Meads
22:30 Cardiff Central to Westbury
21/04/25 10:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
21/04/25 11:29 Weymouth to Gloucester
21/04/25 16:31 Barnstaple to Axminster
Delayed
20:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
23:12 Bristol Temple Meads to Weston-Super-Mare
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 20, 2025, 19:44:52 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[178] Fortuitous connections ... and an App which fails to offer the...
[105] RNLI station celebrates 10 years of saving lives - Portishead,...
[54] FOSS and FOSW validity - some quirks
[53] St Erth station - facilities, footbridge, improvements, incide...
[44] More than half of train travellers now use the railway for lei...
[41] Eyesight rules for motorists unsafe, says coroner
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Cleanliness of FGW stock  (Read 8732 times)
Trowres
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 820


View Profile
« on: February 17, 2010, 01:32:53 »

The FGW (First Great Western) 158s seem to suffer badly from dirty windows, while SWT (South West Trains)'s similar trains do not. Is there some major difference in the cleaning programme / equipment to explain this?
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2010, 03:42:14 »

It may be partly explained by the intensive use that FGW (First Great Western)'s stock gets, compared to the SWT (South West Trains) DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit). SWT has plenty of spare units so they spend a lot more time hanging around Salisbury depot being cossetted than your average FGW 158!

It's also possible that there's a difference in cleaning regime - for example, I don't know if all of FGW's units finish their diagrams at a depot with a carriage washer every night, whereas I'm 90% sure all of SWT's do.

Internally from fairly wide experience I've almost always found FGW units to be very clean (and certainly much better than in the days of Wessex and Thames), the odd exceptions usually being busy trains late at night containing more than their fair share of boozed-up pond life.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43857



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2010, 06:57:26 »

Looking back, Wessex got into trouble with Passenger Focus for the filthy state of their trains at one point, so this is nothing new (I'm afraid I had a bit of a gripe that PF (Penalty Fare) has "how clean are the trains" in their remit, but NOT "are the trains actually running at the time that people want to travel" - but that's an aside).

I've been on Southern, SWT (South West Trains) and FGW (First Great Western) services over the past few weeks - various journeys - and the "West" fleet has been far least clean, with a shockingly filthy 150 on Saturday on the 'local' out from Bristol to Bradford-on-Avon.  Perhaps FGW have a different paint finish / vinyl that attracts dirt?

Always one to take advantage ... the state of the windows made a beautiful atmospheric filter for photographs:



although changing the focus to the windows was a bit depressing:


Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
12hoursunday
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 267


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2010, 12:02:34 »

There is a memo going around re these dirty DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit)'s. It all stems from the cold weather back along when the decision to isolated washers was made. Days and days of not washing has made the dirt stick to the bodysides so well that when put through those wash plants the brushes left most of it where it was.

There is a program of manual washes taking place and I in fact saw a 158 going through a scrub with some chaps armed with big buckets and brushes at the 'Marsh' last night!
Logged
Brucey
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2259


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: February 17, 2010, 13:30:44 »

I find the inside of FGW (First Great Western)'s 158s to be very clean.  However the outside is always dirty.  But then does it really matter whether the outside is clean or not?

I sometimes stand at Cosham and see an SWT (South West Trains) EMU (Electric Multiple Unit) on the opposite platform which is sparkling.  Then an FGW 158 pulls out and it is filthy!
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 17, 2010, 13:39:45 »

  But then does it really matter whether the outside is clean or not?

it matters when the windows are dirty.  If  the carriage washers can't clean teh wholw train (at times of breakdown, freezing weather or draught), an effort could still be made on the windows.
Logged
matt473
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 374


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: February 17, 2010, 14:07:11 »

This is a prime example of the age old problem of cleaner rolling stock or those that are out providing services. There is unlikely to be any slack in the diagrams in the short or medium term as the fleet is over streched as it is. Considering the problems as a results of fatalities and accident damage, the units are not in to bad a condition as result of the effort put in by staff. If only there was more slack to ensre all the problems could be sorted, however this won't happen unless FGW (First Great Western) recieved a large number of units which we all know will never happen
Logged
smithy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 17, 2010, 15:09:40 »

There is a memo going around re these dirty DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit)'s. It all stems from the cold weather back along when the decision to isolated washers was made. Days and days of not washing has made the dirt stick to the bodysides so well that when put through those wash plants the brushes left most of it where it was.

There is a program of manual washes taking place and I in fact saw a 158 going through a scrub with some chaps armed with big buckets and brushes at the 'Marsh' last night!

the quality of the wash plant has to be questioned as 158's stabled at fratton go through the SWT (South West Trains) wash and come out clean,the wash plant down there must have better brushes than FGW (First Great Western)'s.
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 17, 2010, 15:21:25 »

the quality of the wash plant has to be questioned as 158's stabled at fratton go through the SWT (South West Trains) wash and come out clean,the wash plant down there must have better brushes than FGW (First Great Western)'s.

IIRC ('if I recall/remember/read correctly') I heard an explanation once of SWT's exterior cleanliness being down to their having "acid" train washing plants rather than detergent washes which don't do very much if the train is very dirty. 

It was a long time ago I heard this explanation and I might be wrong, but their would appear to be such a thing as an "acid train wash" judging by this link which happens to be illustrated with a SWT EMU (Electric Multiple Unit).

http://www.trainwash.co.uk/bingham/Services/TrainCare/AdvancedDetergents/AdvanceSafeAcid/tabid/193/language/en-GB/Default.aspx

 
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19304



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: February 17, 2010, 15:40:58 »

The talk of slack in the diagrams is surely a bit of a red herring. There's a large amount of slack say between 2 and 5am. Is it not more likely a case of a keeping costs to a minimum and not spending that little bit extra on staff and/or decent carriage washers.
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: February 17, 2010, 15:57:04 »

Doesn't seem to be an across-the-board policy though. The LTV (London [and] Thames Valley) fleet usually looks reasonably tidy externally and more often than not you can see your face in the side of an HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)).
Logged
smithy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: February 17, 2010, 20:37:44 »

Doesn't seem to be an across-the-board policy though. The LTV (London [and] Thames Valley) fleet usually looks reasonably tidy externally and more often than not you can see your face in the side of an HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)).


very good point it would seem only the west fleet that is dirty,with the exception of the pacers in my opinion.

so it leads back to the wash plant at SPM (St Philip's Marsh (Bristol depot)) as being the problem as it would seem every other depots is working fine?HuhHuh??
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19304



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: February 17, 2010, 22:00:16 »

Can't we get 'Bob-a-Job' on the case? They do a grand job in supermarket car parks of a Sunday.  Wink Grin Grin
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
gaf71
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 305


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: February 17, 2010, 22:34:20 »

I know that the wash plant at Exeter doesn't get used, when the temperature drops below a certain point (freezing I presume!) Huh
Logged
smithy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: February 18, 2010, 08:24:57 »

I know that the wash plant at Exeter doesn't get used, when the temperature drops below a certain point (freezing I presume!) Huh

thats correct at freezing point the same as other depots but when in operation it seems to clean a lot better than bristols
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page