Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 14:15 10 Jan 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025
28/01/25 - Coffee Shop 18th Birthday

On this day
10th Jan (1863)
Metropolitain line opened from Paddington (link)

Train RunningCancelled
12:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
13:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
13:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
13:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
13:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
14:02 Oxford to London Paddington
14:12 Newbury to Reading
14:15 West Ealing to Greenford
14:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:23 London Paddington to Oxford
14:30 Greenford to West Ealing
14:37 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
14:45 West Ealing to Greenford
15:00 Greenford to West Ealing
15:03 Oxford to London Paddington
15:15 West Ealing to Greenford
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:30 Greenford to West Ealing
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:00 Oxford to London Paddington
16:23 London Paddington to Oxford
16:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:00 Oxford to London Paddington
17:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Short Run
11:57 Great Malvern to London Paddington
13:09 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
13:26 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
13:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
13:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
13:48 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
13:56 Newbury to London Paddington
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:06 London Paddington to Newbury
14:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
14:15 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
14:20 Carmarthen to London Paddington
14:25 Newbury to London Paddington
14:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
14:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
14:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
15:08 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
15:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
15:12 London Paddington to Newbury
15:37 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
15:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
15:55 Newbury to London Paddington
16:05 London Paddington to Newbury
16:07 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
16:34 Newbury to London Paddington
16:50 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
17:05 London Paddington to Newbury
17:20 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
Delayed
13:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
13:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
14:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 14:12 Reading to Slough
etc
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 14:30:09 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[110] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[98] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[53] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[52] Westminster Hall debate : Railway services to South West
[46] Birthday trip, Melksham to Penzance - 28th January 2025
[25] A Beginner's Guide to the Great Western "Coffee Shop" Passenge...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: Short trains today ...  (Read 8692 times)
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6554


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: February 20, 2010, 07:17:13 »

It was a great shame the government's ^300m DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) project was cancelled because of future electrification which may never happen. Would have solved a lot of overcrowding issues in the West by cascading the 158 fleet to other routes and given the Cardiff-Portsmouth line the decent stock it deserves for a long distance route.

We are increasingly seeing what a short sighted decision this was with services running full when three car and leaving passengers behind when 2 car.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: February 20, 2010, 10:28:38 »

it wouldn't even be too difficult to extend the 172 order as the production line is currently open! Barmy decision.
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6554


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: February 20, 2010, 13:20:20 »

it wouldn't even be too difficult to extend the 172 order as the production line is currently open! Barmy decision.
Exactly, its still not too late.

Looks like there are 4 diagrams running short formed today.
Logged
smithy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: February 20, 2010, 15:24:48 »

it wouldn't even be too difficult to extend the 172 order as the production line is currently open! Barmy decision.
Exactly, its still not too late.

Looks like there are 4 diagrams running short formed today.

i think there is 3 short formed today because only 7 out of 10 3 cars are out to play,2 are stopped 798&956 and 2 are split back as 2 cars temporarily for repairs 951&952.

i also think the cancelling of dmu order is a joke the cardiff-pompey line is in desperate need of new stock ideally 4 cars.especially considering electrification may never happen due to recession and the need for government to cut costs not to mention a change in government in a few months might mean a change in thinking/priorities
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: February 20, 2010, 15:25:48 »

The idea that the DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) project was part of a plan to kick start the economy during the recession seems to have been completely forgotten about - but as discussed at the time, the long term nature of the project didn't reflect that aim anyway...

Paul
Logged
Jez
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 516


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: February 20, 2010, 21:28:44 »

The 1730 was running short formed with 2 carriages - not sure which others were - think the 1830 was 3 carriages. There was also no catering on the 1730 according to the station announcements.
Logged
crwydryn
Newbie
*
Posts: 9


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: February 21, 2010, 13:42:19 »

It was a great shame the government's ^300m DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) project was cancelled because of future electrification which may never happen. Would have solved a lot of overcrowding issues in the West by cascading the 158 fleet to other routes and given the Cardiff-Portsmouth line the decent stock it deserves for a long distance route.

We are increasingly seeing what a short sighted decision this was with services running full when three car and leaving passengers behind when 2 car.

Seriously, does anyone know if Passenger Focus has any real concern at all about this?    What is this Quango actually doing about overcrowding on Cardiff -Portsmouth? Their useless last newsletter in December seemed full of comgratulating FGW (First Great Western) for its improvements.   Perhaps they should have their next management meeting at Bradford on Avon.   
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43076



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #22 on: February 21, 2010, 18:54:34 »

Seriously, does anyone know if Passenger Focus has any real concern at all about this?    ...

Passenger Focus's position is that they are financed by the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) and ensure that the DfT's franchise specification is met. I don't know the answer as to whether or not they have serious concerns, but I would suspect that the answer hinges on whether the step back up from 2 to 3 coaches per train became a formal part of the franchise agreement, or if it was a looser agreement or promise made under separate cover, which would then put it outside their remit as I understand it.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page