pullman
|
|
« on: February 13, 2010, 13:14:22 » |
|
Does anyone have the diagrams for the SWT▸ 158 that FGW▸ have got?
|
|
« Last Edit: February 14, 2010, 20:05:36 by pullman »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2010, 19:39:10 » |
|
It isn't necessarily the same train every day, it runs from and back to Salisbury.
Leaves Salisbury as 2E16 0604 in multiple with a 2.150 for Gloucester, splits at Westbury
then forms 2M10 0702 Westbury to Cheltenham via Swindon.
then via Swindon-Cheltenham-Swindon-Cheltenham to Bristol (times/numbers not available to me)
returns to Salisbury as the rear portion of the 1O86 2225 ex Bristol TM‡, an SWT▸ service.
Hope this of use - AIUI▸ this diagram is supposed to be the same each weekday, but I think it has been observed elsewhere now and again.
Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2010, 20:06:26 » |
|
Here's an odd one ... from today I can confirm, weekdays, that it does usually run the morning "TransWilts service (arriving Swindon 07:48), the Golden Valley; I understood that it does a diagram off usual SWT▸ territory so that users don't think it's the waterloo service because of the paint job. Obviously it was doing summat else today.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
smithy
|
|
« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2010, 21:27:25 » |
|
It isn't necessarily the same train every day, it runs from and back to Salisbury.
Leaves Salisbury as 2E16 0604 in multiple with a 2.150 for Gloucester, splits at Westbury
then forms 2M10 0702 Westbury to Cheltenham via Swindon.
then via Swindon-Cheltenham-Swindon-Cheltenham to Bristol (times/numbers not available to me)
returns to Salisbury as the rear portion of the 1O86 2225 ex Bristol TM‡, an SWT▸ service.
Hope this of use - AIUI▸ this diagram is supposed to be the same each weekday, but I think it has been observed elsewhere now and again.
Paul
just to add it is the front portion of 1o86 westbury to salisbury,it works a service to westbury in the evening then sits on sidings until approx 22.30 when it then comes out on to platform 1 to wait for 1o86 attachment at 23.04
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
The Grecian
|
|
« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2010, 11:59:42 » |
|
It was working the 10.41 Bristol TM‡ - Worcester service yesterday. Bit strange seeing a SWT▸ unit running a FGW▸ service but none of the other passengers seemed confused by it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pullman
|
|
« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2010, 18:40:08 » |
|
I have heard that it worked the 15:54 service from Swindon to Cheltenham Spa.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Brucey
|
|
« Reply #6 on: February 14, 2010, 18:47:50 » |
|
It was working the 10.41 Bristol TM‡ - Worcester service yesterday. Bit strange seeing a SWT▸ unit running a FGW▸ service but none of the other passengers seemed confused by it.
I know the feeling (bit in bold). This evening there was a 2 coach Arriva Trains Wales service which ran down the Severn Beach line. No-one (passengers) seemed to care at all that this was a completely different TOC▸ 's train. The guard even announced on board that this was a FGW service. Shame I didn't have my camera; an ATW▸ train at Redland would have gone down well for my collection!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
matt473
|
|
« Reply #7 on: February 14, 2010, 19:11:29 » |
|
]I know the feeling (bit in bold). This evening there was a 2 coach Arriva Trains Wales service which ran down the Severn Beach line. No-one (passengers) seemed to care at all that this was a completely different TOC▸ 's train. The guard even announced on board that this was a FGW▸ service. Shame I didn't have my camera; an ATW▸ train at Redland would have gone down well for my collection!
Since you mentioned the ATW unit, the other day I saw an ATW driver working the unit out of Temple Meads so could this not cause cause confusion branding wise as I do know people that catch trains according to the colour of them as they assosciate it with different routes (as the TOCs intended). On a side note I thought FGW no longer hired in crew from ATW
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
readytostart
|
|
« Reply #8 on: February 14, 2010, 21:38:18 » |
|
We had a few cuckoos in the next beck at ScotRail, mostly old Wessex units but we did have two 158s in full SWT▸ livery which raised a few eyebrows. Knocked spots off the local units, the boys at Salisbury depot know their stuff. I have a photo but can't for the life of me work out how to add it.
|
|
« Last Edit: February 14, 2010, 21:44:25 by readytostart »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
smithy
|
|
« Reply #9 on: February 14, 2010, 21:55:16 » |
|
We had a few cuckoos in the next beck at ScotRail, mostly old Wessex units but we did have two 158s in full SWT▸ livery which raised a few eyebrows. Knocked spots off the local units, the boys at Salisbury depot know their stuff. I have a photo but can't for the life of me work out how to add it.
the swt sets are decent units compared to all the other rubbish running around,those 2 in SWT livery were they 786 and 789 that originated from central at same time wessex got 792,855,859,860? major difference being SWT did loads of mods before they entered service unlike wessex tyseley to canton then straight in to traffic.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #10 on: February 14, 2010, 21:58:51 » |
|
I have a photo but can't for the life of me work out how to add it.
If you're happy to e-mail it to me, I'll do the necessary!
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
John R
|
|
« Reply #11 on: February 14, 2010, 22:01:01 » |
|
Let's face it. Most people don't care, and probably don't even notice. If a train turns up at the appointed time and stops at the station then they will get on without a second thought.
Over the past few years we've had Central liveried units, Transpennine Express, Silverlink, NWT pacers, and currently ATW▸ and SWT▸ , not to mention 2 loco hauled sets. Jo Public doesn't seem to bat an eyelid, let alone get confused.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #12 on: February 14, 2010, 22:02:20 » |
|
Until they see a handle on a mark 2 door and start prodding the side of the coach
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #13 on: February 14, 2010, 22:09:04 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
John R
|
|
« Reply #14 on: February 14, 2010, 22:20:28 » |
|
We did indeed, when FGW▸ were hiring in the coaching stock of an HST▸ . So that does indeed count.
(Also of course XC▸ services in either MML» or XC livery, but those don't count as they weren't FGW services.)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|