Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 19:35 08 Jan 2025
 
- Mother 'not surprised' son killed on London bus
* Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger that diverted flight
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
tomorrow - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
8th Jan (1991)
Cannon Street buffer stop collision (link)

Train RunningCancelled
18:51 Evesham to Oxford
19:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:30 Looe to Liskeard
20:05 Liskeard to Looe
20:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
23:20 Exmouth to Exeter St Davids
09/01/25 05:57 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 06:30 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 07:20 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 07:54 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 08:30 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 09:05 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 09:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 10:08 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 10:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 11:06 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 11:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 12:08 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
18:26 Exmouth to Paignton
18:38 Barnstaple to Exmouth
21:39 Paignton to Exmouth
Delayed
17:52 Trowbridge to Great Malvern
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:06 London Paddington to Bedwyn
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 08, 2025, 19:51:25 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[174] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[82] Views sought : how train companies give assistance to disabled...
[69] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[54] senior railcard
[52] Coastal walks - station to station
[28] Rail Replacement bus - OK, but I prefer the train.
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 ... 21
  Print  
Author Topic: Turbo refresh started.  (Read 115280 times)
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #165 on: July 28, 2011, 18:22:52 »

Chiltern only recently (within 12 months) finishhed their 165 refresh....

Really? I remember reading a press release some years ago celebrating the fact that Chiltern had become the first TOC (Train Operating Company) to refurb all its trains. Perhaps some have had a second refresh. I know A/C's been fitted for years.

People always complain about A/C - it was turned down on Desiros last year. Can't please everyone. I'd rather be too cold on a hot day then be sweltering on a FGW (First Great Western) offering.

I've been on many more noisy and PIS (Passenger Information System) broken FGW Turbos than Chiltern. Several Chiltern 168s are rattley - but I suspect that's just Bombardier for you!

FGW should be wanting to spend some cash - they were warned a few years ago, and the remedial measures included refurbing the Turbos. It hasn't escaped peoples' notice that the only thing that was done for ages was the application of dynamic lines!
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #166 on: July 28, 2011, 18:55:12 »

It hasn't escaped peoples' notice that the only thing that was done for ages was the application of dynamic lines!

Interesting that, because it's not actually correct.

Before the Greater Western franchise started in 2006 FGW (First Great Western) had already carried out a 'light refresh' on the turbo fleet during its First Great Western Link tenure: not an extensive job, admittedly, but new seat covers, floor coverings and toilets to improve on the tired and threadbare state in which Thames handed over the units. The toilets in particular are a significant improvement on what went before.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #167 on: July 28, 2011, 19:13:31 »

True - I'd forgotten about that.

But the announcement of a proper refresh was years ago and it is still not complete, and does not include A/C!
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10362


View Profile
« Reply #168 on: July 29, 2011, 00:30:12 »

Several Chiltern 168s are rattley - but I suspect that's just Bombardier for you!

Horrible vibrations if you're sat under the engine as it makes the pull out tables rattle!  Other than that (and the PIS (Passenger Information System) system), very good trains.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #169 on: July 29, 2011, 00:40:44 »

Sat under the engine? I should imagine it would be noisy and rattly there!  Tongue Wink Grin

.... and a bit dangerous.
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10362


View Profile
« Reply #170 on: July 29, 2011, 00:47:59 »

 Tongue  Get back into the kitchen...
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Jonathan H
Full Member
***
Posts: 55


View Profile
« Reply #171 on: August 09, 2011, 08:03:23 »

166206 out this morning on the 0634 Reading to Gatwick Airport, unrefreshed, but with the unmistakeable noise of the new air conditioning system (and extra stickers on the window to suggest keeping the windows shut).

Presumably the system has passed its trials and is now to be installed across the fleet?
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #172 on: August 09, 2011, 16:24:48 »

Why can't they seal the windows? Unless the stickers are huge with LARGE RED WRITING it won't work!
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13028


View Profile Email
« Reply #173 on: August 09, 2011, 16:31:32 »

Because then H&S (Health and Safety) requires fresh air to be pumped at a certain force through the carriage - and rechnically, its out of serrvice if this fails.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #174 on: August 09, 2011, 18:14:44 »

Ok - why not have 158 style windows.
And how do Chiltern manage?

Look - I'm sick of hearing about "unreliable AC". The fact is another TOC (Train Operating Company) with the same stock solved the problem. So there is no excuse for FGW (First Great Western) not to get it sorted.

Ditto with 158s.
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #175 on: August 09, 2011, 18:28:31 »

Ok - why not have 158 style windows.

For the umpteenth time, because 158s are always driver-guard operated so there's always someone with the requisite T-key to open them should that be necessary.

At a guess I suspect that Chiltern had more money to throw at the problem, but you will notice from various comments above that it's not unanimously agreed that the Chiltern a/c is always suitable or comfortable.
Logged
super tm
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 599


View Profile
« Reply #176 on: August 09, 2011, 19:06:10 »

Because then H&S (Health and Safety) requires fresh air to be pumped at a certain force through the carriage - and rechnically, its out of serrvice if this fails.

Sorry I dont understand this comment.  I am not aware of any such H&S requirement.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #177 on: August 09, 2011, 19:56:28 »

For the umpteenth time, because 158s are always driver-guard operated so there's always someone with the requisite T-key to open them should that be necessary.

Never heard this argument before. Doesn't buy with me - surely the driver has a key and can open the windows before service.
Anyway, I only suggested it - Chiltern manage with all windows sealed!

If Chiltern had the money to throw - First Group must have it.
People always moan about AC temperature - e.g. SWT (South West Trains). But at least it works.

Sorry - there's no excuse.
Logged
Jonathan H
Full Member
***
Posts: 55


View Profile
« Reply #178 on: August 09, 2011, 20:59:15 »

What I find inexcusable is that nobody official ever seems to make any attempt to shut the windows on 166s. They enter service in the morning with windows open. Surely it should be the responsibility of staff to protect the investment in the new air conditioning system.

I'm back on 166206 tonight on the 2003 Gatwick Airport to Reading.  5 of the vents are open in a carriage with a new air conditioning system. I've shut some but not intervened at occupied seats. There has been ample opportunity for the windows to be shut during the day or even on the layover at Gatwick before departure.

Worse still, the refurbishment hasn't resolved the problem of broken catches and mangled frames that prevent the windows from being shut.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10362


View Profile
« Reply #179 on: August 09, 2011, 22:37:56 »

There has been ample opportunity for the windows to be shut during the day

And ample opportunity for the first passenger afterwards to come along and open them again...
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 ... 21
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page