grahame
|
|
« Reply #135 on: January 05, 2010, 10:17:44 » |
|
The SWT▸ contribution is 8 car all day 7/7, except for the last train from Waterloo (Mon - Sat) which are single 450s. The Reading route 458s are made up into 8 car sets semi-permanently .
Paul
Thanks - shows how little I've looked across at that service in the past. I'll come back and update my calculations when any other error have been notified to me - I suspect some of the other figures may be out too, but not that dramatically!
Here are the remaining pictures to identify during the final day: 1,2 6 7,9 10,11
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
Brucey
|
|
« Reply #136 on: January 05, 2010, 10:23:01 » |
|
Was number 1 taken at Avoncliff?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #137 on: January 05, 2010, 10:28:53 » |
|
Was number 1 taken at Avoncliff?
Yes, it was
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
Tim
|
|
« Reply #138 on: January 05, 2010, 10:34:37 » |
|
Number 2 is Thingley sidings between Box tunnel and Chippenham??
I think that the derelict stock has long gone
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #139 on: January 05, 2010, 10:38:50 » |
|
Number 2 is Thingley sidings between Box tunnel and Chippenham??
I think that the derelict stock has long gone
Yes, you're right. The pictures are all taken within the last five years - you'll see old paint jobs too, as well as those wrecks - it's quite a surprise how much has changed!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
Mookiemoo
|
|
« Reply #140 on: January 05, 2010, 11:31:56 » |
|
Is 6 Bristol Temple Meads? The arch thing looks like paddington but its not paddington and I thought BTM▸ was very similar in design. But then I've never been to BTM so I have no clue
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."
"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
|
|
|
Tim
|
|
« Reply #141 on: January 05, 2010, 11:40:10 » |
|
Is 6 Bristol Temple Meads? The arch thing looks like paddington but its not paddington and I thought BTM▸ was very similar in design. But then I've never been to BTM so I have no clue
I assume you mean 9 and I think you are right. The barrier tapes would be in the right possition for the station exit and I think they were used before the automatic barriers were installed.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #142 on: January 05, 2010, 11:48:02 » |
|
No.4 - already guessed correctly was Bristol Temple Meads. Neither 6 nor 9 is Temple Meads (they're not anywhere else in Bristol either!) ... but I can see the similarity. Most, but not all, of the easy ones have been guessed correctly already
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
eightf48544
|
|
« Reply #143 on: January 05, 2010, 15:35:28 » |
|
9 Edinburgh (Haymarket)? First Scotrail livery
10 is in TV, turbo and OMO▸ mirror Maidenhead Platform 1?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #144 on: January 05, 2010, 15:42:15 » |
|
9 Edinburgh (Haymarket)? First Scotrail livery
10 is in TV, turbo and OMO▸ mirror Maidenhead Platform 1?
Sorry - neither of those is correct. I don't think (9) *is* Scotrail livery ... the train certainly wasn't running a Scotrail service
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
Tim
|
|
« Reply #145 on: January 05, 2010, 15:52:39 » |
|
having just realised that we are not necessaily operating in FGW▸ -land and that scotland is a possibility, I can say fairly confidently that No 11 is a pier of the Forth Bridge.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tim
|
|
« Reply #146 on: January 05, 2010, 15:55:48 » |
|
[quote author=grahame link=topic=5982.msg58896#msg58896 date=1262706135
Sorry - neither of those is correct. I don't think (9) *is* Scotrail livery ... the train certainly wasn't running a Scotrail service [/quote]
I think it is a Transpennine Express livery (from the pre-First days), which would make Newcastle or York possibilities but the roof just doesn't seem right or it could be a TPE▸ station I haven't been too like Hull or Huddersfield?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tim
|
|
« Reply #147 on: January 05, 2010, 15:58:56 » |
|
is no. 7 Trowbridge? It does have a modernish building like that (in a similar brown style to platform 1 of Didcot IIRC▸ )
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #148 on: January 05, 2010, 15:59:22 » |
|
having just realised that we are not necessaily operating in FGW▸ -land and that scotland is a possibility, I can say fairly confidently that No 11 is a pier of the Forth Bridge.
It is indeed, at South Queensferry. Of the twelve pictures we started with, 9 are within what I would describe as "FGW-land"; the question stated that they're all in "Great Britain" so I have not included any of the pictures I took in Northern Ireland last year
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #149 on: January 05, 2010, 16:00:29 » |
|
is no. 7 Trowbridge? It does have a modernish building like that (in a similar brown style to platform 1 of Didcot IIRC▸ )
Yes, it is!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
|