ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #120 on: January 12, 2010, 09:45:06 » |
|
I'm following up to ensure suitable access is maintained at all times for the less mobile - maybe by allowing some blue badge parking outside the access / egress to the downside platform too.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #121 on: January 12, 2010, 13:03:13 » |
|
A bit of work getting under way this week, to replace the lifts installed 20 years ago when the footbridge was built
I was a little surprised to hear that they were being replaced so soon. Is twenty years really the average life-span of a lift? There was also quite a delay - between 1 and 2 years I think - between the footbridge opening and the lifts finally being installed. I think BR▸ had committed to providing lifts, but in a less enlightened age, were less than keen to keep their promise! As Will says the old dank smelly subway is now sealed off with metal covers on the platforms, but I think it still serves a useful role carrying electrical cables.
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
|
|
|
Tim
|
|
« Reply #122 on: January 12, 2010, 13:21:05 » |
|
I'm following up to ensure suitable access is maintained at all times for the less mobile - maybe by allowing some blue badge parking outside the access / egress to the downside platform too.
FGW▸ 's website report that exit/entrance will be available from platform 2 to the road behind the station for those passengers requiring it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #123 on: January 12, 2010, 13:47:11 » |
|
Yes, I know - but nothing about pick up / set down....
Hopefully for not long though....
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
willc
|
|
« Reply #124 on: January 12, 2010, 23:18:38 » |
|
But in all honesty Chris, I don't think there's a problem with anyone rolling up at the back of platform 2 and parking for a while to drop off and pick up - lots of people do it in the mornings and evenings to avoid having to try to drive round to the main entrance. And I don't think anyone has a clue about who is responsible for enforcing whatever restrictions there are in Roger Dudman Way, which leads a twilight zone existence as part railway access to platform 2 and the BTP▸ office and catering stores that side, and part public access to Turbo Ted's nursery and the university accommodation on former railway land beyond that, plus being part of a cycle route to Jericho. There are various notices dating back to BR▸ days about enforcement of waiting restrictions but none I can see indicating what such restrictions may be, nor have I ever seen any sign that FGW▸ or Network Rail is employing clampers there. An old Oxford Mail report on the bizarre nature of Roger Dudman Way is here http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/1663603.___Strangest____city_street_needs_major_clean_up/I'm not sure that they have actually made much progress towards achieving the things councillor Pressel wanted back in 2007.
|
|
« Last Edit: January 12, 2010, 23:27:39 by willc »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #125 on: January 13, 2010, 10:08:46 » |
|
I'm concerned that space is reserved for the less mobiloe and not taken up by lazy commuters....
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
willc
|
|
« Reply #126 on: January 13, 2010, 23:27:03 » |
|
Always seem to be spaces there, as I say most are simply dropping off and picking up, so not hanging around.
Anyway, at the rate the contractors are going, the work may not take until March. They were cutting up the remains of the lifts simultaneously in both shafts gone 6pm tonight.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Andy
|
|
« Reply #127 on: February 03, 2010, 17:11:26 » |
|
Can't they be "re-cycled" in some way?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
willc
|
|
« Reply #128 on: March 21, 2010, 13:20:35 » |
|
The new footbridge lifts have been use for the past few days.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
willc
|
|
« Reply #129 on: March 26, 2010, 23:55:58 » |
|
Photographer Martin Loader has just uploaded a photograph taken at Oxford in 1990 of a Reading-Bicester train with the then gleaming new station and the footbridge in its original form - without the lifts. How times have changed. See http://www.hondawanderer.com/L409_Oxford_1990.htm
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #130 on: March 27, 2010, 09:07:57 » |
|
You don't see many 3-car trains going to Bicester now - and look at all those litter bins...
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #131 on: March 27, 2010, 14:25:57 » |
|
Photographer Martin Loader has just uploaded a photograph taken at Oxford in 1990 of a Reading-Bicester train with the then gleaming new station and the footbridge in its original form - without the lifts. How times have changed. See http://www.hondawanderer.com/L409_Oxford_1990.htmI too noticed that yesterday, was interested to see how new it is!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #132 on: April 07, 2010, 19:45:39 » |
|
From the Oxford Mail: All change for new-look Oxford platform
These images of how a planned new platform at Oxford railway station could look, has been released as part of public consultation. Oxfordshire County Council is inviting the public to comment on the ^10m scheme at its website or by picking up details of the plan from the passenger information desk at the station, where details are on display. The new platform, south of Botley Road on part of the station^s long-stay car park, off Becket Street, will be used by services between the city and London, with the aim of reducing delays caused by shunting trains between the station^s existing platforms and the sidings north of the station. The platform, inset, will be connected to the main station building by a new covered footbridge over Botley Road. Huw Jones, Oxfordshire County Council^s director for environment and economy, said: ^We^re very excited about this project and looking forward to hearing what people think.^ If planning permission is granted, construction could start next year. The deadline for comments is April 26. For further details on the station scheme, go to myconsultations.oxfordshire.gov.uk
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #134 on: April 08, 2010, 20:46:20 » |
|
From the BBC» : Passengers see ^12m Oxford Station plans
Rail passengers are being asked for their opinions on ^12m plans to upgrade Oxford Station. They include building a new platform on the existing long-stay car park and a new footbridge with a covered walkway over Botley Road. The county council and Network Rail are funding the scheme and want it completed by 2012 if planning permission is granted later this year. Displays will be on show at the station until 26 April. There was a mixed reaction among rail users interviewed by the BBC at the station about the plans. Sumit Chakradorty welcomed the prospect of a new platform. He said: "It would be good for the image of Oxford and make it a better experience for commuters." But another passenger, Phil Dodd, questioned whether the level of investment was needed. He said: "It's only about 10 years since they refurbished the station. It's a nice scheme but is it really necessary?" Mark Harwood supported the idea. He said: "Public transport is massively important. Anything that increases rail options has to be good."
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
|