Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 19:55 29 Apr 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 05/05/25 - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
29th Apr (1963)
Bristol Bus Boycott announced (*)

Train RunningCancelled
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
21:11 Gloucester to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
15:50 Penzance to Gloucester
16:50 Penzance to Cardiff Central
Delayed
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 21:26 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 29, 2025, 20:12:31 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[159] What and why - on the platform
[125] Longer distance canal walks - public transport for one way sec...
[121] Doublebagging, Rawdoggers, Barebackers
[87] Chiltern Railways: an update on rolling stock / services
[85] Driving licences and tests - ongoing discussion, merged topics
[36] Shipping services across the Severn
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Super Express or Revamped HST for Great Western? Options  (Read 8969 times)
woody
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 525


View Profile
« on: November 25, 2009, 12:46:35 »

Read the following on another forum "Despite Hitachi announcing yesterday that it expected to sign a deal
on the Super Express by March 2010, Railway Eye appears to cast doubt
on the order, commenting that DfT» (Department for Transport - about) is looking to extend the life of the
Great Western HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) beyond 2030."
 What do you think.http://groups.google.com.au/group/uk.railway/browse_thread/thread/b2d7fdb9d2bd4947?hl=en#
Logged
dog box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 653


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 25, 2009, 12:58:46 »

Revamped HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) please....and when or if electrification happens mk 4 or 5? coaches with electric loco and dvt to bristol and then swop the electric for a diesel loco
The super expess bi mode thingy is just a plain stupid idea. there  is enough rubbish running about at the moment Voyagers, 180s without addding more
Logged

All postings reflect my own personal views and opinions and are not intended to be, nor should be taken as official statements of first great western or first group policy
Kingfisherdart
Full Member
***
Posts: 61



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 25, 2009, 16:03:17 »

How about building a new HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) fleet to the same design, with modern day improvements?
Logged
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: November 25, 2009, 16:16:51 »

How about building a new HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) fleet to the same design, with modern day improvements?

couldnt agree more build it in the uk electric doors like the mk4 thats basically the main problem with the hst why mess with a classic?
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4531


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 25, 2009, 16:51:27 »

mmmmmm that'll make the oldest coaches and power cars 52 years old in 2030, the equivalent today of traveling in a Mk1 with a warship or western hauling it or even a classic DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit).
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
matt473
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 374


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: November 25, 2009, 16:55:22 »

I would personally love to see a new generation of unpowerred coaches in between two power cars as this is a quiet and extremely pleasent way of travelling in my opinion. It would also benefit the whole network if this route was followed as this would enable a new generation coaching stock to purchased all over the network allowing for more flexible loco hauled services on suitable services in the future such as cross country so that coaches can be added or taken away in busy persiods.
Logged
onthecushions
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 979


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: November 25, 2009, 16:57:59 »

Certainly the Mark 3's should not be thrown away, with the credit crunch hanging over everything.

The re-use of the (Mark 3) Class 319 emu's was no doubt critical in justifying the Oxford and Newbury suburban electrification. A GW» (Great Western - used as an abbreviation for the area / lines under the Great Western franchise, as opposed to FGW which includes "First", the company operating them too. For tickets - about) mainline scheme had then only to start from Didcot Junction...

The 133 Irish Rail (IE) Mark 3 coaches have begun to be scrapped. They have swing plug doors - surely a worthwhile purchase - why not re-import the lot?

An HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) for the future could exist in diesel and electric forms. Using the MTU (Motor Traction Unit) power cars to their full engine rating would allow 1 or 2 more trailers; equally an electric loco of 5 - 6 MW at rail could cope with 12 trailers.

The Mark 3's only need replacing (and then should be cascaded elsewhere) when serious speed increases are contemplated for the GW.

Thoughts..

OTC
Logged
onthecushions
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 979


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: November 25, 2009, 17:04:27 »

mmmmmm that'll make the oldest coaches and power cars 52 years old in 2030, the equivalent today of traveling in a Mk1 with a warship or western hauling it or even a classic DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit).

Didn't the Southern's 3 and 4-SUB units run from 1915 to 1983 and still be serviceable on withdrawal?

Regards,

OTC
Logged
RichardB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1029


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 25, 2009, 17:29:28 »

mmmmmm that'll make the oldest coaches and power cars 52 years old in 2030, the equivalent today of traveling in a Mk1 with a warship or western hauling it or even a classic DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit).

Didn't the Southern's 3 and 4-SUB units run from 1915 to 1983 and still be serviceable on withdrawal?

Regards,

OTC

No, the 4 SUBS dated from 1948.  They were still pretty solid on withdrawal though.



 
Logged
devonian
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 135


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: November 25, 2009, 17:43:40 »

mmmmmm that'll make the oldest coaches and power cars 52 years old in 2030, the equivalent today of traveling in a Mk1 with a warship or western hauling it or even a classic DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit).

Didn't the Southern's 3 and 4-SUB units run from 1915 to 1983 and still be serviceable on withdrawal?

Regards,

OTC

No, the 4 SUBS dated from 1948.  They were still pretty solid on withdrawal though.



 


They were bouncy as hell though. And cold!
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43927



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #10 on: November 25, 2009, 17:50:34 »

On old stock ... there are still passenger trains dating back to 1938 on the national network.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4531


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: November 25, 2009, 18:05:40 »

On old stock ... there are still passenger trains dating back to 1938 on the national network.
Bit of a fudge that one  Wink they do run on what could be classed as light rail, oh and the infrastructure is maintained by the TOC (Train Operating Company)

The Mk3 and class 43 have served the railway way beyond what they were conceived to do, the HSDT (Original name for High Speed Train)'s were the 1970's BRB (British Railways Board, or 'be right back', depending on context)'s stop gap to full main line electrification here we are 40 years on and finally we have a rail industry that looks like it will deliver it, it will be a hideous mistake for the politicians to stop it.  But lets not have our mainline railway system looking more like a heritage railway (nothing wrong with heritage railways I might add) than where it should be back as the world leader
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Kingfisherdart
Full Member
***
Posts: 61



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: November 25, 2009, 18:36:32 »

The difference between the 4-SUBs and the current HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) stock, is that the HSTs are still modern to travel on - and indeed, better to travel on than many modern trains. So why change the basic design?
Logged
moonrakerz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 536



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: November 25, 2009, 18:45:40 »

Build some new HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)), with modern technology in them - Brilliant trains !
Logged
Andy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 559



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: November 25, 2009, 18:56:07 »

mmmmmm that'll make the oldest coaches and power cars 52 years old in 2030, the equivalent today of traveling in a Mk1 with a warship or western hauling it or even a classic DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit).

That's an unfair comparison because the conditions were so much better: there were no mobiles/electronic devices constantly making noise, no incessant announcements and seats aligned with big windows that opened then! Wink 
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page