eightf48544
|
|
« Reply #120 on: January 15, 2010, 14:13:53 » |
|
Re Moor Street. I did see a proposal possibly in Modern Railways and possibly by West Midlands PTE▸ (or current body) to link Moor Street to the Midland Camp Hill Line with a triangular junction. There would be extra terminal platforms.
It was definitely for suburban traffic and not HS2▸ I thought that the High speed station in Birmingham was likely to be near where the proposed new Heartlands station was going to be.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #121 on: January 15, 2010, 14:16:00 » |
|
Re Moor Street. I did see a proposal possibly in Modern Railways and possibly by West Midlands PTE▸ (or current body) to link Moor Street to the Midland Camp Hill Line with a triangular junction. There would be extra terminal platforms.
It was definitely for suburban traffic and not HS2▸ I thought that the High speed station in Birmingham was likely to be near where the proposed new Heartlands station was going to be.
Yes, they proposing for the Camp Hill services to use Moor Street, as well as Tamworth locals and perhaps Cardiff - Nottingham services. Combined with Chiltern, this will fill the terminal platforms. There is NO way HS2 will use Moor Street.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
IanC
|
|
« Reply #122 on: January 15, 2010, 22:08:13 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #123 on: January 15, 2010, 22:35:12 » |
|
Thanks for the link, Ian. What do we see in the opening shot at Birmingham Moor Street? Two Class 165's passing each other, when ALL services from Moor Street should be Clubman 168's. Now that's an all too common situation and something they'll have to get a grip of if schedules are going to be maintained when it's a largely 100mph route!
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #124 on: January 15, 2010, 22:57:40 » |
|
The video hints in won't all be ready by December. So it looks like we'll have to wait 2 years for the improvements.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #126 on: January 16, 2010, 01:36:23 » |
|
The reporter (with accompanying graphics) states that Virgin serve Northampton. Well technically yeah, but one train a day from Rugby to Euston and another from Brum, set down only last thing at night. Hardly a service..... London Midland didn't get a mention. Brum folk are lucky indeed to have three operators offering direct regular services to The Smoke. In the west we have to make do with 1^ operators direct to London at best.
|
|
« Last Edit: January 16, 2010, 01:45:25 by bignosemac »
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #127 on: January 16, 2010, 11:05:44 » |
|
The reporter (with accompanying graphics) states that Virgin serve Northampton. Well technically yeah, but one train a day from Rugby to Euston and another from Brum, set down only last thing at night. Hardly a service..... London Midland didn't get a mention. Brum folk are lucky indeed to have three operators offering direct regular services to The Smoke. In the west we have to make do with 1^ operators direct to London at best. The LM▸ service is hardly for InterCity travellers - it's just two commuter lines joined up. Esp when Virgin offer CHEAPER (^5) advances than LM (^6) - although LM offer a good ^15 Super Off Peak return.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Chafford1
|
|
« Reply #129 on: January 16, 2010, 14:41:14 » |
|
Thanks for the link, Ian. What do we see in the opening shot at Birmingham Moor Street? Two Class 165's passing each other, when ALL services from Moor Street should be Clubman 168's. Now that's an all too common situation and something they'll have to get a grip of if schedules are going to be maintained when it's a largely 100mph route! They'll be using the refurbished Mk3 coaches referred to on the Modern Railways website (hauled by 67s and DVTs‡?) so there shouldn't be a problen under the new schedules.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
John R
|
|
« Reply #130 on: January 16, 2010, 18:25:49 » |
|
Are these coaches in addition to the W&S▸ stock? All the Press Releases are very vague about the stock they'll be using, but then I guess they might not wish to publicise using 30 year old stock, as the general public may not consider that to be very positive (although those in the know realise how good Mk 3 stock is).
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
gwr2006
|
|
« Reply #131 on: January 16, 2010, 19:16:20 » |
|
Thanks for the link, Ian.
What do we see in the opening shot at Birmingham Moor Street? Two Class 165's passing each other, when ALL services from Moor Street should be Clubman 168's. Now that's an all too common situation and something they'll have to get a grip of if schedules are going to be maintained when it's a largely 100mph route!
This was the 12:55 service to London Marylebone which ambled into Moor Street 18 minutes late at 13:13 despite the platform display showing it as on time and no reason given. My limited experience of Chiltern was that even though people don't admit it, they too have problems operating a perfect railway! Perhaps they also need to do something about their staitons - Banbury is such a cold, unwelcoming place to change trains!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
willc
|
|
« Reply #132 on: January 16, 2010, 19:41:33 » |
|
Was quite clear looking at the train running page on Chiltern's site over recent days that, in common with other operators, they were having rolling stock problems at times, with a number of short-formed services noted, plus Bicester services turning back at Princes Risborough to recover delays. So, no, they haven't quite cracked walking on water just yet.
And to be fair, there are still a few Birmingham-London services booked for 165s, even if not those caught on camera by the BBC» .
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #133 on: January 16, 2010, 19:48:25 » |
|
The reporter (with accompanying graphics) states that Virgin serve Northampton. Well technically yeah, but one train a day from Rugby to Euston and another from Brum, set down only last thing at night. Hardly a service..... London Midland didn't get a mention. Brum folk are lucky indeed to have three operators offering direct regular services to The Smoke. In the west we have to make do with 1^ operators direct to London at best. The LM▸ service is hardly for InterCity travellers - it's just two commuter lines joined up. Esp when Virgin offer CHEAPER (^5) advances than LM (^6) - although LM offer a good ^15 Super Off Peak return. LM is the InterCity sevice if you live in Northampton. Virgin certainly isn't!
|
|
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
Chafford1
|
|
« Reply #134 on: January 16, 2010, 20:18:20 » |
|
Are these coaches in addition to the W&S▸ stock? All the Press Releases are very vague about the stock they'll be using, but then I guess they might not wish to publicise using 30 year old stock, as the general public may not consider that to be very positive (although those in the know realise how good Mk 3 stock is).
Yes, these will be additional coaches. This month's Modern Railways notes that Delta Rail has produced a plan for Chiltern to extensively refurbish Mk3s, possibly including power operated doors, retention toilets (I should hope so!) accessible for wheelchairs, new seating and interiors, CCTV▸ , power operated doors between vehicles and computer sockets.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|