Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:35 10 Jan 2025
 
- Two million discounted tickets up for grabs in rail sale
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 14/01/25 - Rail Sale starts
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
10th Jan (2017)
Defibrillators discussion pack published by Network Rail (link)

Train RunningCancelled
23:03 Salisbury to Portsmouth & Southsea
23:14 London Paddington to Oxford
Short Run
22:50 Salisbury to Portsmouth Harbour
Delayed
19:04 London Paddington to Penzance
20:20 Carmarthen to Bristol Parkway
23:42 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 23:46:07 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[109] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[96] Westminster Hall debate : Railway services to South West
[59] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[53] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[49] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[38] GWR Advance Purchase sale - January 2025
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
Author Topic: DB complain about ATW's London services  (Read 10877 times)
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6556


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: October 27, 2009, 11:15:30 »

Welcome to the forum ChrisB
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: October 27, 2009, 11:26:47 »


There ain't much point in my opinion spending all this money on ETRMS if the service level on the Cambrian is going to stay the same.

I thought the ETRMS was being fitted to the Cambrian precisely because it has very few trains.  This makes it lower risk for a trial which might go wrong.  If and when ETRMS is working well and bringing down operational costs it might make sense to increase services
Logged
autotank
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 241


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: October 27, 2009, 12:00:53 »


There ain't much point in my opinion spending all this money on ETRMS if the service level on the Cambrian is going to stay the same.

I thought the ETRMS was being fitted to the Cambrian precisely because it has very few trains.  This makes it lower risk for a trial which might go wrong.  If and when ETRMS is working well and bringing down operational costs it might make sense to increase services

It's not brand new technology - they are already using it in on the continent aren't they? There shouldn't be that many teething problems introducing it to the Cambrian surely?

The trains to Aber are often wedged, especially in the Summer - the infrastructure needs to be used more! Surely the cost of extra trains is small compared to the annual maintenance bill of the 60-70 miles of line through relatively sparse country.
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: October 27, 2009, 13:52:08 »


And that DB» (Deutsche Bahn - German State Railway - about) threat of pulling out of WSMR (Wrexham, Shropshire and Marylebone Railway) isn't serious, either. IMHO (in my humble opinion).

I'm not sure. I suspect the economics are on a knife edge, hence the consolidation with Chiltern.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13034


View Profile Email
« Reply #19 on: October 27, 2009, 14:01:42 »

They'll suffer more if Virgin return to Wrexham. And that must have taken into account already - and they're still running.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10365


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: October 27, 2009, 14:56:42 »

With respect, Will, the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) application to move WSMR (Wrexham, Shropshire and Marylebone Railway) under Chiltern does include the ability to run 168s as alternative stock to their loco & coaches. Although as WSMR are proud of their use of the latter, I'm not sure the intention is to use many 168s.....

I agree. It would strike me as a sensible operational safeguard to have, if for example the booked Class 67 or DVT(resolve) fails at Marylebone then they might well be able to rustle up a 168 to run all or part of the way as a substitute. Also, in the event of engineering work, it would allow the loco hauled set to work from, say, Wrexham to Wolverhampton and a Class 168 operate from Tame Bridge to Marylebone.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: October 27, 2009, 16:13:12 »

The whole point of the Cambrian upgrade is to allow for an hourly service on this heavily congested route! Put instead, ATW (Arriva Trains Wales (former TOC (Train Operating Company))) are going to waste stock by running to London and thus waste the upgrade.

I'm not sure what Chiltern's plans are for rolling stock. As you say, they can't run 2tph to Oxford with the 168s unless other stock is used on B'hams. I would think that they'll use loco + coaches on several services to free up 168s. They won't use 165s as (a) they are cutting the journey down by 20 mins, so will need 100 mph trains.

Willc, the differentials between loco + coaches and 168s has been diminished since recent upgrades, and will be eliminated within a year. For most of the route it will be 100 mph for all.

I was under the impression that direct Stratford trains were being reduced, that's why I said most 165s will stop at HW. Oxford and B'ham trains will be 168/loco, what else will be 165 north of HW?
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13034


View Profile Email
« Reply #22 on: October 27, 2009, 16:22:33 »

Go check that new (73rd) Track Access Application on the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) website here - you'll see what other services they are running - it won't just be 2tph Birmingham & 2tph Oxford north of Wycombe, that's for sure!
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: October 27, 2009, 16:34:08 »

Go check that new (73rd) Track Access Application on the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) website here - you'll see what other services they are running - it won't just be 2tph Birmingham & 2tph Oxford north of Wycombe, that's for sure!

Just have, the new timetable will be terrific! I can't wait...
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: October 28, 2009, 00:53:22 »

Quote
With respect, Will, the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) application to move WSMR (Wrexham, Shropshire and Marylebone Railway) under Chiltern does include the ability to run 168s as alternative stock to their loco & coaches. Although as WSMR are proud of their use of the latter, I'm not sure the intention is to use many 168s.....

With respect Chris and II, I know they are asking for consent to use 168s but they have been adamant that they will continue to offer first class and restaurant service, which would be rather hard with a 168 - indeed they are now asking if standard class passengers would be interested in booking an at-seat meal in advance, formalising the slightly ad hoc arrangements that they operate at present, see http://www.wrexhamandshropshire.co.uk/catering-form.php - and the current issue of Modern Railways says the following "the company insists the use of 168s would not be a regular occurrence as they do not have first class accommodation".

Quote
Willc, the differentials between loco + coaches and 168s has been diminished since recent upgrades, and will be eliminated within a year. For most of the route it will be 100 mph for all.

I was under the impression that direct Stratford trains were being reduced, that's why I said most 165s will stop at HW. Oxford and B'ham trains will be 168/loco, what else will be 165 north of HW?

The differentials are not about what the maximum line speed is - a Class 67's acceleration is different to lightweight DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit), as is its braking, and as I said last night, if there are places where there are concerns about the impact of locos on track or embankments - a particular issue much of the way from Princes Risborough to Aynho, hence the recent extensive work south of Bicester and the huge bills for redoubling a few years back - then again locos have to run at lower speeds.

Do you read other people's posts? I only ask because I said last night many services which turn back at Bicester and Banbury - or start at Banbury in the morning and end there in the evening - are 165s. If anyone wants a clearer picture of what units work which Chiltern services, then go to the following link on the December timetable that was put out for consulation, open up the pdfs and look at the top of the column for each train, where the type of unit allocated is printed http://www.chilternrailways.co.uk/news/news-archive/ttconsult-dmr09/

Quote
The whole point of the Cambrian upgrade is to allow for an hourly service

Er, no. Yes, the Cambrian line upgrade will allow an hourly service - as yet unfunded by the Welsh Assembly government, which so far only aspires to start it by 2011 - but you could say the same thing about the Cotswold Line redoubling.

Just as the Cotswold scheme offers benefits above and beyond simply allowing an hourly service, so does the Cambrian upgrade, with major work at Dovey junction to raise the tracks to reduce the threat of closures due to flooding, along with reinstatement of the loop there, extending the Welshpool loop, level crossing improvements and replacement of the life-expired radio signalling with ERTMS (European Rail Traffic Management System.) - all helping provide a more robust, reliable, punctual service, whatever the frequency, just like the Cotswold scheme.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #25 on: October 28, 2009, 22:54:19 »

No. I spoke to an ATW (Arriva Trains Wales (former TOC (Train Operating Company))) guard a few years ago when the work was starting, and he said that it was for an hourly service to alleviate the overcrowding.

And Chiltern say that the acceleration of the loco is similar to a 168.
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: October 29, 2009, 00:31:34 »

I'll ask again. Do you read other people's posts?

No-one disputes the work will allow an hourly service and that's a key aim - if the WAG» (Welsh Assembly Government - about) cough up for its operating costs - but there's more involved in the overall project, which, according to Network Rail, should deliver a projected 5% improvement in the route's public performance measure once the work is complete.

For example, raising the track and platform at Dovey junction is nothing whatever to do with operating an hourly service. But take that out of the package and you would continue to have closures of the line when there would be no trains an hour, sometimes for several days, due to the flooding that bit of work will help to tackle.

And the upgrade work began 18 months ago, not a few years ago.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #27 on: October 29, 2009, 01:15:24 »


And the upgrade work began 18 months ago, not a few years ago.


That really is splitting hairs willc. I admire your dogged investigation into this topic, but please cut Btline a bit of slack. An alternative point of view is what makes the topic interesting. Nit-picking isn't.
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #28 on: October 29, 2009, 03:01:13 »

*tongue firmly in cheek*

18 months and ten days, actually. It's in a local paper so must be true.
http://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north-wales-news/2008/03/29/13m-rail-upgrade-starts-next-month-55578-20689960/
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: October 29, 2009, 09:18:59 »

Network Rail website actually...
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page