paul7575
|
|
« Reply #45 on: September 30, 2009, 16:39:41 » |
|
Valid points have been made in the article, if people bother to read it. Standing on any form of Transport should be addressed, something which some TOC▸ 's have failed to do. Seem to remember SWT▸ taking seats out of their suburban stock to allow more standing passengers. God forbid we have another incident like 10 years ago, with a full and standing train.
Are you seriously suggesting there should be no standing on any public transport? How are you going to enforce that on local buses, trams, tube etc? So why not have standing on suburban trains? If you wanted no one standing on longer distance intercity trains, you'd have to make them 100% reserved, which would be fairly impractical for all those commuters using intercity services over part of their routes... Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #46 on: September 30, 2009, 16:49:58 » |
|
It is unrealistic for there to be no standing. Otherwise we'd have to have mega long and frequent trains in the peaks, which would then just sit in sidings for the rest of the day. Not cost effective.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
inspector_blakey
|
|
« Reply #47 on: September 30, 2009, 16:55:31 » |
|
Quite right.
Virtually all of Amtrak's trains are fully reserved which, combined with the extortionate fares they charge unless you book in advance (e.g. Trenton NJ to Philadelphia PA▸ , $50 for a 30-minute journey) makes walk-up travel a near impossibility. The flexibility that many rail fares will give you in the UK▸ simply doesn't exist here. I'd far rather have that flexibility and have to stand occasionally.
And the issue of standing on a train being less safe than sitting is a complete red herring. It's been studied extensively in the past (can't remember off the top of my head if it was the RSSB▸ or the HSE▸ ); the conclusion drawn was that standing is an issue of comfort, not safety, and I tend to agree.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #48 on: September 30, 2009, 17:46:52 » |
|
Valid points have been made in the article, if people bother to read it. Standing on any form of Transport should be addressed, something which some TOC▸ 's have failed to do. Seem to remember SWT▸ taking seats out of their suburban stock to allow more standing passengers. God forbid we have another incident like 10 years ago, with a full and standing train.
What happened in 1999 with a full and standing train? Can you jog my memory? If it's a reference to Ladbroke Grove then the nature of that accident with its fire and a high closing speed had little bearing on the injuries suffered by passengers, whether seated or not. modified to add apostrophe to the first 'its'. I know from experience on this forum that this kind of thing is important!
|
|
« Last Edit: September 30, 2009, 23:28:17 by bignosemac »
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #49 on: September 30, 2009, 19:19:53 » |
|
And you could argue that a full and standing train is safer for passengers in the event of a collision!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
super tm
|
|
« Reply #50 on: September 30, 2009, 19:55:10 » |
|
If standing was a safety issue then all passengers would be made to stay in their seats for the whole journey, there would be no trolley service or buffet service and no guard could walk up and down the train checking tickets etc.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Phil
|
|
« Reply #51 on: September 30, 2009, 20:24:04 » |
|
If standing was a safety issue then all passengers would be made to stay in their seats for the whole journey, there would be no trolley service or buffet service and no guard could walk up and down the train checking tickets etc.
Except during take off and on the approach to a station, obviously. (though sometimes, TOCs▸ seem so utterly in thrall of the airline industry that I fully expect "customer hosts" to stand at the front of the carriage and demonstrate emergency procedures at any moment. Next thing we know they'll be charging for baggage...)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #52 on: September 30, 2009, 23:18:29 » |
|
Yes, we'll need seat belts and oxygen supplies at each seat. God, I hope no EU» Health and Safety bureaucrats are reading this - I wouldn't put it past Brussels!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #53 on: September 30, 2009, 23:24:48 » |
|
(....... Next thing we know they'll be charging for baggage...)
Sshhh.... don't go giving TOCs▸ ideas!
|
|
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
caliwag
|
|
« Reply #54 on: October 01, 2009, 21:28:24 » |
|
I seem to recall a shopper being charged for extra bags a few year ago...in the days of Regional railways (bloody BR▸ ) I'm sure it was somewhere near Stamford... incredible. Once the press got hold of it, it was quietly dropped. Anybody shed any light on it...absolute shame!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
inspector_blakey
|
|
« Reply #55 on: October 01, 2009, 21:32:52 » |
|
There are actually limits to what you can take on board with you (and always have been, it's not something recent). The Accompanied Animals and Articles (AAA) conditions are, I think, an additional document to the conditions of carriage that can be inspected at stations. Tickets can (or used to be) issued for luggage in excess of the allowance, with status AAA printed on them. There have to be rules of some sort covering luggage, otherwise people will just try taking the p*ss... http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/devon/6588209.stm
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mookiemoo
|
|
« Reply #56 on: October 01, 2009, 21:35:42 » |
|
There are actually limits to what you can take on board with you (and always have been, it's not something recent). The Accompanied Animals and Articles (AAA) conditions are, I think, an additional document to the conditions of carriage that can be inspected at stations. Tickets can (or used to be) issued for luggage in excess of the allowance, with status AAA printed on them. There have to be rules of some sort covering luggage, otherwise people will just try taking the p*ss... http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/devon/6588209.stmSo was I taking the piss with one carry on bag and two suitcases - one which weighed 56lbs and one which weighed 69lbs? Had to have help hauling them on the train.......and off again. When I departed these shores they were empty - combined weight 30lbs! I damn sure would not have been happy having to buy separate tickets for them!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."
"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #57 on: October 01, 2009, 21:43:02 » |
|
There are actually limits to what you can take on board with you (and always have been, it's not something recent). The Accompanied Animals and Articles (AAA) conditions are, I think, an additional document to the conditions of carriage that can be inspected at stations. Tickets can (or used to be) issued for luggage in excess of the allowance, with status AAA printed on them. There have to be rules of some sort covering luggage, otherwise people will just try taking the p*ss... http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/devon/6588209.stmSo was I taking the piss with one carry on bag and two suitcases - one which weighed 56lbs and one which weighed 69lbs? Had to have help hauling them on the train.......and off again. When I departed these shores they were empty - combined weight 30lbs! I damn sure would not have been happy having to buy separate tickets for them! One wonders what the 95lbs additional weight on your return to these shores was. Do we need to inform HM Revenue and Customs?
|
|
« Last Edit: October 01, 2009, 22:04:08 by bignosemac »
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #58 on: October 01, 2009, 21:48:03 » |
|
They do say that you should be able to carry them yourself.
I don't know how many lbs you're allowed to bring on. I take it on a Pacer it is less lest the engine breaks down.
Is their a weight restriction (e.g. most airlines are about 50 lbs)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
inspector_blakey
|
|
« Reply #59 on: October 01, 2009, 21:57:25 » |
|
Ah, but appendix B, covering AAA, goes into excruciating details about whats allowed... APPENDIX B ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS FOR LUGGAGE, ARTICLES, ANIMALS AND CYCLES Conveyance of Luggage and Articles in Passenger Accommodation 1. Passenger accommodation in these Conditions means the parts of trains with seats or sleeper berths including luggage stowage areas above, beneath and behind seats and adjacent to doorways. 2. Condition 46 allows you to take small items of Luggage and Articles into the passenger accommodation of a train. Small items are considered to be those with dimensions not exceeding 90 x 70 x 30 cm with a weight not exceeding 50kg. Each passenger (aged 5 years or more) may take three small items into a train free of charge, however, the dimensions of only two of these items may exceed 55 x 40 x 20 cm. 21 3. A fee not exceeding half the adult fare for your journey is charged for: ● each additional item in excess of a passenger^s free allowance; and ● any item with dimensions exceeding 90 x 70 x 30 cm. 4. A Train Company may refuse to accept Luggage or Articles in passenger accommodation if any of the following apply: ● the restrictions listed in Condition 49 apply; ● the item would obstruct doorways, gangways or corridors; ● the dimensions of the item exceed 100 x 100 x 100 cm; or ● in the opinion of the Train Company^s staff, the item is only suitable to be conveyed in a luggage van. 5. For wheelchairs please refer to the table ^Luggage and Miscellaneous Articles^ Conveyance of Luggage and Articles in Luggage Vans 6. A luggage van, in these Conditions, means the part of some trains provided specially to convey parcels, packages, cycles and larger items of Luggage. 7. Under Condition 47 the Train Companies may convey larger items of Luggage and Articles in a luggage van, if one is available. Items with dimensions exceeding 150 x 150 x 100 cm, or with a weight exceeding 75kg, will not be accepted. A fee not exceeding half the adult fare for your journey is charged for each item. 22 Your Maximum Free Luggage / Articles Allowance 90 x 70 x 30 cm maximum dimensions and 50kg maximum weight 90 x 70 x 30 cm maximum dimensions and 50kg maximum weight 55 x 40 x 20 cm maximum dimensions and 50kg maximum weight + + 8. Luggage and Articles conveyed in a luggage van must be clearly labelled with your name, address and destination station. Staff will not release the items to you until you have proved ownership. 9. A Train Company may refuse to accept Luggage or Articles in a luggage van if any of the restrictions listed in Condition 49 apply. 10. For wheelchairs please refer to the table ^Luggage and Miscellaneous Articles^. Animals 11. You may take dogs and small animals with you into the passenger accommodation of trains. Animals, with the exception of blind or deaf persons^ assistance dogs at the discretion of the steward, may not be taken into buffet or restaurant cars. Animals are not generally allowed in sleeper compartments, however dogs may be conveyed in sleeper cabins with the permission of the Train Company. You should apply for such permission at least 48 hours before you travel. 12. Except for dogs, animals must be conveyed in a fully enclosed basket or pet carrier designed for this purpose with dimensions not exceeding 85 x 60 x 60 cm. Baskets and pet carriers must be large enough to allow the animal to stand and lie down in comfort. Animals which are too large for a basket or pet carrier with dimensions 85 x 60 x 60 cm may not be conveyed by train. 13. Two animals may accompany you on trains free of charge. 14. A fee not exceeding half the adult fare for your journey is charged for each additional animal in excess of a passenger^s free allowance. 15. An animal may be conveyed in a train^s luggage van, if one is available. A dog should be muzzled and its lead securely fastened as directed by Train Company staff. Baskets and pet carriers must be secure. Dogs and any baskets or pet 23 Your Maximum Free Animal Allowance 85 x 60 x 60cm maximum dimensions 85 x 60 x 60cm maximum dimensions + carriers must be clearly labelled with your name, address and destination station. Staff will not hand over animals until you have proved ownership. 16. Dogs must be kept on a lead throughout your journey; other animals must not be taken out of their baskets or pet carriers. If your dog or other animal causes a nuisance or inconvenience to other passengers you may be asked to remove it from a train or railway premises by the Train Company or Rail Service Company staff. The tables below are a guide to the conveyance of luggage, articles and animals by train.
I've just done a quick "cut and paste" so not all the tables are in this, the ones that are are mangled and the diagrams are missing. If you really care then check out the NRCoC▸ online pdf, pp. 21-26, http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/times_fares/nrcc/index_custom.html. I was amused to note that the carriage of livestock is specifically prohibited.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|