Super Guard
|
|
« Reply #15 on: August 02, 2009, 10:43:02 » |
|
Seems Dft have not however with the ending of SouthWest Trains through working to Paignton soon.
Bad decision that IMHO▸ Naturally, I agree. Its always nice to return from Exeter on a respectable train! And are you saying Exeters premier bus fleet isn't respectable?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Any opinions made on this forum are purely personal and my own. I am in no way speaking for, or offering the views of First Great Western or First Group.
If my employer feels I have broken any aspect of the Social Media Policy, please PM me immediately, so I can rectify without delay.
|
|
|
eightf48544
|
|
« Reply #16 on: August 02, 2009, 11:30:00 » |
|
1135 Paddington - Newquay certainly wasn't fully reserved. Only 150 people offloaded when 43132 broke at Par and was subsequently dumped in the down sidings.
How did they get the passengers to Newquay?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
slippy
|
|
« Reply #17 on: August 02, 2009, 12:36:09 » |
|
1135 Paddington - Newquay certainly wasn't fully reserved. Only 150 people offloaded when 43132 broke at Par and was subsequently dumped in the down sidings.
How did they get the passengers to Newquay? Next service to St.Austell then by bus........
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #18 on: August 02, 2009, 13:47:04 » |
|
If SWT▸ have spare DMUs▸ lying around (for Lymington), then why can't they run to Paignton?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #19 on: August 02, 2009, 15:18:03 » |
|
1135 Paddington - Newquay certainly wasn't fully reserved. Only 150 people offloaded when 43132 broke at Par and was subsequently dumped in the down sidings.
How did they get the passengers to Newquay? Next service to St.Austell then by bus........ 1206 Padd - Penzance, which was already well loaded before another 150 piled on with suitcases and other rubbish! Bet they got to Newquay early
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
willc
|
|
« Reply #20 on: August 02, 2009, 17:06:17 » |
|
If SWT▸ have spare DMUs▸ lying around (for Lymington), then why can't they run to Paignton?
You are getting a bit ahead of the December timetable change, when SWT is step up the frequency on the Salisbury-Exeter line. Hence the end of them running west of Exeter. At the moment there is a bit of spare capacity, hence one set is on loan to FGW▸ and another to EMT» while it overhauls its 158 fleet. And while using a dmu on an electric branch may seem a bit silly, the 3-CIGs are old, non-standard and expensive to maintain, while using a 4-car 450 on a five-and-a-bit mile shuttle would be even sillier. And they don't seem inclined to lease a couple of 508s, presumably on cost grounds. How about a Parry People Mover?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #21 on: August 02, 2009, 17:14:53 » |
|
I understand about the proposed SWT▸ timetable change, but this use of the 158s is annoying.
Look - the line is electrified, so using DMUs▸ is appalling IMO▸ . Using 158s is a waste on such a line.
SWT have 2 slammers - why not use one for spare parts? Or, even better, use a shortened 450 or 4?? (the red ones that look lile 150s).
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
willc
|
|
« Reply #22 on: August 02, 2009, 17:43:09 » |
|
I understand about the proposed SWT▸ timetable change, but this use of the 158s is annoying.
Look - the line is electrified, so using DMUs▸ is appalling IMO▸ . Using 158s is a waste on such a line.
SWT have 2 slammers - why not use one for spare parts? Or, even better, use a shortened 450 or 4?? (the red ones that look lile 150s).
These things are old and break down - that's why there were two sets in the first place, both of which now apparently need repairs. Is it actually worth it? Someone at SWT has to make that judgment. It might annoy you, but they are running a business. And Virgin are running DMUs a hell of a lot further day in, day out, on fully electrified routes. And you can't just go around taking a couple of coaches out of trains that weren't designed to work like that. A 455 beyond Woking would probably be as much of an oddity as a 3-CIG and they are fully occupied on London services.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #23 on: August 02, 2009, 17:46:40 » |
|
Hmmm, I was under the impression that the slammers were more reliable than the Desiros!
Re Virgin: they don't the option but to run DEMUs▸ .
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
willc
|
|
« Reply #24 on: August 03, 2009, 21:11:48 » |
|
Hmmm, I was under the impression that the slammers were more reliable than the Desiros!
Re Virgin: they don't the option but to run DEMUs▸ .
Well the saintly Beardie could always 'invest' in some more electrics, but since he can't get someone else to pay, like he usually does, tough. And if they weren't running every 20 minutes to Brum and Manchester, you could free some up that way. Mk1 EMUs▸ were very reliable when there were hundreds of the things running around which got lots of tlc. When you are trying to keep just two going, that's a rather different matter.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vacman
|
|
« Reply #25 on: August 05, 2009, 21:50:24 » |
|
If SWT▸ have spare DMUs▸ lying around (for Lymington), then why can't they run to Paignton?
You are getting a bit ahead of the December timetable change, when SWT is step up the frequency on the Salisbury-Exeter line. Hence the end of them running west of Exeter. At the moment there is a bit of spare capacity, hence one set is on loan to FGW▸ and another to EMT» while it overhauls its 158 fleet. And while using a dmu on an electric branch may seem a bit silly, the 3-CIGs are old, non-standard and expensive to maintain, while using a 4-car 450 on a five-and-a-bit mile shuttle would be even sillier. And they don't seem inclined to lease a couple of 508s, presumably on cost grounds. How about a Parry People Mover? Sorry but in this day and age it is totally unacceptable to have an electrified branch with NO electric trains! Am no expert on EMU▸ 's but aren't London Overground replacing some 3 car EMU's in North London? surely they'd do?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
willc
|
|
« Reply #26 on: August 06, 2009, 18:26:51 » |
|
Well you'd better write to Brian Souter of Stagecoach to tell him - and since he owns 50% of Virgin Trains you could tell how unacceptable it is for him to run all those Voyagers from Birmingham to Scotland on a main line as well. Any extra stock equals extra cost - and SWT▸ is feeling the heat like anyone else.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vacman
|
|
« Reply #27 on: August 10, 2009, 23:01:21 » |
|
Well you'd better write to Brian Souter of Stagecoach to tell him - and since he owns 50% of Virgin Trains you could tell how unacceptable it is for him to run all those Voyagers from Birmingham to Scotland on a main line as well. Any extra stock equals extra cost - and SWT▸ is feeling the heat like anyone else.
Maybe so, but other trains run on that route that are electric, with Lymington ALL of the trains will be diesel from what I can gather which makes my point stand!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #28 on: August 10, 2009, 23:32:17 » |
|
Sorry Willc, but I'm with Vacman on this.
The reason VT▸ run DEMUs▸ under the wires is because of the badly organised split of the VXC▸ routes - if Branson had his way, he'd still be giving the WCML▸ direct trains to the South and South West!
There is no suitable stock (125 mph tilting) available for the route, so Voyagers have to do. VT need 3 tph on the B'ham and M'chester routes as the fast journey times have/will attract extra passengers (who like FAST▸ trains).
For SWT▸ to run the Lymington branch with 158s when there is a national shortage of DMUs▸ when there are plenty of EMUs▸ around. Surely they can get something!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
willc
|
|
« Reply #29 on: August 11, 2009, 00:18:18 » |
|
No point telling me what you think - I know - like I said, tell Mr Souter. And if you think one class 158 is going to solve the shortage of dmus, god help us.
I wasn't joking about a Parry people mover and there are all manner of potentially suitable European light rail vehicles which wouldn't even need third rail power either - this is a five-mile, lightly-used rural branch, which would never have survived without the Isle of Wight ferry link and could easily be operated independently from the main network.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|