Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:15 09 Jan 2025
 
- Fresh weather warnings for ice across UK
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
9th Jan (2004)
Incorporation of Railway Development Society Ltd (now Railfuture) (link)

Train RunningShort Run
18:38 Barnstaple to Exmouth
18:56 Exmouth to Paignton
19:15 Paignton to Exmouth
19:17 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
19:25 Exmouth to Paignton
19:31 Okehampton to Exeter Central
19:56 Exmouth to Paignton
20:19 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
Delayed
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
17:52 Trowbridge to Great Malvern
18:18 London Paddington to Swansea
18:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
18:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
18:34 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 09, 2025, 20:17:59 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[149] Railcard Prices going up
[126] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[97] Thumpers for Dummies
[53] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[36] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[34] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
Author Topic: Fully booked to Cornwall  (Read 17848 times)
Super Guard
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1308


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: August 02, 2009, 10:43:02 »

Seems Dft have not however with the ending of SouthWest Trains through working to Paignton soon.
Bad decision that IMHO (in my humble opinion)

Naturally, I agree. Its always nice to return from Exeter on a respectable train!

And are you saying Exeters premier bus fleet isn't respectable?  Shocked Wink Grin
Logged

Any opinions made on this forum are purely personal and my own.  I am in no way speaking for, or offering the views of First Great Western or First Group.

If my employer feels I have broken any aspect of the Social Media Policy, please PM me immediately, so I can rectify without delay.
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #16 on: August 02, 2009, 11:30:00 »

1135 Paddington - Newquay certainly wasn't fully reserved. Only 150 people offloaded when 43132 broke at Par and was subsequently dumped in the down sidings.

How did they get the passengers to Newquay?
Logged
slippy
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 135


View Profile Email
« Reply #17 on: August 02, 2009, 12:36:09 »

1135 Paddington - Newquay certainly wasn't fully reserved. Only 150 people offloaded when 43132 broke at Par and was subsequently dumped in the down sidings.

How did they get the passengers to Newquay?

Next service to St.Austell then by bus........
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: August 02, 2009, 13:47:04 »

If SWT (South West Trains) have spare DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) lying around (for Lymington), then why can't they run to Paignton?
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: August 02, 2009, 15:18:03 »

1135 Paddington - Newquay certainly wasn't fully reserved. Only 150 people offloaded when 43132 broke at Par and was subsequently dumped in the down sidings.

How did they get the passengers to Newquay?

Next service to St.Austell then by bus........

1206 Padd - Penzance, which was already well loaded before another 150 piled on with suitcases and other rubbish!

Bet they got to Newquay early  Cheesy
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: August 02, 2009, 17:06:17 »

If SWT (South West Trains) have spare DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) lying around (for Lymington), then why can't they run to Paignton?

You are getting a bit ahead of the December timetable change, when SWT is step up the frequency on the Salisbury-Exeter line. Hence the end of them running west of Exeter.

At the moment there is a bit of spare capacity, hence one set is on loan to FGW (First Great Western) and another to EMT» (East Midlands Trains - about) while it overhauls its 158 fleet.

And while using a dmu on an electric branch may seem a bit silly, the 3-CIGs are old, non-standard and expensive to maintain, while using a 4-car 450 on a five-and-a-bit mile shuttle would be even sillier. And they don't seem inclined to lease a couple of 508s, presumably on cost grounds.  How about a Parry People Mover?
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: August 02, 2009, 17:14:53 »

I understand about the proposed SWT (South West Trains) timetable change, but this use of the 158s is annoying.

Look - the line is electrified, so using DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) is appalling IMO (in my opinion). Using 158s is a waste on such a line.

SWT have 2 slammers - why not use one for spare parts? Or, even better, use a shortened 450 or 4?? (the red ones that look lile 150s).
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: August 02, 2009, 17:43:09 »

I understand about the proposed SWT (South West Trains) timetable change, but this use of the 158s is annoying.

Look - the line is electrified, so using DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) is appalling IMO (in my opinion). Using 158s is a waste on such a line.

SWT have 2 slammers - why not use one for spare parts? Or, even better, use a shortened 450 or 4?? (the red ones that look lile 150s).

These things are old and break down - that's why there were two sets in the first place, both of which now apparently need repairs. Is it actually worth it? Someone at SWT has to make that judgment. It might annoy you, but they are running a business. And Virgin are running DMUs a hell of a lot further day in, day out, on fully electrified routes.

And you can't just go around taking a couple of coaches out of trains that weren't designed to work like that. A 455 beyond Woking would probably be as much of an oddity as a 3-CIG and they are fully occupied on London services.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: August 02, 2009, 17:46:40 »

Hmmm, I was under the impression that the slammers were more reliable than the Desiros!

Re Virgin: they don't the option but to run DEMUs (Diesel Electric Multiple Unit).
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: August 03, 2009, 21:11:48 »

Hmmm, I was under the impression that the slammers were more reliable than the Desiros!

Re Virgin: they don't the option but to run DEMUs (Diesel Electric Multiple Unit).

Well the saintly Beardie could always 'invest' in some more electrics, but since he can't get someone else to pay, like he usually does, tough. And if they weren't running every 20 minutes to Brum and Manchester, you could free some up that way.

Mk1 EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit) were very reliable when there were hundreds of the things running around which got lots of tlc. When you are trying to keep just two going, that's a rather different matter.
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: August 05, 2009, 21:50:24 »

If SWT (South West Trains) have spare DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) lying around (for Lymington), then why can't they run to Paignton?

You are getting a bit ahead of the December timetable change, when SWT is step up the frequency on the Salisbury-Exeter line. Hence the end of them running west of Exeter.

At the moment there is a bit of spare capacity, hence one set is on loan to FGW (First Great Western) and another to EMT» (East Midlands Trains - about) while it overhauls its 158 fleet.

And while using a dmu on an electric branch may seem a bit silly, the 3-CIGs are old, non-standard and expensive to maintain, while using a 4-car 450 on a five-and-a-bit mile shuttle would be even sillier. And they don't seem inclined to lease a couple of 508s, presumably on cost grounds.  How about a Parry People Mover?
Sorry but in this day and age it is totally unacceptable to have an electrified branch with NO electric trains! Am no expert on EMU (Electric Multiple Unit)'s but aren't London Overground replacing some 3 car EMU's in North London? surely they'd do?Huh
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: August 06, 2009, 18:26:51 »

Well you'd better write to Brian Souter of Stagecoach to tell him - and since he owns 50% of Virgin Trains you could tell how unacceptable it is for him to run all those Voyagers from Birmingham to Scotland on a main line as well. Any extra stock equals extra cost - and SWT (South West Trains) is feeling the heat like anyone else.
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: August 10, 2009, 23:01:21 »

Well you'd better write to Brian Souter of Stagecoach to tell him - and since he owns 50% of Virgin Trains you could tell how unacceptable it is for him to run all those Voyagers from Birmingham to Scotland on a main line as well. Any extra stock equals extra cost - and SWT (South West Trains) is feeling the heat like anyone else.
Maybe so, but other trains run on that route that are electric, with Lymington ALL of the trains will be diesel from what I can gather which makes my point stand!
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #28 on: August 10, 2009, 23:32:17 »

Sorry Willc, but I'm with Vacman on this.

The reason VT (Virgin Trains - former franchises) run DEMUs (Diesel Electric Multiple Unit) under the wires is because of the badly organised split of the VXC (Virgin Cross Country - former franchise) routes - if Branson had his way, he'd still be giving the WCML (West Coast Main Line) direct trains to the South and South West!

There is no suitable stock (125 mph tilting) available for the route, so Voyagers have to do. VT need 3 tph on the B'ham and M'chester routes as the fast journey times have/will attract extra passengers (who like FAST (Federation Against Software Theft) trains).

For SWT (South West Trains) to run the Lymington branch with 158s when there is a national shortage of DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) when there are plenty of EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit) around. Surely they can get something!
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: August 11, 2009, 00:18:18 »

No point telling me what you think - I know - like I said, tell Mr Souter. And if you think one class 158 is going to solve the shortage of dmus, god help us.

I wasn't joking about a Parry people mover and there are all manner of potentially suitable European light rail vehicles which wouldn't even need third rail power either - this is a five-mile, lightly-used rural branch, which would never have survived without the Isle of Wight ferry link and could easily be operated independently from the main network.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page