Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:35 10 Jan 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025
28/01/25 - Coffee Shop 18th Birthday

On this day
10th Jan (1863)
Metropolitain line opened from Paddington (link)

Train RunningCancelled
12:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
13:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
13:23 London Paddington to Oxford
13:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
13:30 Greenford to West Ealing
13:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
13:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
13:45 West Ealing to Greenford
13:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
14:00 Greenford to West Ealing
14:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
14:15 West Ealing to Greenford
14:23 London Paddington to Oxford
14:30 Greenford to West Ealing
14:45 West Ealing to Greenford
15:00 Greenford to West Ealing
15:15 West Ealing to Greenford
15:30 Greenford to West Ealing
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Short Run
12:37 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
14:20 Carmarthen to London Paddington
Delayed
13:05 London Paddington to Newbury
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
14:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:06 London Paddington to Newbury
14:12 Newbury to Reading
14:25 Newbury to London Paddington
14:37 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
15:03 Oxford to London Paddington
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
15:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 13:52:40 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[132] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[78] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[62] Westminster Hall debate : Railway services to South West
[56] Birthday trip, Melksham to Penzance - 28th January 2025
[30] A Beginner's Guide to the Great Western "Coffee Shop" Passenge...
[29] Thumpers for Dummies
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
  Print  
Author Topic: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)  (Read 29654 times)
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: March 18, 2010, 19:06:59 »

So is that curtains for the line alongside New Cut to the Create Centre then?
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: March 18, 2010, 19:11:35 »

The notes to teh announcement explain:

Today^s announcement grants the Ashton Vale to Temple Meads and Bristol City Centre Bus Rapid Transit major scheme ^Programme Entry^ status in line with the Department for Transport^s local major scheme guidance approval process, meaning the Department expects to fund the scheme subject to availability of funds, costs remaining the same, and the relevant planning permission being obtained.

So no money has changed hands. These and other recent DfT» (Department for Transport - about) announcements are very much initial approvals - wonder why they are so common all of a sudden... Roll Eyes

Paul
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: March 18, 2010, 19:15:23 »

Can't possibly imagine.  Wink
Logged
Adrian the Rock
Full Member
***
Posts: 38



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #18 on: March 18, 2010, 21:50:09 »

What gets me about Bristol is that, if they put their minds to it, they could probably have a jolly decent tram network given the various ex-rail trackbeds and other lightly-used lines in the area.

First, Lawrence Hill (High Level!) to Mangotsfield, or maybe even as far as Yate.  Second, the Severn Beach branch looks to me like the sort of line that should have been chosen in the first place for those tram-train experiments they originally had the mad idea of trying on Sheffield - Huddersfield.  It seems to me the Severn Beach line has always struggled as a heavy rail line - a service at most half hourly is not going to be very attractive within a conurbation - but if the passenger services were converted to trams (with the route remaining its capability for freight and other diversions) - a more frequent service could be provided, perhaps with additional stations, and that'd probably make a huge difference.

In the other direction, do the same with the Portishead line and include Parson St and Bedminster in the tram services.  Same calculus applies - the line is probably too short to be a really viable heavy rail passenger route, but trams would probably be a huge hit like NET is in Nottingham.

Okay, I don't have a grand plan for the central section, but I'd have thought something could be worked out - if not on-street running then at least sharing NR» (Network Rail - home page) tracks between Lawrence Hill and Parson St.

Otheer possibilities would include running up to Filton Abbey Wood and Parkway (with the main lines between Dr Days Bridge Jvt and Filtoon reinstated and used as the NR lines, or even re-opening Severn Beach to Patchway and possibly beyond.
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: March 18, 2010, 22:15:54 »

Go back 30 years and there was indeed such a plan. "Avon Metro" appeared in a 1980 Modern Railways and was heavily promoted by Richard Cotterell. Sadly nothing ever happened, for reasons that will be known to many, and are far too long to go into here.
Logged
Cruithne3753
Full Member
***
Posts: 51



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: March 18, 2010, 22:48:49 »

If Brunel was alive today, I wonder what he would do?
Logged

Matt
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19094


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #21 on: March 18, 2010, 23:01:10 »

He would probably be shaking his head over such a lost opportunity.  Roll Eyes

See http://www.tramdev.clara.net/hist.htm for some background on the Avon Metro.  Sad
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6554


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: March 19, 2010, 06:02:29 »

If Brunel was alive today, I wonder what he would do?
Not spend the money on yet more buses! They just don't get it do they, people won't get out of their cars to get on a bus but many would to get on a tram. Just looking at the success of tram networks around the country. Shame it will probably never happen in this part of the world.
Logged
Brucey
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2259


View Profile WWW
« Reply #23 on: March 19, 2010, 07:54:28 »

Not spend the money on yet more buses! They just don't get it do they, people won't get out of their cars to get on a bus but many would to get on a tram. Just looking at the success of tram networks around the country. Shame it will probably never happen in this part of the world.
Having spent my life living in Portsmouth before moving to Bristol, we've had out fair share of elaborate tram system proposals.  All that happens is they end up building more bus lanes and buying new buses, which are just as underused as the previous ones.  Roll Eyes

Bristol certainly needs a public transport link (not buses) to the city centre.  The lack of this connection could be one of the factors which causes the congestion around this area.  An underground system would probably be needed, otherwise the trams would cause even more chaos on the roads.
Logged
TheLastMinute
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 188


This really isn't worth reading.


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: March 19, 2010, 12:30:21 »

Oh, if only we still lived in Avon...
Logged
dog box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 653


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: March 19, 2010, 18:26:03 »

Severn Beach Line struggling?Huh?.....well if you think full and standing at peak times equals struggling
Logged

All postings reflect my own personal views and opinions and are not intended to be, nor should be taken as official statements of first great western or first group policy
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19094


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #26 on: October 08, 2010, 20:54:30 »

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page):

Quote
Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses

A planned ^42m bendy bus scheme for Bristol could be replaced by a cheaper tram scheme.

The bus plan was originally announced in 2009 and would have linked Long Ashton park-and-ride with Temple Meads.

Bristol City Council has met with tram consultants Sustraco who claim switching to trams could save the authority money.

The council will now meet with a government minister to discuss whether either scheme is viable.

Councillor Gary Hopkins, the council's transport spokesman, said the authority was aware that funding was a big issue. "We are aware the government are reviewing the costings on these schemes and the different viabilities," he said. "As some of the money will come from government then we have to be sensitive to their views. If government decides we'd much rather support a different type of technology then what we're saying to them is we're happy with what we've bid for but if you feel there's a different way forward we'll listen."

Bristol had planned a city-wide ^200m tram scheme nine years ago but it was scrapped in 2004 because of escalating costs.
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
standclearplease
Full Member
***
Posts: 86


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: October 09, 2010, 12:06:11 »

I'll believe it when I see it!  Wink

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-11499496

« Last Edit: October 09, 2010, 12:27:41 by standclearplease » Logged
anthony215
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1299


View Profile Email
« Reply #28 on: October 09, 2010, 14:21:04 »

If Trams are cheaper than the FTR (Fitness To Run) bendy bus then maybe someone at Swansea council should look at a tramlink betwen Swansea & Mumbles.

Wasnt the problems with the Bristol tram scheme that the  local aunthorities couldnt agree on the proposals or somthing?
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19094


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #29 on: October 09, 2010, 18:52:33 »

I've merged a few topics here - as usual, in the interests of continuity and clarity ...  Roll Eyes Embarrassed Grin
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page