Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #315 on: November 16, 2010, 18:23:04 » |
|
The BBC» are now suggesting an announcement will be made 'before the end of November' - see http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11758780 The Transport Secretary Philip Hammond told the BBC that he would soon set out government plans to address the overcrowding issue. He insisted that reform will ensure Britain's railways do more, for less.
"We need to look at the whole structure of the industry, how the franchises are let, we need to look at train operators' work, we need to look at how Network Rail does its work and delivers efficiency in its programme," he said.
"We need to look at the role of my department. At the moment I have got civil servants here specifying which trains and which carriages have to be used at which times on which franchise. That does not seem to be the most obviously sensible way to run a railway.
He acknowledged that making the railway "fit for the future and affordable for passengers and taxpayers" was the "number one challenge" facing his department.
He is expected to announce detailed proposals before the end of November.
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
Electric train
|
|
« Reply #316 on: November 16, 2010, 20:18:12 » |
|
The BBC» are now suggesting an announcement will be made 'before the end of November' - see http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11758780 The Transport Secretary Philip Hammond told the BBC that he would soon set out government plans to address the overcrowding issue. He insisted that reform will ensure Britain's railways do more, for less. "We need to look at the whole structure of the industry, how the franchises are let, we need to look at train operators' work, we need to look at how Network Rail does its work and delivers efficiency in its programme," he said. "We need to look at the role of my department. At the moment I have got civil servants here specifying which trains and which carriages have to be used at which times on which franchise. That does not seem to be the most obviously sensible way to run a railway. He acknowledged that making the railway "fit for the future and affordable for passengers and taxpayers" was the "number one challenge" facing his department. He is expected to announce detailed proposals before the end of November. Does not say which November though
|
|
|
Logged
|
Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
|
|
|
|
|
Chafford1
|
|
« Reply #319 on: November 21, 2010, 12:13:06 » |
|
Today's Sunday Times says Thursday for the announcement.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Zoe
|
|
« Reply #321 on: November 21, 2010, 18:15:56 » |
|
Sice when have 125s been mass commuter movers?
HSTs▸ are used on Paddington to Oxford commuter trains.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
inspector_blakey
|
|
« Reply #322 on: November 21, 2010, 18:29:19 » |
|
Sice when have 125s been mass commuter movers?
Erm, that would be more or less ever since their inception, when the high-speed, frequent service made longer distance commuting to London from places like Swindon, Chippenham, Bristol, Peterborough, Newark etc etc a viable proposition!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #323 on: November 21, 2010, 18:51:12 » |
|
So , the Express is actually right!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
caliwag
|
|
« Reply #324 on: November 21, 2010, 21:55:56 » |
|
Peterborough/Newark a mere handful compared with real commuting. I use to commute from York to KX and I do not recall them piling on...that's not real commuting.
Oxford and Bristol OK, but does all that justify 8 billion investment?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
inspector_blakey
|
|
« Reply #325 on: November 21, 2010, 22:39:52 » |
|
I have no idea what you mean, but I suspect you're barking up the wrong tree here. I'm guessing the Express's article is about the Intercity express programme, to replace the HST▸ fleet en masse.
Whether or not you would consider that HSTs are used by commuters is utterly immaterial. They're excellent trains but increasingly long in the tooth, heavily utilized, won't be able to last for ever and are due for replacement. Believe it or not, HSTs are not just used by commuters from Bristol and Oxford.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
caliwag
|
|
« Reply #326 on: November 21, 2010, 23:05:22 » |
|
I'm not barking up any tree...I am merely pointing out that the dreadful Sunday Express is wasting space and getting people excited about the bleeding obvious...plainly the 125s, considered long in the tooth or not, will be replaced at some point. Generally they are long distance trains...not commuter services as implied by the pathetic article. They will certainly not, as implied as well we know, be scrapped. It is just typical sensationilist rubbish reporting and since nothing will be announced until Tuesday at the earliest, complete speculation
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #327 on: November 21, 2010, 23:21:18 » |
|
The current HSTs▸ (that is, 125s) will be with us for at least another ten years. (Source: Very Senior Management, FGW▸ .) CfN.
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
SDS
|
|
« Reply #328 on: November 22, 2010, 00:14:00 » |
|
10 years at least, and then they will try and squeeze some more years after that.
After all haven't the engines all been replaced recently anyway?
|
|
|
Logged
|
I do not work for FGW▸ and posts should not be assumed and do not imply they are statements, unless explicitly stated that they are, from any TOC▸ including First Great Western.
|
|
|
willc
|
|
« Reply #329 on: November 22, 2010, 09:49:28 » |
|
House of Commons Business for Thursday (Westminster Hall, not the main chamber)
2.30pm - 5pm Impact of the Comprehensive Spending Review on the Department for Transport
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|