800101 that was reported on a trip to North Pole Depot is allocated to Virgin East Coast - Branson unveiled it this morning.....
I read about this on the
BBC» Web site today and was surprised about the quoted time savings on the Edinburgh to Kings Cross journey. I am surprised this is possible because doesn't it depends on what traffic there is on the line?
Yes, the time saving is more than 5 x 40 seconds, isn't it?
In the current timetable**, faster trains only do four stops, and take varying times of around 4:20. Before the current fashion for regular hourly (or half hourly) services, the Flying Scotsman did it with three stops in 4:13 (in 2000).
The
IEP▸ spec called for a journey time* of 3:49 or less with five stops, zero dwell time, and no signalling delays. That also assumed the line itself was as described at the time (2011, or perhaps earlier) in terms of speed limits and other improvements. Adding in 5 x 2 minutes dwell doesn't leave a lot to spare, does it?
Can a path, or a set of hourly paths, that would realise such a timing be fitted into the timetable? I'm sure it's possible. You would expect there to be conflicts with other services (i.e. other
TOCs▸ ' services, in the present set-up), and I suspect
NR» 's timetablers are not allowed to respond directly to customer preferences (e.g. by taking backhanders from Richard Branson). But it may be possible to fit them all in just by being clever.
* This applies to single-unit trains, either electric or bi-mode with an odd number of cars. Multiple-unit trains or bi-mode units with an even number of cars can take a minute more. ** Northbound timings, which make more sense. Southbound there is now a "Flying Scotsman" taking 4:00, but with one stop and at the wrong time of day. In 2000, FS wasn't even the fastest southbound train.