Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:35 06 Jan 2025
 
- Taxi driver who stoked Southport riots jailed
- Works on 'road from hell' to end after 23 years
- 'Second chance at life' after UK's first liver transplant for advanced bowel cancer
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 08/01/25 - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
09/01/25 - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
6th Jan (1968)
Hixon Railway accident (link)

Train RunningCancelled
20:05 Liskeard to Looe
20:37 Looe to Liskeard
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
20:51 Bristol Temple Meads to Bristol Parkway
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
19:36 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
19:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
21:21 Bristol Parkway to Trowbridge
Delayed
18:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
19:18 Trowbridge to Cardiff Central
20:22 Reading to Shalford
20:38 Maidenhead to Marlow
21:30 Shalford to Reading
07/01/25 04:50 Fratton to Salisbury
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 06, 2025, 20:46:44 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[97] New Adlestrop Railway Atlas update
[56] Mining in Cornwall
[43] DFT - Where is the South Devon Railway
[41] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[39] Bridport branch reopening proposal
[39] Bath to Bridgnorth and back 4/1/25
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 100 101 [102] 103 104 ... 176
  Print  
Author Topic: Great Western Main Line electrification - ongoing discussion  (Read 1135871 times)
patch38
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 654


View Profile
« Reply #1515 on: January 05, 2016, 16:58:09 »

Quote
I seem to remember there are some mobile phone masts in West Berkshire that have been painted to make them less intrusive (and they are on the edge of a forest from memory)

Do you mean the ones disguised as pine trees by the M4 at Yattendon? Quite well done...
Logged
BerkshireBugsy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1640


Berkshire Bugsy Jr


View Profile
« Reply #1516 on: January 05, 2016, 17:01:09 »

Quote
I seem to remember there are some mobile phone masts in West Berkshire that have been painted to make them less intrusive (and they are on the edge of a forest from memory)

Do you mean the ones disguised as pine trees by the M4 at Yattendon? Quite well done...

Those are the ones...when they were first planted there were reports of drivers on the M4 having near misses because they were distracted trying to spot them!

Logged
chrisr_75
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1019


View Profile
« Reply #1517 on: January 05, 2016, 17:28:46 »

Quote
They are shining bright silver. They are galvanised steel

They will however weather quite rapidly to a fairly unobtrusive flat, dull grey colour.

Painting surely is a bad option as it will need to be maintained and is likely to contribute to future corrosion problems if the paint isn't 100% bonded to its substrate.

I guess certain parts of the home counties were always going to produce issues like this!
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43052



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1518 on: January 05, 2016, 17:33:40 »

I'm not sure if anyone on here's old enough to remember it  Grin but I understand that in Mr Brunel's day when the railway was being built, there were some pretty strong objections to certain proposals / structures ... and indeed some changes.   Yet these days, so much that would have been regarded as a major industrial-style change to the landscape has metamorphosed into a celebrated eloquence, and some of the things done to beautify are classified as "follies".

Today's engineering works may become tomorrow's celebrated beauty, and today's masts hidden as trees may become tomorrow's follies.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8449



View Profile
« Reply #1519 on: January 05, 2016, 18:37:50 »

I'm not sure if anyone on here's old enough to remember it  Grin but I understand that in Mr Brunel's day when the railway was being built, there were some pretty strong objections to certain proposals / structures ... and indeed some changes.   Yet these days, so much that would have been regarded as a major industrial-style change to the landscape has metamorphosed into a celebrated eloquence, and some of the things done to beautify are classified as "follies".

Today's engineering works may become tomorrow's celebrated beauty, and today's masts hidden as trees may become tomorrow's follies.

I hardly think you can compare a few steel gantries to Box Tunnel or the line along the coast in Dawlish, and if we're around long enough to hear the former described as a "celebrated beauty" I will happily buy you beer all evening before eating my hat!!!  Grin
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10361


View Profile
« Reply #1520 on: January 05, 2016, 19:05:29 »

...before eating my hat!!!  Grin

A stovepipe one presumably?   Wink
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
dviner
Full Member
***
Posts: 82


View Profile
« Reply #1521 on: January 05, 2016, 20:42:01 »

Of course, to maintain an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, we really need to get rid of all of the man-made monstrosities that detract from the natural landscape - the roads and houses.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4504


View Profile
« Reply #1522 on: January 05, 2016, 21:33:51 »

Of course, to maintain an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, we really need to get rid of all of the man-made monstrosities that detract from the natural landscape - the roads and houses.

No only the modern ones (say post 1800) and you could just restore the roads to cart tracks. Surely that would be the landscape that was to be preserved. 
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #1523 on: January 05, 2016, 21:50:11 »

At the risk of being slightly provocative, it had never even occurred to me in many years of travelling to and from London that I was indeed passing through an AONB (Areas Of Natural Beauty). Indeed, I've not even given it a second glance.  Whereas Dawlish, lots of the Cornish main line, the Lune Gorge, etc, etc....

Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6594


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #1524 on: January 05, 2016, 22:17:45 »

Those gantries are a lot less intrusive than the 9 110m tall wind turbines being built a few miles from my (rural) abode. In a part of Devon where you would struggle to get permission to build a kennel for the Jack Russell, 18 huge pools of concrete are being laid into the slow draining culm that soaks up the rain and releases it slowly, or at least used to. The good people living by the new gantries will at least be able to take consolation in the knowledge that they will do some good, and not just line a few pockets with subsidies (though doubtless some of that will still happen).
Logged

Now, please!
dviner
Full Member
***
Posts: 82


View Profile
« Reply #1525 on: January 05, 2016, 22:29:28 »

Of course, to maintain an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, we really need to get rid of all of the man-made monstrosities that detract from the natural landscape - the roads and houses.

No only the modern ones (say post 1800) and you could just restore the roads to cart tracks. Surely that would be the landscape that was to be preserved. 

Nope, unless you can prove that the thatch on the cottage was placed there by the wind, and the walls were the result of sedimentary rock formation, you're out of luck.

Cart tracks - you must be kidding.

 Grin
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5632



View Profile
« Reply #1526 on: January 05, 2016, 23:03:02 »

Of course, to maintain an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, we really need to get rid of all of the man-made monstrosities that detract from the natural landscape - the roads and houses.

Yes but what about the fields ? if one looks back far enough, most of England was covered in dense forest, until the discovery of agriculture !
The heritage industry never seem very clear as to what era they are seeking to restore/return to/preserve.
Prehistoric, complete with dinosaurs
stone age
iron age
Ancient Roman
Medieval
Early industrial revolution
Victorian
Pre ww1
Between the wars
Just post ww2
1960s
1970s
1980s
1990s
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8449



View Profile
« Reply #1527 on: January 06, 2016, 05:47:15 »

I don't think anyone (with the possible exception of Jeremy Corbyn/the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers)/ASLEF» (Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen - about)) is seriously suggesting a return to a medieval idyll/or a time when dinosaurs walked the Earth, just that perhaps a little more thought could have been given to the surrounding environment when these gantries were designed/chosen?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43052



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1528 on: January 06, 2016, 08:11:47 »

I don't think anyone (with the possible exception of Jeremy Corbyn/the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers)/ASLEF» (Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen - about)) is seriously suggesting a return to a medieval idyll/or a time when dinosaurs walked the Earth, just that perhaps a little more thought could have been given to the surrounding environment when these gantries were designed/chosen?

I think I read somewhere that the gantries they're using are of a design that's rather like a Meccano  set - lots of standard parts that bolt together differently to suit the location / needs of each gantry.  And I recall that was said to make the electrification works a lot easier, cheaper and faster rather than having to do a 'special' at each location.  It struck me, though, that this could mean a certain amount of excess / needless metalwork providing attachment points for things not attached, and perhaps rather chunkier / heavier elements than were always needed as it would have to be manufactured to match worst case use scenario.   

Did I get this right, or was I having a "funny" dream??
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8449



View Profile
« Reply #1529 on: January 06, 2016, 08:23:16 »

I don't think anyone (with the possible exception of Jeremy Corbyn/the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers)/ASLEF» (Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen - about)) is seriously suggesting a return to a medieval idyll/or a time when dinosaurs walked the Earth, just that perhaps a little more thought could have been given to the surrounding environment when these gantries were designed/chosen?

I think I read somewhere that the gantries they're using are of a design that's rather like a Meccano  set - lots of standard parts that bolt together differently to suit the location / needs of each gantry.  And I recall that was said to make the electrification works a lot easier, cheaper and faster rather than having to do a 'special' at each location.  It struck me, though, that this could mean a certain amount of excess / needless metalwork providing attachment points for things not attached, and perhaps rather chunkier / heavier elements than were always needed as it would have to be manufactured to match worst case use scenario.   

Did I get this right, or was I having a "funny" dream??

..........far be it from anyone else to pass judgement on whether a dream about railway gantries constitutes "funny"...........I guess it depends on what you normally dream about?   Grin
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 100 101 [102] 103 104 ... 176
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page