Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:55 06 Jan 2025
 
- Taxi driver who stoked Southport riots jailed
- Works on 'road from hell' to end after 23 years
- 'Second chance at life' after UK's first liver transplant for advanced bowel cancer
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 08/01/25 - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
09/01/25 - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
6th Jan (1968)
Hixon Railway accident (link)

Train RunningCancelled
20:37 Looe to Liskeard
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
20:51 Bristol Temple Meads to Bristol Parkway
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
19:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
21:21 Bristol Parkway to Trowbridge
Delayed
20:22 Reading to Shalford
20:38 Maidenhead to Marlow
21:30 Shalford to Reading
07/01/25 04:50 Fratton to Salisbury
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 06, 2025, 21:03:33 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[97] New Adlestrop Railway Atlas update
[56] Mining in Cornwall
[43] DFT - Where is the South Devon Railway
[41] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[39] Bridport branch reopening proposal
[39] Bath to Bridgnorth and back 4/1/25
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 92 93 [94] 95 96 ... 176
  Print  
Author Topic: Great Western Main Line electrification - ongoing discussion  (Read 1136348 times)
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13019


View Profile Email
« Reply #1395 on: November 12, 2015, 13:22:04 »

My impression from the comments here are that NR» (Network Rail - home page) needs to get out and educate those affected such that they fully understand what is needed & what is design & therefore what can be changed & what can't. It seems that many are commenting without being suitably informed

Your wording seems to say that people should not comment until they're fully - or rather "suitably" - informed Chris, and should not comment until they are.   I suspect that's not really the message you intended to give; if it is, then I would strongly say that this forum welcomes inputs and questions to help inform, and does not require people to be pre-fully-informed.

I referred to "...get out & educate those affected...." - and as I didn't refer to anyone else the following comments were addressed to the same people. i.e. not those here.
Logged
4064ReadingAbbey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 456


View Profile
« Reply #1396 on: November 12, 2015, 13:30:58 »

I do wish people would accept that the design engineers probably know what they are doing and that there is a reason for things being as they are.

If one wants an electric railway with good reliability the metal work will be chunky. It will certainly be chunkier than that used on the ECML (East Coast Main Line) for good reasons.

Get over it.

I think people should be able to express an opinion without being told that others know best and to "Get over it", I wonder if these same people would feel the same way should they uncover plans for a wind turbine to be built or a motorway bypass to be routed near their house?

I was very careful to refer to 'design engineers' - being those people who designed the kit.

There is a world of a difference between 'designing' a pylon or wind turbine and selecting the position to 'install' it.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43052



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1397 on: November 12, 2015, 13:49:39 »

My impression from the comments here are that NR» (Network Rail - home page) needs to get out and educate those affected such that they fully understand what is needed & what is design & therefore what can be changed & what can't. It seems that many are commenting without being suitably informed

Your wording seems to say that people should not comment until they're fully - or rather "suitably" - informed Chris, and should not comment until they are.   I suspect that's not really the message you intended to give; if it is, then I would strongly say that this forum welcomes inputs and questions to help inform, and does not require people to be pre-fully-informed.

I referred to "...get out & educate those affected...." - and as I didn't refer to anyone else the following comments were addressed to the same people. i.e. not those here.

Many thanks for that confirmation, Chris;  there was a second (clearly unintended) way that the text could be (and was) read.   Glad it's cleared up.   And I second the need to inform fully.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #1398 on: November 12, 2015, 14:34:14 »



The uprights are above the crossbar or cantilever to carry the insulators for the autotransformer anti phase 25 kV cables, with adequate safety clearances from the steelwork.   

This is shown on the F&F web page here:   http://www.furrerfrey.ch/en/systems/Series-1.html
Please scroll lower down and select image '1 of 8'


Thanks for the info.  I'll reserve judgement until they are all up and we can see what bits do what.  At the risk of provoking the experts still further was anyone else noticed that the horizontal members are not horizontal?  I am sure that they are within tolerances but it look like NR» (Network Rail - home page) has failed to buy a spirit level 
Logged
lordgoata
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 415



View Profile
« Reply #1399 on: November 12, 2015, 15:17:20 »

Thanks for the info.  I'll reserve judgement until they are all up and we can see what bits do what.  At the risk of provoking the experts still further was anyone else noticed that the horizontal members are not horizontal?  I am sure that they are within tolerances but it look like NR» (Network Rail - home page) has failed to buy a spirit level 

Funnily enough I noticed that on a couple of masts & booms (as I see they are called!) the other day - but I wondered if the track is cambered, ie. the "horizontals" are parallel with the track ?
Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1400 on: November 12, 2015, 17:47:10 »

Thanks for the info.  I'll reserve judgement until they are all up and we can see what bits do what.  At the risk of provoking the experts still further was anyone else noticed that the horizontal members are not horizontal?  I am sure that they are within tolerances but it look like NR» (Network Rail - home page) has failed to buy a spirit level
Funnily enough I noticed that on a couple of masts & booms (as I see they are called!) the other day - but I wondered if the track is cambered, ie. the "horizontals" are parallel with the track ?
On curves, I guess the track is probably canted (I think that's the correct term).

you would not believe how frustratingly difficult it is to get people to input or take an interest in things years into the future at a time that it's needed to help with the planning.  A few activists will get involved and they will ask for "the earth".  Some other groups will put in zero inputs or modest requests and the voices need to be balanced.   Then there are those who say nothing, accept what's being done - just to object a bit late in the day when it's expensive or impractical to take their wishes into account.
Regarding the Cardiff Central refurbishment plans, I'm worrying I've missed any consultation and we're at the "bit late in the day" stage, given the aparrently quite detailed artist's impressions that have been released (maybe I should have cross-quoted that in the Cardiff Central topic instead, feel free to move this part of my post if it'd be more apropriate there). However, I'm then told
Quote
there is a lot more work to do to determine the business case and the affordability, together with securing funding.

Any future public consultation exercise may be some time off, although we would clearly want to listen to people^s views before finalising any plans
and I fear they're leaving the public consultation until they've already made their minds up and won't listen to comments anyway.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4495


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #1401 on: November 12, 2015, 20:49:25 »

Part of the original remit for GWEP (Great Western Electrification Program) was
To reduce system failure which are inherent in the Mk3 as installed on MML» (Midland Main Line. - about) (BedPan) and ECML (East Coast Main Line) etc,
To be TSI compliant and to meet the requirements of BSEN 50122 neither of which was existed during the construction of the ECML OLE (Overhead Line Equipment, more often "OHLE")
And to keep costs down by using standardised OLE structures and components

The installation has an impact, initially it will look ugly but eventually it will just blend into the background and very few people will even notice. 
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4504


View Profile
« Reply #1402 on: November 12, 2015, 22:08:04 »

and I fear they're leaving the public consultation until they've already made their minds up and won't listen to comments anyway.

It is difficult to win here.  Either you consult asking people for their ideas and they have none and accuse you of bringing nothing to the discussion or you come with ideas and they accuse you of having already decided!
Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1403 on: November 13, 2015, 09:30:19 »

and I fear they're leaving the public consultation until they've already made their minds up and won't listen to comments anyway.
It is difficult to win here.  Either you consult asking people for their ideas and they have none and accuse you of bringing nothing to the discussion or you come with ideas and they accuse you of having already decided!
Good point. Maybe, if it is really the case that apparently quite detailed artist's impressions can be produced without determining the business case, establishing affordability and securing funding, then that would be a good time to consult. Surely you cannot secure funding until you have decided on the final design so you can work out how much it costs (although, in the case of GWML (Great Western Main Line) electrification it doesn't sound like they had done that, and just plucked a number out of thin air). As for what the railway could bring to the discussion, a portfolio of widely varying designs (rather than just one glass & steel monstrosity) should help avoid the view that they have already made their mind up. In the case of Cardiff Central, I'd like to see full plans of the existing structures to see where there may or may not be unused space available for the required expansion of the station.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
ray951
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 500


View Profile
« Reply #1404 on: November 13, 2015, 10:31:35 »

Moving on the discussion from the Goring gap, Network Rail (NR» (Network Rail - home page)) have sent out a few twitter messages that the first wires for the GW (Great Western) electrification were installed last night.
NR also said they did 1000m in 35 minutes, but unfortunately don't say where this is or how much was done.

http://twitter.com/networkrailgwrm/status/665110025325682688/photo/1
http://twitter.com/networkrailgwrm/status/665109748438728704/photo/1


 
Logged
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1451


View Profile
« Reply #1405 on: November 13, 2015, 10:42:29 »

A later tweet indicated it was between Tilehurst and Pangbourne.
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #1406 on: November 13, 2015, 13:31:36 »

Don't get too excited now....... Looks like its only the Earth wire. Easier than putting up the actual knitting Roll Eyes Tongue   But, hey ho, at least some positive (well in this case, earthing) progress at last Shocked
« Last Edit: November 13, 2015, 13:43:57 by SandTEngineer » Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #1407 on: November 13, 2015, 14:22:47 »

Don't get too excited now....... Looks like its only the Earth wire. Easier than putting up the actual knitting Roll Eyes Tongue   But, hey ho, at least some positive (well in this case, earthing) progress at last Shocked

It is still progress so good news.  I assumed that the wire would be put up last minute.  Is it not eminently nickable for scrap at least before the OLE (Overhead Line Equipment, more often "OHLE") is electrified?
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6594


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #1408 on: November 13, 2015, 17:23:43 »

Any future public consultation exercise may be some time off, although we would clearly want to listen to people^s views before finalising any plans and I fear they're leaving the public consultation until they've already made their minds up and won't listen to comments anyway.

Bristol fashion, as they say...
« Last Edit: November 17, 2015, 22:20:59 by Four Track, Now! » Logged

Now, please!
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43052



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1409 on: November 17, 2015, 13:27:16 »

From Network Rail:

Quote
The next Bath Drop-in will be held in the Guildhall on Tuesday 1st December (4.30pm ^ 6.30pm).  Please note the earlier finishing time.
 
Come along and find out more about the work we are doing to modernise the Great Western Railway.
 
Information will be available on the TPOD 2 work planned for next Easter.

Edit to add - I have received an email recalling this announcement - goodness knows if that means the meeting's off, retimed, relocated, or has a restricted invite list now.
 
« Last Edit: November 19, 2015, 11:29:21 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 92 93 [94] 95 96 ... 176
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page