Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:55 06 Jan 2025
 
- Taxi driver who stoked Southport riots jailed
- Works on 'road from hell' to end after 23 years
- 'Second chance at life' after UK's first liver transplant for advanced bowel cancer
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 08/01/25 - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
09/01/25 - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
6th Jan (1968)
Hixon Railway accident (link)

Train RunningCancelled
20:37 Looe to Liskeard
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
20:51 Bristol Temple Meads to Bristol Parkway
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
19:36 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
19:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
21:21 Bristol Parkway to Trowbridge
Delayed
19:18 Trowbridge to Cardiff Central
20:22 Reading to Shalford
20:38 Maidenhead to Marlow
21:30 Shalford to Reading
07/01/25 04:50 Fratton to Salisbury
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 06, 2025, 20:55:51 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[97] New Adlestrop Railway Atlas update
[56] Mining in Cornwall
[43] DFT - Where is the South Devon Railway
[41] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[39] Bridport branch reopening proposal
[39] Bath to Bridgnorth and back 4/1/25
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 89 90 [91] 92 93 ... 176
  Print  
Author Topic: Great Western Main Line electrification - ongoing discussion  (Read 1136128 times)
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10361


View Profile
« Reply #1350 on: November 10, 2015, 13:18:13 »

It would be nice if a design award was in the pipeline (as a matter of fact I think the design of the small part stuff is rather pleasing, less so the gantries!), but far more important for me is that the wires don't come down when it gets windy and if a pantograph gets snagged up it only pulls down the wires above one track rather than all four so trains can keep running.  The recent installations to a similar design in the North-West seem to be achieving that aim, so I'm hopeful the GWML (Great Western Main Line) scheme will as well.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5450


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #1351 on: November 10, 2015, 13:23:23 »

I do appreciate that the BT&CC was a tramway system.   Smiley

I don't accept that 25kV is intrinsically ugly: choices are made which result in an ugly appearance. NR» (Network Rail - home page) seems to be the last bastion of brutalism; the civils on the Borders Railway look quite awful in places. Ugly doesn't necessarily mean cheap either; it can be a sign of bad (rushed?) design.







Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 753


View Profile
« Reply #1352 on: November 10, 2015, 14:36:28 »


I don't accept that 25kV is intrinsically ugly: choices are made which result in an ugly appearance. NR» (Network Rail - home page) seems to be the last bastion of brutalism; the civils on the Borders Railway look quite awful in places. Ugly doesn't necessarily mean cheap either; it can be a sign of bad (rushed?) design.

I agree. The railway industry expends a lot of effort into making trains, bridges, stations etc look aesthetically pleasing.  So why doesn^t the same effort go into OHLE design?  OHLE is never going to look pretty, but what is going up between Reading and Didcot looks far worse than it need be - just have a look of some earlier OHLE around the country eg at the detail design of the mast/gantry interface.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #1353 on: November 10, 2015, 14:54:42 »

If it makes the trains go and doesn't come down in a light breeze I care little what it looks like.
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #1354 on: November 10, 2015, 15:28:01 »

Does anybody have any photographs of what has been installed in the disputed area?  I don't normally travel that way so haven't seen recent progress.  Is it anything like this http://www.furrerfrey.ch/en/furrerfrey/news-overview/2015/q1/TTC-SIC-MAB.html in which case if it is then I don't really see what all the fuss is about Tongue Roll Eyes
« Last Edit: November 10, 2015, 15:45:38 by SandTEngineer » Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #1355 on: November 10, 2015, 15:33:33 »

Have nothing on your railway that you do not know to be useful and believe to be beautiful.

But what might be true for the personal seems less so for the public, due to the wide variance in what we believe to be beautiful and even what we consider useful. Despite this, beauty in the public might even be more important than in the private sphere simply because it is public. And function even more so! If a functional object is flawed in its function by attempts to make it beautiful then it cannot truly be said to be either beautiful or functional.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13019


View Profile Email
« Reply #1356 on: November 10, 2015, 15:37:43 »

Does anybody have any photographs of what has been installed in the disputed area? 



Logged
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1451


View Profile
« Reply #1357 on: November 10, 2015, 15:43:35 »

When I saw the second photo on the campaign website I thought it didn't make a good case as it showed a built up area.
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #1358 on: November 10, 2015, 15:52:20 »

Hang on a minute.  Is that a NG (Natural Gas) Powerline I see in the distance of the second photograph?  The OLE (Overhead Line Equipment, more often "OHLE") looks quite good compared with that as its obviously at a much lower level.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13019


View Profile Email
« Reply #1359 on: November 10, 2015, 15:55:09 »

Those lines were likely in place before the AONB (Areas Of Natural Beauty) was established
Logged
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1451


View Profile
« Reply #1360 on: November 10, 2015, 17:21:58 »

There have been power lines in the area at least since the 1940s (probably the 1930s) - albeit they would have been a lower voltage grid then.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8449



View Profile
« Reply #1361 on: November 10, 2015, 18:43:38 »

I'm a believer in form following function but that second photo looks awful, those stanchions are a blot on the landscape  Sad
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5632



View Profile
« Reply #1362 on: November 10, 2015, 19:08:45 »

Has the second picture been digitally enhanced I wonder ?
It almost looks as though the trees behind the OHLE have been rendered darker than would be natural, in order that the relatively light coloured galvanised steelwork is more conspicuous than in real life.

Or perhaps a similar effect was achieved naturally on a day with intermittent sun and cloud, by waiting for the trees to under cloud and thereby darker, but the steelwork to be in brighter light and therefore more noticeable ?

The viewpoint also looks a little odd, perhaps taken from an aircraft, or drone, or from atop a tower, rather than from near ground level.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Visoflex
Full Member
***
Posts: 66


View Profile
« Reply #1363 on: November 10, 2015, 19:34:32 »


...Going back to OHLE, my main point is that there appear to be multiple designs which make sense from cost and engineering, given that a variety of designs have been implemented. It would seem sensible to have involved the locals at an early stage, to try and avoid the suituation we apparently have now with NIMBYs moaning when it really is too late for NR» (Network Rail - home page) to realisticly do anything.

OHLE doesn't have to be fugly - like everything else, it's a choice:


Something like this perhaps
http://www.ribacompetitions.com/ols/shortlisted.html
« Last Edit: November 10, 2015, 23:52:18 by Visoflex » Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43052



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1364 on: November 10, 2015, 20:05:25 »


...Going back to OHLE, my main point is that there appear to be multiple designs which make sense from cost and engineering, given that a variety of designs have been implemented. It would seem sensible to have involved the locals at an early stage, to try and avoid the suituation we apparently have now with NIMBYs moaning when it really is too late for NR» (Network Rail - home page) to realisticly do anything.


I have just come from a Network Rail Stakeholder's briefing in Bath, and (paraphrasing) comments included one that suggested that there were so many different sets of ground conditions, what needs to go on top, and what's around that "nearly every one is different".   A further comment suggested that a great dal of work has been done with interested institutional stakeholders of getting designs right for Bath to smooth the way of final designs through upcoming formal planning applications.  There is a significant issue through Sidney Gardens in terms of protecting both the look and feel of the place, and the safety of the public when electric wires at 25kV are put through and some compromises needed.   
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 89 90 [91] 92 93 ... 176
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page