Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:35 06 Jan 2025
 
- Taxi driver who stoked Southport riots jailed
- Works on 'road from hell' to end after 23 years
- 'Second chance at life' after UK's first liver transplant for advanced bowel cancer
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 08/01/25 - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
09/01/25 - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
6th Jan (1968)
Hixon Railway accident (link)

Train RunningCancelled
20:05 Liskeard to Looe
20:37 Looe to Liskeard
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
19:36 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
19:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
Delayed
18:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
18:34 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
19:18 Trowbridge to Cardiff Central
20:22 Reading to Shalford
20:38 Maidenhead to Marlow
21:30 Shalford to Reading
07/01/25 04:50 Fratton to Salisbury
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 06, 2025, 20:38:07 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[97] New Adlestrop Railway Atlas update
[56] Mining in Cornwall
[43] DFT - Where is the South Devon Railway
[41] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[39] Bridport branch reopening proposal
[39] Bath to Bridgnorth and back 4/1/25
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 81 82 [83] 84 85 ... 176
  Print  
Author Topic: Great Western Main Line electrification - ongoing discussion  (Read 1135615 times)
BerkshireBugsy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1640


Berkshire Bugsy Jr


View Profile
« Reply #1230 on: October 13, 2015, 14:46:42 »

Whilst I admire your optimism, on the 2 bits of line I travel fairly frequently (PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains)-RDG(resolve), and RDG-THA on the B&H (Berks and Hants - railway line from Reading to Taunton via Westbury)) there still seem to be several stretches where there aren't even piles in the ground yet.

For example, around Slough Station, there seems to be very little evidence of electrification work under way at all?

I'm not sure I agree TC(resolve) - there seemed to be quite a few changes around the Twyford/maidenhead section since I last travelled through
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8449



View Profile
« Reply #1231 on: October 13, 2015, 14:49:41 »

They've been busy around Burnham/Taplow alright, banging away all night! (so to speak)

To be fair we all had letters from NR» (Network Rail - home page) explaining what would be happening, when, and apologising for the noise, and also visits from their (very pleasant) representatives.
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6594


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #1232 on: October 13, 2015, 19:30:24 »

On my way out of BRI» (Bristol Temple Meads - next trains) this morning, I noticed the pile of, er, piles by the siding behind Avonmeads had been substantially augmented.
Logged

Now, please!
Thatcham Crossing
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 793


View Profile
« Reply #1233 on: October 13, 2015, 21:13:37 »

Quote
there seemed to be quite a few changes around the Twyford/maidenhead section since I last travelled through

That's my point really BB, it seems quite sporadic - although I do appreciate they can't be working everywhere at once.

What does seem apparent to me though is that they seem to be leaving the complex/hard bits till last, eg, around some stations, bridges, and areas where there are obstructions close to the track. An example of this is just west of Aldermaston where the boundary of a housing estate (fences/trees/walls) is very close to the line. No sign of any piling, although there is plenty on the rest of that stretch towards Midgham.
Logged
Visoflex
Full Member
***
Posts: 66


View Profile
« Reply #1234 on: October 14, 2015, 07:29:11 »

Anyway back to the original topic Smiley In some sections there are just the circular tubes waiting to be cut to size where in other areas there are masts, cross masts and dangly sections (excuse my ignorance on what they are called S&T (Signalling and Telegraph)!)

The "dangly bits" are referred to as "small part steel".  Also, the perceived lack of progress around stations can be partly explained by the fact that the wires will be held up by different types of support.  The most likely type will be a twin track portal arrangement, and that installing this will need fairly major holes to be cut into station canopies and twin track possessions.  Also, there is a gauge clearance exercise to be done too.  The route will be re-gauged to allow W10 and W12 freight wagons to come through, and also to provide adequate clearance for pantographs in accordance with European inter-operability requirements.  This means a measuring and cutting back of the canopies, where the originals are staying, or a rebuild.
Logged
BerkshireBugsy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1640


Berkshire Bugsy Jr


View Profile
« Reply #1235 on: October 14, 2015, 08:17:21 »

Anyway back to the original topic Smiley In some sections there are just the circular tubes waiting to be cut to size where in other areas there are masts, cross masts and dangly sections (excuse my ignorance on what they are called S&T (Signalling and Telegraph)!)

The "dangly bits" are referred to as "small part steel".  Also, the perceived lack of progress around stations can be partly explained by the fact that the wires will be held up by different types of support.  The most likely type will be a twin track portal arrangement, and that installing this will need fairly major holes to be cut into station canopies and twin track possessions.  Also, there is a gauge clearance exercise to be done too.  The route will be re-gauged to allow W10 and W12 freight wagons to come through, and also to provide adequate clearance for pantographs in accordance with European inter-operability requirements.  This means a measuring and cutting back of the canopies, where the originals are staying, or a rebuild.

Thanks for that - can I ask what is significant about the W10/W12 freight wagons in this respect?
Logged
Visoflex
Full Member
***
Posts: 66


View Profile
« Reply #1236 on: October 14, 2015, 09:05:01 »


Thanks for that - can I ask what is significant about the W10/W12 freight wagons in this respect?

The gauge is dictated by the size of ISO shipping containers.  W10 is a 9'-6" high deep sea container (also known as "High-Cube").  W12 is similar but refrigerated.   This traffic comes through Southampton and needs to go down to Acton or to the WCML (West Coast Main Line).  These tall containers carried on standard UK (United Kingdom) freight wagons could potentially hit overhanging canopies.

See here (http://www.greenlogistics.org/SiteResources/cb01cdef-c5ce-4f19-bcf2-a8fd0aac657a_LRN2008%20Woodburn.pdf) for a better explanation
« Last Edit: October 14, 2015, 09:21:26 by Visoflex » Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #1237 on: October 14, 2015, 10:05:23 »

In real measurements the difference between W10 and W12 is trivial, about 5 cm on the width overall, so an inch each side in old money, so it is almost always an easy win to get W12 rather than W10.   There is no height difference between the gauges.

Another thing about W10 and W12 freight gauges is that they are no higher than 'locomotive gauge' - the work is all about fitting the corners of the boxes through a particular gap.   

One thing that is always true, is that 'electrification' clearance does not automatically bring with it W10/W12 clearance.

I think the comparison drawing that NR» (Network Rail - home page) use in their RUSs (Route Utilisation Strategy) etc (attached below) makes the relative sizes clearer - they show all the container gauges as being within the superimposed locomotive for width, and even W10/W12 is the same height.

Paul
« Last Edit: October 14, 2015, 10:15:20 by paul7755 » Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #1238 on: October 14, 2015, 10:39:05 »

We had another visit from Crossrail yesterday telling us they will be banging away over the weekend. Don't think it will effect us much as the most of the posts near us are already in place.

Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1239 on: October 14, 2015, 12:15:15 »

Really makes you wonder just how far behind they really are now.
Can anyone remember when the first section (was it Reading-Didcot, or Didcot-Swindon?) was supposed to be energised ready for IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) testing to begin? Probably was arround now, so we might get an idea of how far the scheme is behind when that first section is switched on.

Another thing about W10 and W12 freight gauges is that they are no higher than 'locomotive gauge' - the work is all about fitting the corners of the boxes through a particular gap.
Square 'pegs' (containers) and round 'holes' (arched bridges and most tunnels) spring to mind.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10361


View Profile
« Reply #1240 on: October 14, 2015, 12:34:14 »

Can anyone remember when the first section (was it Reading-Didcot, or Didcot-Swindon?) was supposed to be energised ready for IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) testing to begin?

Reading to Didcot and the end of last month IIRC (if I recall/remember/read correctly).  Work really appears to have picked up in pace with many areas now looking ready for the wiring train.  That said there are several locations, mostly around the stations, where there are no sign of gantries as yet - as Visoflex and Berkshire Bugsy were discussing earlier.

If the recent rate of progress is maintained then I'd bet on delivery less than six months late for that section.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #1241 on: October 14, 2015, 14:58:43 »

Square 'pegs' (containers) and round 'holes' (arched bridges and most tunnels) spring to mind.

Indeed,  One of the options for gauge enhancement is to replace an arch bridge with a beam bridge without needing to raise the overall bridge height at all.

Paul7755's link was informative (thanks).  It makes it clear why all this fright gauge enhancement work has little affect on taking us any closer to double decker passenger trains as in Europe, which need extra height in the centre rather than squared-up corners.
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #1242 on: October 14, 2015, 15:02:13 »

Work really appears to have picked up in pace with many areas now looking ready for the wiring train.  .

Does that mean that they have now started to get the hang of the new German work train which were introduced with such fanfare (didn't the Queen name it)?  If so then that is indeed good news for the future as the current issues can be viewed in large part as teething problems rather than anything more permanent . 
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10361


View Profile
« Reply #1243 on: October 14, 2015, 15:12:43 »

Well, it's out pretty much every night, split into various sections with hundreds of staff beetling about nearby.  I still have my doubts as to it ever getting close to the efficiencies expected of it though!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6594


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #1244 on: October 14, 2015, 17:24:25 »

Leaving BRI» (Bristol Temple Meads - next trains) for SWI» (Swindon - next trains) this morning, I spied a lorry load of piles (about 6) unloading at the siding behind Avonmeads. I don't know where they are made, but it's kind of sad to see them arrive by road.
Logged

Now, please!
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 81 82 [83] 84 85 ... 176
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page