Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:55 06 Jan 2025
 
- Taxi driver who stoked Southport riots jailed
- Works on 'road from hell' to end after 23 years
- 'Second chance at life' after UK's first liver transplant for advanced bowel cancer
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 08/01/25 - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
09/01/25 - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
6th Jan (1968)
Hixon Railway accident (link)

Train RunningCancelled
20:37 Looe to Liskeard
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
20:51 Bristol Temple Meads to Bristol Parkway
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
19:36 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
19:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
21:21 Bristol Parkway to Trowbridge
Delayed
19:18 Trowbridge to Cardiff Central
20:22 Reading to Shalford
20:38 Maidenhead to Marlow
21:30 Shalford to Reading
07/01/25 04:50 Fratton to Salisbury
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 06, 2025, 20:59:34 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[97] New Adlestrop Railway Atlas update
[56] Mining in Cornwall
[43] DFT - Where is the South Devon Railway
[41] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[39] Bridport branch reopening proposal
[39] Bath to Bridgnorth and back 4/1/25
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 76 77 [78] 79 80 ... 176
  Print  
Author Topic: Great Western Main Line electrification - ongoing discussion  (Read 1136234 times)
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10166



View Profile
« Reply #1155 on: April 12, 2015, 18:04:20 »

I assume the footbridge in the foreground will now be removed.

Pardon the pun, but it is hardly a step forward if the new footbridge is further from the station exit or further to walk for potential passengers wanting to cross the line for a train.  However without a number of lengthy possessions I suppose there was no alternative.
Logged
BerkshireBugsy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1640


Berkshire Bugsy Jr


View Profile
« Reply #1156 on: April 12, 2015, 18:09:23 »

I assume the footbridge in the foreground will now be removed.

Pardon the pun, but it is hardly a step forward if the new footbridge is further from the station exit or further to walk for potential passengers wanting to cross the line for a train.  However without a number of lengthy possessions I suppose there was no alternative.

Bobm - there is still some work to be done on the new bridge before it can be put into use. For example at the bottom of the bridge steps (on the Thatcham side at least) there is a big gap which will need to be filled with concrete.

I know this has been discussed elsewhere in a different thread but as expected  there are no ramps or lifts and as bobm says they are quite a way down the platform.

Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #1157 on: April 12, 2015, 19:15:11 »

Is there a level crossing behind the photographer?   The OHLE sometimes has to rise up in height over a crossing, and this might constrain the footbridge position, as will the existing platform buildings of course.  There might be no other position that clears the existing buildings on either side and also allows for space beyond for future lifts to be added.

There remains a slim possibility they chose the site at random...

Paul
Logged
Thatcham Crossing
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 793


View Profile
« Reply #1158 on: April 12, 2015, 19:34:29 »

Yes, there is Paul7755, Berkshire Bugsy was standing on the crossing when he took the picture.

The new bridge must have gone up over the weekend BB as it definitely wasn't there on Friday evening when I drove past.
Logged
BerkshireBugsy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1640


Berkshire Bugsy Jr


View Profile
« Reply #1159 on: April 12, 2015, 19:37:48 »

Yes, there is Paul7755, Berkshire Bugsy was standing on the crossing when he took the picture.

The new bridge must have gone up over the weekend BB as it definitely wasn't there on Friday evening when I drove past.

Thanks TC(resolve) - I drove up Friday night and think I would have seen it.

Here are a couple of additional pictures showing the new bridge placement in respect of the existing structures. I have had trouble posting these so apologies if they are duplicates
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #1160 on: April 20, 2015, 13:09:20 »

I assume the footbridge in the foreground will now be removed.

Pardon the pun, but it is hardly a step forward if the new footbridge is further from the station exit or further to walk for potential passengers wanting to cross the line for a train.  However without a number of lengthy possessions I suppose there was no alternative.

Bobm - there is still some work to be done on the new bridge before it can be put into use. For example at the bottom of the bridge steps (on the Thatcham side at least) there is a big gap which will need to be filled with concrete.

I know this has been discussed elsewhere in a different thread but as expected  there are no ramps or lifts and as bobm says they are quite a way down the platform.


Really? No ramps or lifts? I'm very surprised if that's not in contravention of the Disabled Access Act, or whatever it's called.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
BerkshireBugsy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1640


Berkshire Bugsy Jr


View Profile
« Reply #1161 on: April 20, 2015, 13:12:13 »

I assume the footbridge in the foreground will now be removed.

Pardon the pun, but it is hardly a step forward if the new footbridge is further from the station exit or further to walk for potential passengers wanting to cross the line for a train.  However without a number of lengthy possessions I suppose there was no alternative.



Bobm - there is still some work to be done on the new bridge before it can be put into use. For example at the bottom of the bridge steps (on the Thatcham side at least) there is a big gap which will need to be filled with concrete.

I know this has been discussed elsewhere in a different thread but as expected  there are no ramps or lifts and as bobm says they are quite a way down the platform.


Really? No ramps or lifts? I'm very surprised if that's not in contravention of the Disabled Access Act, or whatever it's called.

I haven't been down there for a week but my understanding is that because there are ramps to each platform and it is possible to cross via the level crossing they are not needed.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13019


View Profile Email
« Reply #1162 on: April 20, 2015, 13:14:00 »

Yes, that is correct
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #1163 on: April 20, 2015, 13:17:21 »

Ok, thanks!
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6551


View Profile
« Reply #1164 on: May 11, 2015, 06:16:07 »

If you want to see what services are looking like during the work between Bath-Chippenham 18-31 July and from 1 August, these are now showing on Real Time Trains. A place I regularly visit for timetables during Engineering works on the FGW (First Great Western) network now FGW don't bother any more (sigh)
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6551


View Profile
« Reply #1165 on: June 12, 2015, 16:50:34 »

We have a timetable for phase 1 of the works between Chippenham and Bath from 18th-31st July:
https://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/-/media/pdf/travel-updates/gw1506%20bath%20timetable%20v4.pdf?la=en
Logged
Phil
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2061



View Profile
« Reply #1166 on: June 12, 2015, 19:31:32 »

Parochial, I know, but I can't help but love how Melksham gets a namecheck in the timetable headings ["LONDON TO SWINDON, MELKSHAM, BATH,
BRISTOL AND SOUTH WALES"] whereas Trowbridge doesn't. Ha.
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6594


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #1167 on: June 12, 2015, 23:25:41 »

Parochial, I know, but I can't help but love how Melksham gets a namecheck in the timetable headings ["LONDON TO SWINDON, MELKSHAM, BATH,
BRISTOL AND SOUTH WALES"] whereas Trowbridge doesn't. Ha.

Surely a mere oversight, given Trowbridge's legendary status in the field of, er, ...
Logged

Now, please!
Phil
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2061



View Profile
« Reply #1168 on: June 13, 2015, 06:46:20 »


Surely a mere oversight, given Trowbridge's legendary status in the field of, er, ...

Shorthand. Isaac Pitman was born there. To be fair, Trowbridge knew their rightful place in the world right up until British Rail's days, when the station was named "Trowbridge - Junction for Melksham"; it's only in recent years it's got ideas above it's station (as it were)

Anyway, back to the original subject....
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43052



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1169 on: June 13, 2015, 07:02:23 »

For those two weeks, Trowbridge will share the distinction with Coombe of being a station where trains pull up just short of the station (not at a platform) and reverse to carry on their journey.  I can kinda understand it at Coombe ... at a county town with a population of around 30,000 and 850,000 passenger journeys per year, it seems a bit of an odd thing to be doing!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 76 77 [78] 79 80 ... 176
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page