Thatcham Crossing
|
|
« Reply #1125 on: February 26, 2015, 13:17:19 » |
|
Ever so slightly tongue in cheek there I suspect (and hope) BB
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #1126 on: February 26, 2015, 13:36:08 » |
|
As for DfT» , they don't even have plans for the younger IC225 sets on the ECML▸ after IEP▸ , so I very much doubt they have plans for IC125s. Please don't quote facts when you can't possibly know! Scotrail will have contracted for certain HSTs▸ , not just 'any' HSTs. I understand they have contracted those being released by FGW▸ , not East Coast? Possibly even from a different ROSCO» ? And quote your sources re the DfT and having plans for rolling stock, or couch your statement differently This is likely *your opinion*, not the DfT's. My bet is that they *do* have plans for all stock being released, but it may not be ever set in stone & can be changed.
|
|
« Last Edit: February 26, 2015, 13:43:34 by ChrisB »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #1127 on: February 26, 2015, 13:42:48 » |
|
ScotRail will probably want to get its hands on whichever IC125s are released first, since the refurbishment they have planned before the trains enter service is MAJOR. As for DfT» , they don't even have plans for the younger IC225 sets on the ECML▸ after IEP▸ , so I very much doubt they have plans for IC125s. My opinion is that planning a new fleet without having plans for the existing assets is daft, but that's the DfT and the fragmented rail industy for you.
It's not up to the DfT what they do with the existing assets. They'll say it's for the owners to decide extended or new leases. Hmm - not sure about that. Yes, if they want to hold onto them, but if one of the options offered to East Coast was that they took IEPs in exchange for the 225s, then the DfT will have alternative plans. For example, FGW▸ can only cascade the turbos with the DfTs approval - if the DfT thought they'd (for example) better off being deployed in place of Northern's Pacers, then that's what would happen....Of course, in 'agreement' with (read money changing hands, and other stock options) FGW The DfT will say they don't micro-manage the stock, but I reckon otherwise. Nothing happens stock-wise without the DfTs agreement
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rhydgaled
|
|
« Reply #1128 on: February 26, 2015, 13:53:20 » |
|
Please don't quote facts when you can't possibly know!
Scotrail will have contracted for certain HSTs▸ , not just 'any' HSTs. I understand they have contracted those being released by FGW▸ , not East Coast? Possibly even from a different ROSCO» ? I did say 'probably'. It was an uninformed guess and perhaps I should have made that clearer. Sorry. You make a good point that ScotRail may have already a committed deal with a ROSCO, which I didn't think of. And quote your sources re the DfT» and having plans for rolling stock, or couch your statement differently This is likely *your opinion*, not the DfT's. My bet is that they *do* have plans for all stock being released, but it may not be ever set in stone & can be changed. I'm sure I have a letter somewhere that states that the DfT's view on the future of the existing stock is a matter for the TOCs▸ and ROSCOs. As I stated in my post, I personally think that is a very silly view for the DfT to take given that they mandated use of IEP▸ on GWML▸ and ECML▸ .
|
|
|
Logged
|
---------------------------- Don't DOO▸ it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #1129 on: February 26, 2015, 13:56:51 » |
|
The only recent occurance of TOCs▸ beating the DfT» to reallocations was the TPE▸ loss of the 17x's to Chiltern. But then theyu failed by finding TPE a solution.....
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Electric train
|
|
« Reply #1130 on: February 26, 2015, 19:08:19 » |
|
Had a little bit of inside info today, Not all of the delay is down to NR» some of it is down to DfT» Boundary Rd bridge in Newbury DfT have not approved the awarded the contract for this replacement. Oxford Stn looks like 2016 or even 2017 before DfT get around to this rebuild Plus there are some other sensitive issues on the route down to DfT that I was not made fully privy too. Looks like a playground bundle coming up soon
|
|
|
Logged
|
Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
|
|
|
ray951
|
|
« Reply #1131 on: February 26, 2015, 21:00:39 » |
|
Electric train said "Oxford Stn looks like 2016 or even 2017 before DfT» get around to this rebuild."
I travel between Didcot and Oxford everyday and have noticed that the holes have been dug and a lost of piles have been added between Didcot and Kennington Junc. But between Kennington Junc and Oxford no visible work for electrification has taken place, of course it could be that they are undertaking the work in stages but I wonder if they haven't started because of all the changes that are planned at Oxford station. They also don't appear to have done any work on the 3 footbridges between Kennington Junc and Oxford assuming of course that they need to be raised.
Does anybody know what the blue 'crash-like' barriers that are attached to the track and appear next to the piles are for? Lots of these have appeared between Didcot and Oxford usually adjacent to the piles but not always.
In other developments they still appear to laying the cable from Didcot Power station to the feedin substation at Foxhall Junction and although they have built the road to the substation it doesn't look as if any building has taken place yet.
The good news is that Basil Hill Road bridge in Didcot has just reopened and the temporary footbridge from Didcot Parkway to the car park is almost complete so that the permanent footbridge can be replaced/raised.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Electric train
|
|
« Reply #1132 on: February 26, 2015, 21:42:32 » |
|
Does anybody know what the blue 'crash-like' barriers that are attached to the track and appear next to the piles are for? Lots of these have appeared between Didcot and Oxford usually adjacent to the piles but not always.
The blue fencing provides a "Green Fenced Zone" for working it saves the need for a look out when you are working behind it although a Controller of Site Safety is still needed In other developments they still appear to laying the cable from Didcot Power station to the feedin substation at Foxhall Junction and although they have built the road to the substation it doesn't look as if any building has taken place yet.
You'll be amazed, astonished, bemused when you do see what is going to go on site The switchgear is one of the last items to arrive on site, then there will be a lot of site wiring and testing and finally commissioned into service.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
|
|
|
ellendune
|
|
« Reply #1133 on: February 26, 2015, 22:17:22 » |
|
My opinion is that planning a new fleet without having plans for the existing assets is daft, but that's the DfT» and the fragmented rail industy for you.
Quite apart from the points made by others your argument would carry more weight if the HSTs▸ weren't already nearly 40 years old. Why would they need to plan a future for life expired stock? The March edition of Modern Railways is reporting that DfT have asked FGW▸ to seek a price for an additional order of IEPs▸ for the West of England services. It says that cascading Midland class 222 DEMUs▸ has been ruled out due to the delays to Midland electrification and the use of life extended HSTs has been ruled out.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Posts: 6594
The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!
|
|
« Reply #1134 on: February 26, 2015, 23:00:30 » |
|
The blue fencing provides a "Green Fenced Zone" for working it saves the need for a look out when you are working behind it although a Controller of Site Safety is still needed
Blue - the new green, eh? This will not be the first time that we have had brand spanking new kit waiting for the infrastructure to catch up. The new order for IEPs▸ , if confirmed, shows either that things have changed since the first order was placed, or it was underestimated in the first place. Hopefully, we'll get them at a decent price still. Why is FGW▸ being asked to to the dealing, though, rather than DfT» ?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Now, please!
|
|
|
ellendune
|
|
« Reply #1135 on: February 26, 2015, 23:08:13 » |
|
Why is FGW▸ being asked to to the dealing, though, rather than DfT» ?
As they keep saying they do not deal in rolling stock.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ellendune
|
|
« Reply #1136 on: February 26, 2015, 23:22:30 » |
|
Despite the assertion that DfT» do not plan rolling stock allocation, Modern Railways is reporting that DfT is coming up with a rolling stock cascade plan. This is said to include transfer of 387/1 s to FGW▸ . The first units with transfer in 2016 with the rest to follow in 2018. They also suggest that the remaining 365 sets not being retained by Govia will also transfer to FGW for use on the stopping services out of Paddington.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Posts: 6594
The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!
|
|
« Reply #1137 on: February 27, 2015, 08:04:06 » |
|
BBC» West report today that the hold-up is because of power supply problems.
Hmm...
|
|
|
Logged
|
Now, please!
|
|
|
Rhydgaled
|
|
« Reply #1138 on: February 27, 2015, 09:16:02 » |
|
My opinion is that planning a new fleet without having plans for the existing assets is daft, but that's the DfT» and the fragmented rail industy for you.
Quite apart from the points made by others your argument would carry more weight if the HSTs▸ weren't already nearly 40 years old. Why would they need to plan a future for life expired stock? The IC125s may be nearly 40, but the IC225s aren't. he March edition of Modern Railways is reporting that DfT have asked FGW▸ to seek a price for an additional order of IEPs▸ for the West of England services. It says that cascading Midland class 222 DEMUs▸ has been ruled out due to the delays to Midland electrification and the use of life extended HSTs has been ruled out. Sounds like somebody has forgotten what was said by (if I recall correctly) by First Great Western's MD in Modern Railways some time ago. He ruled out 222s back then saying something like 'passengers do not like the cramped interiors and underfloor diesel engines of those trains'. That ought to rule out IEP too.
|
|
|
Logged
|
---------------------------- Don't DOO▸ it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
|
|
|
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 5450
There are some who call me... Tim
|
|
« Reply #1139 on: February 27, 2015, 09:28:39 » |
|
...Blue - the new green, eh?
May I recommend this YouTube video?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
|
|
|
|