Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:15 10 Jan 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 14/01/25 - Rail Sale starts
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
10th Jan (2017)
Defibrillators discussion pack published by Network Rail (link)

Train RunningCancelled
15:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
16:12 London Paddington to Bristol Parkway
16:32 Great Malvern to London Paddington
16:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
17:18 London Paddington to Swansea
17:20 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
17:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Additional 18:10 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
19:04 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:04 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
Short Run
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:20 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:15 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
17:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
17:52 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
17:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
17:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:04 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
18:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:38 Barnstaple to Exmouth
18:38 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
22:50 Salisbury to Portsmouth Harbour
Delayed
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:33 Barnstaple to Exeter Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 18:17:57 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[103] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[98] Westminster Hall debate : Railway services to South West
[97] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[87] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[41] Birthday trip, Melksham to Penzance - 28th January 2025
[22] A Beginner's Guide to the Great Western "Coffee Shop" Passenge...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
Author Topic: Is the half hourly between Cardiff and Paddington really justified in todays eco  (Read 15210 times)
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: July 06, 2009, 16:46:46 »

I can see the case for axing a few of the very empty services to Cardiff.  If...

a) enough sets were released for long enough to improve services to/beyond Exeter/Plymouth at times peoples are likely to use them.

b) half of the Temple Meads trains are extended to Cardiff (although not via Parkway because two reversals will just slow things down and i doubt that parkway gets much off-peak custom and there are XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) links from Parkway to BTM (Bristol Temple Meads (strictly, it should be BRI))).

c) extra Chipenham-Bath-TM(resolve)-Newport-Cardiff-Swansea capacity provided by b) was provided at sensible times to fit into the existing inadequate service.

if those condictions could be met, a reorganisation would actually improve overall service levels, provide some new journey oportunities (ie, Chippenham to Swansea direct) although I admit that Cardiff-London would suffer slightly. 

Someone needs to do the sums and find the answer. 
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6555


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: July 06, 2009, 17:18:32 »

of course what makes it appear worse is that most of them want to sit in coach E, giving the impression that the train has filled up (to everyone else in coach E), but that's an argument for a different thread...  Grin
Oh it is flamingo but I can't help but make a quick comment on why everyone wants to cram into the middle of the train when there are five other perfectly good and less crowded carriages. Almost always plenty of space in coach A so long as you keep it quiet!
Logged
matt473
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 374


View Profile Email
« Reply #17 on: July 06, 2009, 17:29:41 »

I think it should be seen as a compliment to FGW (First Great Western) that people wish to travel on their trains when they could use ATW (Arriva Trains Wales (former TOC (Train Operating Company)))  Wink. Tbh I feel that the best way of dealing with the problem has recently been handed back to the ROSCO» (Rolling Stock Owning Company - about) by FGW. I am obviously talking about the 180s which love them or loath them, were ideal for Cardiff/Bristol-London freeing up hsts for longer distance services. If someone high up had been thinking properly, the south west could of had the hsts which are currently on the hourly Cardiff-London trains which would be ran by the 180s increasing services overall.
Logged
bemmy
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 270



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: July 06, 2009, 19:05:09 »

I think Bemmy's comment about services arriving any a few minutes apart applies to what would happen if half the paddington-parkway-cardiff servcies were axed and half of the BTM (Bristol Temple Meads (strictly, it should be BRI)) services extended to Paddington.  They would take longer to get to Cardiff and consequntly would not be too far behind the next direct service.
Correct..... sorry matt473, I should've put a relevant quote to make that clear.
Quote
Cardiff is smaller than Sheffield which only gets an hourly service to London.
But Cardiff is more of a regional centre than Sheffield: it serves a large population in the valleys, while Sheffield has a smaller hinterland, being relatively close to a number of other large cities.

I think what also needs to be taken into account is that the London-Cardiff service is the only regular intercity service that Cardiff recieves which is pretty poor considering the city of its size and the fact it is th capital of Wales. The only other intercity service is the token Crosscountry service which runs one service each way most days. If the half hourly frequency was withdrawn then it would be a PR (Public Relations) and politcal nightmare.
Although more trains to London doesn't make up for the lack of intercity trains to other places. The simple solution would be to upgrade the hourly Birmingham service to intercity status.
Logged
Jez
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 516


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: July 07, 2009, 00:35:20 »


[/quote] Although more trains to London doesn't make up for the lack of intercity trains to other places. The simple solution would be to upgrade the hourly Birmingham service to intercity status.
[/quote]

They have made a start by having a small First Class section on Cardiff-Notts service. Although yes it takes more than that to make an intercity service.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: July 07, 2009, 14:32:51 »

I'd say its fairly Intercity:

Cardiff - Newport - Gloucester - Cheltenham - B'ham New Street
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: July 07, 2009, 15:22:09 »

It's not InterCity. It stops (and should stop) at local places such as Tewkesbury (aka Ashchurch).

It is run by 170s. Hardly InterCity rolling stock.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: July 07, 2009, 16:10:35 »

It's not InterCity.

Well, it is, as it is long distance. It should not be stopping at small places such as Tewkesbury. The idea of the service is that people are able to travel to the Midlands from South Wales and Gloucestershire, not local passengers commute into Birmingham/Cheltenham.

By your own reasoning (based on your opinions of the Cotswolds) local passengers should be on a local service and subsequently change Wink
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: July 07, 2009, 16:34:46 »

But it is Ashchurch's service to Birmingham! Besdies, Tewkesbury is a fairly large place.

If XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) want to offer an additional fast service, so much the better. If this requires people to change, so be it. But the current service is the local service for places between Newport and Gloucester.
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: July 07, 2009, 19:09:09 »

Coming back to the question, a pax count of the 1055 Cardiff to London today showed around 140 standard class pax between Swindon and Didcot. 

I would expect at that time of day the heavier flow is still into London, so maybe the reverse workings would be even quieter?   
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #25 on: July 07, 2009, 20:49:14 »

Could it be that everyone knows that you're safer in the middle of train? You're also usually nearer the paltform exits on most through stations. Plus closer to the Buffet if there is one.

Also you don't have to walk so far at Padd. Try Coach A Padd to Slough on an HST (High Speed Train) you walk miles both ends.
« Last Edit: July 09, 2009, 17:23:54 by eightf48544 » Logged
TerminalJunkie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 919



View Profile
« Reply #26 on: July 07, 2009, 21:16:29 »

Could it be that everyone knows that your [sic] safer in the mifddle [sic] of train?

Of course, that's not always the case...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYubpuIe3cw

Logged

Daily Mail and Daily Express readers please click here.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10365


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: July 07, 2009, 21:20:17 »

Also you don't have to walk so far at Padd. Try Coach A Padd to Slough on an HST (High Speed Train) you walk miles both ends.

Well, more like 200 metres, but it is the case that some regular passengers on short routes like Padd-Slough would rather stand for the 15 minutes or so than walk down the far end of the train where there are plenty of seats. A strange concept for me to grasp, but it does happen!

If I was asked to estimate the number of people who unnecessarily stand on FGW (First Great Western) services, then I'd guess it was somewhere between 25-40% of the total standees - i.e. a large number of people! Split between those who choose to stand and those who don't realise there are seats in a different carriage. Some TM(resolve)'s could do a lot better at informing passengers that there are seats further down the train.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Jez
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 516


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: July 07, 2009, 21:27:26 »

It's not InterCity.

Well, it is, as it is long distance. It should not be stopping at small places such as Tewkesbury. The idea of the service is that people are able to travel to the Midlands from South Wales and Gloucestershire, not local passengers commute into Birmingham/Cheltenham.

By your own reasoning (based on your opinions of the Cotswolds) local passengers should be on a local service and subsequently change Wink

I agree.  From my understanding of intercity services, they call at cities or major towns i.e. Cardiff - Padd calls at Newport, Bristol P, Swindon, Reading.

The Cardiff to Notts service calls at cities and major towns only (apart from University which it seems to call at every hour).  Its only very occasionally it calls at places such as Chepstow, Lydney, Ashchurch, Willington and Beeston.  There is a local service between Cardiff-Cheltenham which calls at smaller stations and I think XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) also run an hourly service between Brum and Notts which calls at smaller stations.

When Central Trains ran this service it called at many more stations including Ashchurch and Beeston every hour. I believe it was branded "citylink" by Central Trains. Since XC took over its become more intercity, possibly because XC run so many other long distance services.
« Last Edit: July 07, 2009, 21:34:01 by Jez » Logged
Jez
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 516


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: July 07, 2009, 21:32:00 »

Coming back to the question, a pax count of the 1055 Cardiff to London today showed around 140 standard class pax between Swindon and Didcot. 

I would expect at that time of day the heavier flow is still into London, so maybe the reverse workings would be even quieter?   

Plenty of passengers waiting for the 1555 as well - the 1545 Notts service departed a few mins late but plenty of people still stood on platform 1 waiting for the 1555 to arrive.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page