Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:55 10 Jan 2025
 
- Two million discounted tickets up for grabs in rail sale
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 14/01/25 - Rail Sale starts
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
11th Jan (2012)
TVM - a fair weather facility? (link)

Train RunningCancelled
23:03 Salisbury to Portsmouth & Southsea
23:14 London Paddington to Oxford
Short Run
22:50 Salisbury to Portsmouth Harbour
Delayed
19:04 London Paddington to Penzance
23:42 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 11, 2025, 00:04:15 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[109] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[96] Westminster Hall debate : Railway services to South West
[59] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[53] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[49] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[38] GWR Advance Purchase sale - January 2025
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7
  Print  
Author Topic: First Class Weekend Upgrade  (Read 42803 times)
Mookiemoo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3117


View Profile Email
« Reply #45 on: June 19, 2009, 10:26:08 »

I think a lot of the griping is on the ay FGW (First Great Western) treat the cotswolds - they WOS» (Worcester Shrub Hill - next trains)/HFD» (Hereford - next trains) as an extension of oxford not as a long distance service

Forget Bristol/Swindon - take any other 130 minute journey in FGW - would they get regular turbostution, 2+7 running etc etc

Logged

Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."

"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #46 on: June 19, 2009, 16:12:05 »

Is it better than a few years ago  Huh
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #47 on: June 19, 2009, 18:13:43 »

If the Cotswold was run like an InterCity route, with guaranteed HSTs (High Speed Train) etc. blah blah like ALL other FGW (First Great Western) HSS (High Speed Services), I would not have a grip.

I can understand why FGW don't offer Standard Advance fares as seats are often full beyond Oxford with walk up tickets (esp when a Turbo is running!).

But to charge ^15 on top of the Standard fare for Standard class level seating, no guarantee of refreshment, no free refreshments.

And as much as you deny it, long distance travel AND commuting have suffered! I know lot's of people who have abandoned the route - both commuters to Worcester from Pershore/Evehsam, and businessmen, who now drive - either the full way, or to Warwick Parkway. Hopefully both of these can be rectified partially by the re-doubling (but it'll take a few years, and a marketing campaign), but if anything but 125 mph InterCity stock keeps heading our way, people will keep deserting the line.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #48 on: June 19, 2009, 19:08:34 »

But to charge ^15 on top of the Standard fare for Standard class level seating, no guarantee of refreshment, no free refreshments.

Sit in bloody standard class then! There is no obligation to take up the upgrade offer. If you consider it not worth the money, don't part with your cash. Simple.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #49 on: June 19, 2009, 19:35:12 »

If the Cotswold was run like an InterCity route, with guaranteed HSTs (High Speed Train) etc. blah blah like ALL other FGW (First Great Western) HSS (High Speed Services), I would not have a grip.

Should still fit the racks surely, whatever train they put on?
Grin

Paul 
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #50 on: June 19, 2009, 21:24:05 »

Quote
regular turbostution

When? Yes there are Turbos out there, but they are the ones in the timetable, as Industry Insider pointed out previously. I haven't come across one on a train it shouldn't be on for several months. No, the Turbos aren't in great shape and are booked on trains they shouldn't be operating, notably the 8.52 from Malvern, but when have you actually travelled on one recently, given that as far as I can gather you always use services that are going to be HSTs (High Speed Train) come hell or high water, ie the earlies from WOS» (Worcester Shrub Hill - next trains), the Herefords or the 17.51?

And what's wrong with a 2+7 set? It's still an HST.

Quote
But to charge ^15 on top of the Standard fare for Standard class level seating, no guarantee of refreshment, no free refreshments.

No-one in their right mind would pay to upgrade on a Turbo anyway and since you never seem to use FGW (First Great Western) to reach London these days, why on earth are you banging on and on and on and on about this? Maybe you're going to start condemning Chiltern for not having first class at all and denying you the right to bang on about their upgrade policy.

And how on earth can you claim businessmen are leaving because of Turbos? Every peak train from Worcester except the stopper has been 125mph stock for several years. Same applies in the reverse direction, apart from the 17.51's past bouts of mainly Adelante-inflicted issues - reliability and punctuality is the key issue, as it is for everyone, usually followed by fares and value for money, and the December 2006 and 2007 timetable changes produced appalling performance for many weeks. I was pretty hacked off with the situation, to put it politely, and I don't doubt some people voted with their feet after that, but because of turbos... oh please. How did the poor delicate flowers from Worcester tolerate it for those 11 years when apart from the herefords it was Turbos all the way?

Quote
they WOS/HFD» (Hereford - next trains) as an extension of oxford not as a long distance service

That might be because that's what it is and has been ever since 1993 - before then, the "long-distance service" consisted of two Hereford-London expresses in the morning, and two back in the evening, with an off-peak London-Malvern and back in the middle of the day. Most of the rest of the time since the 1970s it was change at Oxford.

Turbos in 1993 meant almost all trains became through to and from London and this pattern persisted into privatisation. It is only since late 2004, with FGW taking over from Thames and the arrival of Adelantes, that there was intercity stock at other times of the day than the HSTs on the Herefords.

It isn't a pure long-distance service and it never has been, ever since the line opened in 1853 - because, just to upset you all again, Hereford and Worcester aren't big enough to support the kind of services the likes of Swindon, Bristol, Cardiff, the West Midlands, Yorkshire, Manchester et al get. It's always been a compromise between the different needs of different communities on the route and compromises mean you don't get what you want all the time.
Logged
Mookiemoo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3117


View Profile Email
« Reply #51 on: June 19, 2009, 21:50:55 »

Is it better than a few years ago  Huh

No

When I started this in 2004, I could get to London in around 2 hours.  Ok, out of five days, three were on time, 1 was late, one was very late.  Now, its nearly 2.5 hours with time built in to naval gaze.  The fact it made it on time 60% of the time proved it COULD be done.

THAT is probably why people have deserted the north western end of the route - it just takes too godamn long.  I suspect its that more than the turbos.

I havent travelled on a turbo because I specifically go out of my way to avoid them.  e.g. even if I dont have to be in the office until the afternoon, ill still most likely get the 0735 to avoid being stuck on a bloody turbo!

I know if I were in London - I would not use FGW (First Great Western) anymore - I'd even suffer LM (London Midland - recent franchise) from kiddie (and you know my views on them).  The fact im currently in the thames valley means the timing is about the same but going via euston has too many changes and too much risk of error!   

To be honest, The best situation would be - Genuine peak expresses only going through followed by connections at oxford - oh sorry, thats what we had back in 2004!  then - the expresses WOULD be busy from HFD» (Hereford - next trains)/WOS» (Worcester Shrub Hill - next trains) and it would be worth running them.  At the moment, there are too many trains that run just too slowly


Logged

Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."

"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #52 on: June 19, 2009, 23:03:13 »

I think we are getting mixed up between weekday peaks - which are HSTs (High Speed Train), and less Turbos turn up on those now - and the Weekend (esp the morning service) where Turbos are common.

We all have the gripe about the first off peak train being a Turbo, etc.

Quote
No-one in their right mind would pay to upgrade on a Turbo anyway
Who in their right mind is going to upgrade on the Cotswold, where a Turbo could be subbed? That's my complaint about the weekend first price.

Quote
Maybe you're going to start condemning Chiltern for not having first class at all and denying you the right to bang on about their upgrade policy.
Not sure what you're on about here, so I'll assume you're being sarcastic... Wink

Fallen Angel is right about the peak service requirements. There is huge potential in the Hereford, Malvern, Worcester areas - I expect FGW (First Great Western) will start to unlock it with the re-doubling. The shuttles proposed will allow Hanborough to be dropped from most trains... Grin
Logged
cereal_basher
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 148


View Profile
« Reply #53 on: June 19, 2009, 23:42:02 »

What don't you get about the FC(resolve) upgrade? You pay on the train. So if it is a turbo, you wouldn't pay, as it would be pointless. If it was a HST (High Speed Train) you would pay, simple. People won't pay ^15 to upgrade on a turbo, but you will know if you are on an HST, if you are, you will upgrade. Quite simple really.
Logged
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #54 on: June 19, 2009, 23:52:30 »


No-one in their right mind would pay to upgrade on a Turbo anyway


oh dear.. I've done this several times before.. First class on a turbo is usually more comfortable than the rest of the train...

hhmm does that mean I'm not in my right mind?  Grin Smiley
Logged
Mookiemoo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3117


View Profile Email
« Reply #55 on: June 19, 2009, 23:55:58 »

So FGW (First Great Western) are missing a trick then

If I were unlucky enough to be on a turbo *I* probably would - I need a ****** table!

However, exclude isiots like me.......

there are 32 seats on a turbo in FC(resolve) on a 166 - which is NORMALLY what they put on

Say there are two fallen angels - that leaves 30 - so they get 2 * 15 = 30

Put it at 5 for an upgrade and I bet you'd get another 30 suckers to pay up - 30 * 5 = 150

TBH (to be honest) - I dont know other than the cotswolds where FC is regared as FC on a turbo anyway - so many are DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) that the FC compartment is a free for all!
Logged

Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."

"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
cereal_basher
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 148


View Profile
« Reply #56 on: June 20, 2009, 00:03:03 »

Isn't there tables in standard class on a Class 166 though? So you might not have to upgrade to first class. I don't think lowering the price is viable really as it would be unfair to lower the HST (High Speed Train) price to ^5 and if you had to different fares based on the type of train it would both confuse and annoy people.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10365


View Profile
« Reply #57 on: June 20, 2009, 00:05:03 »

TBH (to be honest) - I dont know other than the cotswolds where FC(resolve) is regared as FC on a turbo anyway - so many are DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) that the FC compartment is a free for all!

The Reading-Redhill/Gatwick's are the only other obvious reasonably long-distance service where 1st Class is able to be monitored by a Senior Conductor.

There are a total of four tables in a 166, so yes, but not many!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Mookiemoo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3117


View Profile Email
« Reply #58 on: June 20, 2009, 00:10:36 »

Er - a small triangle thing that pretends to be a table!

I dont have a pic but they arent what most people think a table would be
Logged

Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."

"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10365


View Profile
« Reply #59 on: June 20, 2009, 11:19:59 »

Er - a small triangle thing that pretends to be a table!

I dont have a pic but they arent what most people think a table would be

Er - No, you're wrong. The 166's have four proper tables in standard class, located in the centre carriage - nothing pretend about them! The rest of the train is fitted out with the little triangular things which are designed to hold a drink, sandwich and crisps and not much else!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page