Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:35 10 Jan 2025
 
* Three teens arrested over boy's bus station death
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 14/01/25 - Rail Sale starts
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
10th Jan (1863)
Metropolitain line opened from Paddington (link)

Train RunningCancelled
16:32 Great Malvern to London Paddington
16:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
17:18 London Paddington to Swansea
17:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Additional 18:10 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
19:04 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:04 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
19:36 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
23:03 Salisbury to Portsmouth & Southsea
23:14 London Paddington to Oxford
Short Run
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
17:52 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
17:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
17:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:04 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
18:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:38 Barnstaple to Exmouth
18:38 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
22:50 Salisbury to Portsmouth Harbour
Delayed
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:33 Barnstaple to Exeter Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 18:50:18 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[149] Westminster Hall debate : Railway services to South West
[97] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[91] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[81] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[38] Birthday trip, Melksham to Penzance - 28th January 2025
[20] A Beginner's Guide to the Great Western "Coffee Shop" Passenge...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Print  
Author Topic: Paddington Underground station  (Read 11546 times)
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10365


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: July 01, 2009, 23:34:01 »

TfL» (Transport for London - about) were running the new T Cup service at the weekend to test the timeable, however they weren't advertising the fact.  Some FGW (First Great Western) stations had signs saying for the northern half of the Circle to use the H&C station at Paddington.

www.diamondgeezer.blogspot.com  charted the experiment

The part-closure of the Piccadilly Line for engineering work meant large numbers of foreign travellers with luggage heading to the airport were turning up at Paddington which was adding to the confusion!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #31 on: July 06, 2009, 18:51:42 »

Where is the logic in this decision??

Last time I arrived at Paddington, it was straight onto the Circle Line and round to Tower Bridge which was a seemingly easy journey to take. (Outer Loop)

1) A increase in reliability across ALL sub surface lines.

2) A DOUBLING of frequency to Hammersmith - including to the new Shepherds Bush shopping centre.

You'll still be able to do that above journey - the only difference is that it'll be more reliable (and you'll wait less time for a train unless going beyond Algate).

Only disadvantage is the loss of Western side to Northern side stations. Boo hoo - either go the long way round or take the Piccadilly line!
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #32 on: July 07, 2009, 14:47:44 »


Only disadvantage is the loss of Western side to Northern side stations. Boo hoo - either go the long way round or take the Piccadilly line!


Who is going to go wrong way High Street to Baker Street? They'll all have to change?
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #33 on: July 07, 2009, 15:19:39 »

What I mean, is if the platform change at Edgware Road is too much for you, get to your destination going anticlockwise. Or by taking a alternative line.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #34 on: July 07, 2009, 15:22:00 »

Or just keep things like they are.  Tongue

However, I suspect there is a flat junction that restricts the number of trains that can run.
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #35 on: July 07, 2009, 19:54:18 »

Paddington, Victoria, Edgware Road, and Hyde Park Corner tube stations were or still are closed to a certain extent today due to flooding, according to this article - http://www.thelondonpaper.com/thelondonpaper/news/london/commuter-chaos-as-london-underground-hit-by-flooding

Mainline services from Victoria were also closed.

BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) article - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8139435.stm
« Last Edit: July 07, 2009, 20:22:48 by Lee Fletcher » Logged

Vous devez ĂȘtre impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #36 on: July 07, 2009, 21:12:37 »

Or just keep things like they are.  Tongue

You could Cool , but the reasons the sub surface lines are so unreliable are:

(a) the flat junctions, as you say

(b) the fact that the Circle line has no recovery time. The new plans will provide 2 places for Circle trains to recover, without affecting journey times or frequencies.
Logged
plymothian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 848


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: July 07, 2009, 22:19:55 »

The new T-Cup service does not eliminate the flat junctions, just (supposedly) the recovery time, as train paths still cross at Praed Street junction.  The experiments have shown that Edgware Road can get quite crowded even in relatively quiet times when there's a gap in the service.
Logged

Please be aware that only the first 4 words of this post will be platformed on this message board.
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #38 on: July 09, 2009, 11:28:09 »

I do wonder how Edware Road will cope with the number of trains. I suspect that District line services will be axed. Angry

The T-Cup does not eliminate flat junctions, but removes one from the network, and since the trains will be running more on time, the others should be less of a problem.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: July 09, 2009, 14:05:41 »

I do wonder how Edware Road will cope with the number of trains. I suspect that District line services will be axed. Angry

The T-Cup does not eliminate flat junctions, but removes one from the network, and since the trains will be running more on time, the others should be less of a problem.

There was a suggestion that some Wimbleware services would stop short at HSK, but that hasn't been the case on the trial weekends so far.

Please explain which flat junction is 'removed' - (I take it you mean no longer an issue, rather than physically removed?) - because I think the T Cup actually increases the conflicting moves over Praed St junction, west of Edgware Rd.

Paul
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #40 on: July 09, 2009, 17:19:38 »

Terminating the Wimbleware services at HSK would considerably reduce the services from HSK, NHG and Bayswater to Padd.

Terminating and reversing the Outer Circle at Edgware also increases movements over Pread Street Junction plus eliminate through HSK etc. Baker Street  and Eastward services.

A lot of people seem to catch the Inner rail circle at Baker Street who are still on the train when I get out at Padd.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #41 on: July 09, 2009, 18:44:02 »

I don't have much knowledge of Praed Street Junction. But I assumed terminating trains from the West Circle would not interfere with H&C/Cirlce trains to/from Hammersmith.

Anyway - whether or not this is the case, the fact of the matter is that there is no opportunity of recovery on the Circle line as it is. Introducing more station dwells will reduce the frequency on all sub surface lines. The T-Cup is the only viable way of increasing reliability.

And there is the extra trains on the Hammersmith branch - also serving the new shopping centre.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #42 on: July 09, 2009, 18:48:49 »

Btline, I thought you were obsessed with removing slack yet are supporting adding of it?

This is of course likely to lead to slack running!  Huh
Logged
plymothian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 848


View Profile
« Reply #43 on: July 09, 2009, 21:41:30 »

Terminating outer circle and district trains have to cross the paths of Hammersmith bound trains as the through platforms will be the outer two faces at Edgware Road.  This provides cross platform interchange for westbound on circles, but a having to use the bridge for circle services eastbound.  Likewise arriving on the district involves using the bridge.  Of course, passengers from Hammersmith bound services could cross platform to the District to go to to Paddington and beyond, changing at HSK. 
Currently Edgware Road's passenger information, and size is woefully inadequate for what will be such a major interchange.
Logged

Please be aware that only the first 4 words of this post will be platformed on this message board.
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #44 on: July 09, 2009, 22:22:51 »

Btline, I thought you were obsessed with removing slack yet are supporting adding of it?

Am I? Quote a section where I support adding slack. Huh

A key to a punctual railway is good turn around time. The current Circle line, by definaition, has no such time. The tea cup line will have two such places to recover.

Re Edgeware Road: I thought the bay platforms were South of the through platforms! Roll Eyes So it looks like quite a few conflcits here...
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page