Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:35 27 Apr 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

No 'On This Day' events reported for 27th Apr

Train RunningCancelled
16:52 Paignton to London Paddington
17:28 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
17:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
18:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
18:11 Castle Cary to Swindon
19:35 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
19:43 Swindon to Westbury
20:00 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:17 Taunton to Bristol Temple Meads
21:00 Bristol Temple Meads to Avonmouth
21:28 Avonmouth to Bristol Temple Meads
22:35 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
Short Run
16:36 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:25 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
17:59 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
18:00 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
18:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
18:58 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
19:59 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
20:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
21:10 Portsmouth Harbour to Bristol Temple Meads
22:30 Cardiff Central to Westbury
23:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
15:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
17:30 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
17:51 Paignton to Exmouth
18:10 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 27, 2025, 18:46:15 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[100] Solar panels between the rails in Switzerland
[70] Taplow-Hassocks
[60] BBC TV Licensing - ongoing discussion
[54] Penryn to Melksham - summary and some pictures from 25.4.2025
[53] Photography at Saltash
[49] Driving tests - ongoing discussion
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Print  
Author Topic: Paddington Underground station  (Read 12087 times)
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10453


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: July 01, 2009, 23:34:01 »

TfL» (Transport for London - about) were running the new T Cup service at the weekend to test the timeable, however they weren't advertising the fact.  Some FGW (First Great Western) stations had signs saying for the northern half of the Circle to use the H&C station at Paddington.

www.diamondgeezer.blogspot.com  charted the experiment

The part-closure of the Piccadilly Line for engineering work meant large numbers of foreign travellers with luggage heading to the airport were turning up at Paddington which was adding to the confusion!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #31 on: July 06, 2009, 18:51:42 »

Where is the logic in this decision??

Last time I arrived at Paddington, it was straight onto the Circle Line and round to Tower Bridge which was a seemingly easy journey to take. (Outer Loop)

1) A increase in reliability across ALL sub surface lines.

2) A DOUBLING of frequency to Hammersmith - including to the new Shepherds Bush shopping centre.

You'll still be able to do that above journey - the only difference is that it'll be more reliable (and you'll wait less time for a train unless going beyond Algate).

Only disadvantage is the loss of Western side to Northern side stations. Boo hoo - either go the long way round or take the Piccadilly line!
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #32 on: July 07, 2009, 14:47:44 »


Only disadvantage is the loss of Western side to Northern side stations. Boo hoo - either go the long way round or take the Piccadilly line!


Who is going to go wrong way High Street to Baker Street? They'll all have to change?
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #33 on: July 07, 2009, 15:19:39 »

What I mean, is if the platform change at Edgware Road is too much for you, get to your destination going anticlockwise. Or by taking a alternative line.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #34 on: July 07, 2009, 15:22:00 »

Or just keep things like they are.  Tongue

However, I suspect there is a flat junction that restricts the number of trains that can run.
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #35 on: July 07, 2009, 19:54:18 »

Paddington, Victoria, Edgware Road, and Hyde Park Corner tube stations were or still are closed to a certain extent today due to flooding, according to this article - http://www.thelondonpaper.com/thelondonpaper/news/london/commuter-chaos-as-london-underground-hit-by-flooding

Mainline services from Victoria were also closed.

BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) article - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8139435.stm
« Last Edit: July 07, 2009, 20:22:48 by Lee Fletcher » Logged

Vous devez ĂȘtre impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #36 on: July 07, 2009, 21:12:37 »

Or just keep things like they are.  Tongue

You could Cool , but the reasons the sub surface lines are so unreliable are:

(a) the flat junctions, as you say

(b) the fact that the Circle line has no recovery time. The new plans will provide 2 places for Circle trains to recover, without affecting journey times or frequencies.
Logged
plymothian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 859


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: July 07, 2009, 22:19:55 »

The new T-Cup service does not eliminate the flat junctions, just (supposedly) the recovery time, as train paths still cross at Praed Street junction.  The experiments have shown that Edgware Road can get quite crowded even in relatively quiet times when there's a gap in the service.
Logged

Please be aware that only the first 4 words of this post will be platformed on this message board.
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #38 on: July 09, 2009, 11:28:09 »

I do wonder how Edware Road will cope with the number of trains. I suspect that District line services will be axed. Angry

The T-Cup does not eliminate flat junctions, but removes one from the network, and since the trains will be running more on time, the others should be less of a problem.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5346


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: July 09, 2009, 14:05:41 »

I do wonder how Edware Road will cope with the number of trains. I suspect that District line services will be axed. Angry

The T-Cup does not eliminate flat junctions, but removes one from the network, and since the trains will be running more on time, the others should be less of a problem.

There was a suggestion that some Wimbleware services would stop short at HSK, but that hasn't been the case on the trial weekends so far.

Please explain which flat junction is 'removed' - (I take it you mean no longer an issue, rather than physically removed?) - because I think the T Cup actually increases the conflicting moves over Praed St junction, west of Edgware Rd.

Paul
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #40 on: July 09, 2009, 17:19:38 »

Terminating the Wimbleware services at HSK would considerably reduce the services from HSK, NHG and Bayswater to Padd.

Terminating and reversing the Outer Circle at Edgware also increases movements over Pread Street Junction plus eliminate through HSK etc. Baker Street  and Eastward services.

A lot of people seem to catch the Inner rail circle at Baker Street who are still on the train when I get out at Padd.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #41 on: July 09, 2009, 18:44:02 »

I don't have much knowledge of Praed Street Junction. But I assumed terminating trains from the West Circle would not interfere with H&C/Cirlce trains to/from Hammersmith.

Anyway - whether or not this is the case, the fact of the matter is that there is no opportunity of recovery on the Circle line as it is. Introducing more station dwells will reduce the frequency on all sub surface lines. The T-Cup is the only viable way of increasing reliability.

And there is the extra trains on the Hammersmith branch - also serving the new shopping centre.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #42 on: July 09, 2009, 18:48:49 »

Btline, I thought you were obsessed with removing slack yet are supporting adding of it?

This is of course likely to lead to slack running!  Huh
Logged
plymothian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 859


View Profile
« Reply #43 on: July 09, 2009, 21:41:30 »

Terminating outer circle and district trains have to cross the paths of Hammersmith bound trains as the through platforms will be the outer two faces at Edgware Road.  This provides cross platform interchange for westbound on circles, but a having to use the bridge for circle services eastbound.  Likewise arriving on the district involves using the bridge.  Of course, passengers from Hammersmith bound services could cross platform to the District to go to to Paddington and beyond, changing at HSK. 
Currently Edgware Road's passenger information, and size is woefully inadequate for what will be such a major interchange.
Logged

Please be aware that only the first 4 words of this post will be platformed on this message board.
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #44 on: July 09, 2009, 22:22:51 »

Btline, I thought you were obsessed with removing slack yet are supporting adding of it?

Am I? Quote a section where I support adding slack. Huh

A key to a punctual railway is good turn around time. The current Circle line, by definaition, has no such time. The tea cup line will have two such places to recover.

Re Edgeware Road: I thought the bay platforms were South of the through platforms! Roll Eyes So it looks like quite a few conflcits here...
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page