Btline
|
|
« Reply #30 on: May 23, 2009, 17:30:59 » |
|
For VT▸ : Miltion Keynes (peak) and Watford Junction (all day).
For SN: Wembley Central (all day) Southbound only
For SWT▸ : Clapham Junction and Woking
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mookiemoo
|
|
« Reply #31 on: May 23, 2009, 20:25:51 » |
|
Ah yes - but VT▸ operate a long distance IC▸ service - FGW▸ are trying to be all things to all men
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."
"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
|
|
|
Zoe
|
|
« Reply #32 on: May 23, 2009, 21:44:29 » |
|
The Cornish Riviera used to be non-stop Paddingon to Exeter. The up Golden Hind used to be non-stop Taunton to Paddington.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #33 on: May 23, 2009, 21:59:57 » |
|
There wouldn't be any point now, as it would only catch up the 1000 Paddington - Paignton at Reading!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mookiemoo
|
|
« Reply #34 on: May 24, 2009, 00:15:06 » |
|
I actually think the merger of wessex and thames trains with FGW▸ was a mistake.
As one company - if there are problems with one area of the franchise, there is incentive to patch it from a different area. They are three different modes of operation - and FGW are becoming a jack of all trades and master of none.
1. The local commuter services are over crowded and the stopping patters are some what bizarre - e.g. Maidenhead gets fast PAD» services in the peak but slough doesnt?
2. The long distance services are running at a detriment due to supporting the commuter and local services
3. The local services are timed more to fit into the overall network than serving local needs.
Yes they run to time - but then the 1922 to hereford has 12 minutes make up time at great malvern - because they cant guarantee it running to time.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."
"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
|
|
|
|
Boppy
|
|
« Reply #36 on: May 26, 2009, 15:25:22 » |
|
Does this rule apply for the 17:06 train as well? Reason I ask is that sometimes I buy the odd Off-Peak ticket between Reading and Paddington and last Friday I caught this train with my friends from Paddington to Reading specifically for two reasons: - The "Which train from Paddington" boards near the gates that say what Off-Peak services back show that this is one of the few semi-fast (stops at Twyford) trains that you can get back to Reading Off-Peak
- I checked with a member of staff at the station and they stated we should catch this train back to Reading
I guess maybe after what has been stated here I shouldn't get this train anymore to Reading - if that's the case does someone need to update those Off-Peak notice boards near the gates?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #37 on: May 26, 2009, 15:34:53 » |
|
1706 is valid as Penzance trains go at 03 during the peak.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tim
|
|
« Reply #38 on: May 26, 2009, 16:02:35 » |
|
Not a bad idea. I think a few people on this board are getting bogged down in arguments about the policability and enforceability of punative fares. Regardless of that issue, it will not be advertised (at Paddington or online) as stopping at Reading, so fewer people will board it and more seats will be available for longer distance passengers.
I can't get too excited if a few people make illegal journeys on the train and fail to get caught (it is not as if they are getting away without buying a ticket), and I suspect FGW▸ isn't too woried about this point either.
Ask yourself, even if there was no issue about ticket validity (imagine you had an all line rover in your pocket), would you feel happy about getting on a train to Reading when the platform indicators did not include "Reading" as a destination and where the train only a few minutes behind did show "Reading"? I suspect that more people will be scared off boarding by the peceived possibility that the train will not stop at Reading at all and they will have a long detour than they will about a penalty fare issue (which most people will not understand).
but so long as it only applies to journeys where there is genuine overcrowding, it is a pretty good idea.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #39 on: May 26, 2009, 19:57:12 » |
|
I quite agree, Tim. Though I would add that it should only apply on trains where there is severe overcrowding and there's plenty of capacity on neighbouring services that depart at very similar times. The Penzance services are probably unique in that respect as departures on a summer Friday are busy all day.
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #40 on: June 04, 2009, 21:26:44 » |
|
Just had another look, and it appears its only on Fridays that they are pick up only at Reading or Bank Holidays.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cereal_basher
|
|
« Reply #41 on: June 05, 2009, 17:26:52 » |
|
Are they, my full timetable suggest pick up only all the time.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vacman
|
|
« Reply #42 on: June 11, 2009, 19:19:33 » |
|
Easy solution, don't stop at Reading at all! Whats the point on the 1206 as it's usually full at Padd, same goes for the 1000 Pnz-Padd, it may as well go fast from Plymouth to Padd as it's usually full by Camborne, if you can't fit anyone else on then why stop???
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #43 on: June 11, 2009, 19:30:48 » |
|
To let people off? Reading is a large connection station.
Many people will have seat reservations.
Despite my clear views on having faster InterCity trains, I believe all trains should stop at Reading.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tim
|
|
« Reply #44 on: June 15, 2009, 13:48:02 » |
|
To let people off? Reading is a large connection station.
Reading is large enough to merit a stop. I follow vacman's logic but taken to its obvious extreme, no trains would stop anywhere and there would then always be plenty of spare seats. making it "pick up only" is fine. It removes a service from London-Reading commuters, but they already have a great service so the change has minimum impact. Removing the Reading call completely would be a mistake because you are seriously damaging the customer servcie and undermining the connectivity of the Network. Folk from Reading have just as much right to a direct fast Cornish service as Londoners.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|