ellendune
|
|
« Reply #420 on: April 26, 2014, 19:44:31 » |
|
Having just booked seats in First Class on both East Midlands Trains an XC▸ , I am disappointed not to be able to choose forward or reverse facing (something which has not been possible for several years) but I was faced with 'Window' 'Window View' (whatever that means) and 'Aisle'. On XC I have ended up with Aisle anyway and will be even more annoyed if I am made to face the rear of the train having forked out for the First Class.
I'm posting this here, because the layouts indicated above suggest ranks of single seats facing in one direction - in itself not a problem - but I hope FGW▸ will maintain the customer-friendly practice of allowing choice of which way the seat faces. It makes a difference to me as I suffer travel sickness at high speed when not facing the destination.
XC presumable don't do it because of the number of reversals at Birmingham. You did not say where you are going, but with Derby to Reading there is always a reversal at Birmingham, with Derby to Bristol there is mostly a reversal at Birmingham depending on the route taken between Kings Norton and New Street. So you might have a forward facing seat for only part of the journey. Also the changes mean that XC are not always the same way round, like the FGW HST▸ 's. It depends on the journey they have done before. It is just too difficult to work out which way round the train would be even if there was not a reversal during the journey.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
trainer
|
|
« Reply #421 on: April 26, 2014, 22:14:19 » |
|
Thanks ellendune. I know why XC▸ say they do (don't) do it, but FGW▸ also reverse at Bristol TM‡ on the Cardiff-Portsmouth service and still offer an option which can be worked out as the direction depends on where the train starts. Just to complete the picture I wanted to go from Bristol to Leeds which has no reversal normally.
I accept that I am probably in a small, uncommercially significant minority.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ellendune
|
|
« Reply #422 on: April 26, 2014, 22:21:24 » |
|
Thanks ellendune. I know why XC▸ say they do (don't) do it, but FGW▸ also reverse at Bristol TM‡ on the Cardiff-Portsmouth service and still offer an option which can be worked out as the direction depends on where the train starts. Just to complete the picture I wanted to go from Bristol to Leeds which has no reversal normally.
I accept that I am probably in a small, uncommercially significant minority.
Bristol Leeds does sometimes reverse if the train takes the Camp Hill route between New Street and Kings Norton. This maintains route knowledge so that XC trains can bypass New Street in the event of a problem. It also avoids delays due to stopping services via the University. It is this irregularity that leads to the problem. The Portsmouth Cardiff trains always reverse at Bristol.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Southern Stag
|
|
« Reply #423 on: April 27, 2014, 00:00:52 » |
|
The biggest problem is that even if a service doesn't reverse en route, because of the nature of the XC▸ network the service could turn up with the First Class carriage at either end of the train and therefore internally either way round. Unlike FGW▸ HSTs▸ which have both xF and xB seats in First Class XC have individually numbered seats and in First Class on Voyagers there is a significant bias towards seats facing in one direction. (Back to travel in leading, facing to travel if trailing.) There is no way for XC to accurately offer Forwards or Back seats.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Timmer
|
|
« Reply #424 on: April 27, 2014, 07:13:56 » |
|
I accept that I am probably in a small, uncommercially significant minority.
I can't travel in reverse direction of travel without feeling a bit queasy are a while so you aren't alone. One of the reasons why I go via London when heading North rather than using XC▸ .
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bobm
|
|
« Reply #425 on: April 27, 2014, 07:28:01 » |
|
I accept that I am probably in a small, uncommercially significant minority.
I can't travel in reverse direction of travel without feeling a bit queasy are a while so you aren't alone. One of the reasons why I go via London when heading North rather than using XC▸ . I have no idea on figures clearly, but I travel with several people who prefer to sit facing and for them it is an important consideration when making the journey. Thankfully I can sit facing in either direction and in someways I quite like sitting with my back in the direction of travel so I can see items of interest as they disappear in the distance. Our varied preferences do cause some amusement at places like Gloucester where our group of four all get up and play musical chairs before the train reverses!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rhydgaled
|
|
« Reply #426 on: April 27, 2014, 11:21:29 » |
|
Pretty sure ATW▸ offer direction on their reservations, despite nearly all their long-distance routes including at least one reversal. When I had my first class breakfast trip from Chester to Cardiff though my reservation was in a backwards-facing seat, despite me asking for forward-facing. I guess the system didn't account for the reversal at Chester. I accept that I am probably in a small, uncommercially significant minority.
I can't travel in reverse direction of travel without feeling a bit queasy are a while so you aren't alone. One of the reasons why I go via London when heading North rather than using XC▸ . I have no idea on figures clearly, but I travel with several people who prefer to sit facing and for them it is an important consideration when making the journey. Thankfully I can sit facing in either direction and in someways I quite like sitting with my back in the direction of travel so I can see items of interest as they disappear in the distance. Our varied preferences do cause some amusement at places like Gloucester where our group of four all get up and play musical chairs before the train reverses! I play 'musical chairs' at both Carmarthen and Swansea on occassion, to keep facing forwards. When I am forced to travel backwards, I don't feel unwell it just feels odd.
|
|
|
Logged
|
---------------------------- Don't DOO▸ it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
|
|
|
didcotdean
|
|
« Reply #427 on: April 27, 2014, 16:21:38 » |
|
I always travel backwards (and you'd know why if you've had the misfortune to be in a high speed crash). However, I appreciate others with motion sickness can't comfortably do this - my mother for one.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
thetrout
|
|
« Reply #428 on: April 27, 2014, 17:42:39 » |
|
I've seen a 'mockup' document of what First Class will [or should] look like come the changes. I was given the opportunity to see it as a Staff Member knows I use First Class often and thought I would be interested. I had to rush to catch a train so didn't get to see the whole document, But as a summary this is what it contained: HST▸ Formation for Micro Buffet: 43 - TGS - TS - TSD - TS - TS - TSMB - TC‡ - TF - 43HST Formation for Full Size Buffet: 43 - TGS - TS - TSD - TS - TS - TS - TFRB - TF - 43- 43 = Power Car (The Locomotive)
- TGS = Trailer Guard Standard Class (Coach A with Train Managers Office and Bicycle Loading)
- TSD = Trailer Standard Class Disabled (Coach C with Disabled Wheelchair Spaces and Accessible Toilet)
- TSMB = Trailer Standard Class with Micro Buffet
- TFRB = Trailer First Class with Buffet & Kicthen
- TC = Trailer Composite (Mix of First and Standard Class)
- TF = Trailer First Class
On the Micro Buffet sets. There will be half a carriage of Standard Class between the Buffet and First Class. In First Class itself: - A selection of Individual Airline Seats with fixed Table.
- Glass Privacy Screen between tables for 4 Seats; Extending to cover just the seats closest to the window. Slightly pointless IMHO▸ but does make it look somewhat smart
- Seats have 'pointy ears' headrests which I believe would be to allow you to rest your head against if you wanted to dose
- Refresh of toilets in First Class (Practically no difference to the current layout and continued use of those awful rotating towels to dry your hands)
- New seating colour
- New Curtains at the windows
- POSSIBLE realignment of Power Sockets - The document was Black and White so difficult to ascertain
- POSSIBLE reinstatement of Toilet at the end of Coach H (Currently a Trolley Store Room and Water Boiler) - Document implied it was Coach H as the carriage interchange doors were closed, suggesting it to be behind the power car
All in all it does look quite a smart little layout. My only gripes is that it doesn't make clear if there will be a Wheelchair Space in First Class or a Disabled Toilet either. I'm also wondering why the chose to put the Micro Buffet next to the TC. Why not make the Micro Buffet a TCMB (Trailer Composite Micro Buffet) as this would allow another full Standard Class carriage?!?! Ok you wouldn't get too much Standard Class seating in a TCMB but it would be at the provision of a further full Standard Class carriage (Possibly made from the conversion of a TF to a TS) It almost certainly looks like there will be no Quiet Carriage either. I'll try and get another nose at the document next time I'm at the station that allowed me to see it Edit: Having only just spotted broadgage' post below which he pointed out there were 2+9 Carriages in one of the formations. I have edited this accordingly as this was not correct. Both Micro Buffet or Full Buffet sets should be 2+8
|
|
« Last Edit: May 29, 2014, 17:01:50 by thetrout »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
thetrout
|
|
« Reply #429 on: April 27, 2014, 17:53:42 » |
|
I always travel backwards (and you'd know why if you've had the misfortune to be in a high speed crash). However, I appreciate others with motion sickness can't comfortably do this - my mother for one.
Agreed. I prefer to travel backwards if I can As a side discussion I always feel nervous about using a bathroom onboard a moving Coach (i.e. National Express, Berrys Superfast, Megabus, First Greyhound etc) if the toilet faces the direction of travel. There are a select few coaches that have the toilet so you're backwards or side on to the direction of travel... If anyone has used a coach toilet facing the direction of travel; and had the experience where the coach has had to brake violently will understand my concerns...!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #430 on: April 27, 2014, 18:04:57 » |
|
Agreed. I prefer to travel backwards if I can You're just determined to be awkward, young trout! I've seen a 'mockup' document of what First Class will [or should] look like come the changes. I was given the opportunity to see it as a Staff Member knows I use First Class often and thought I would be interested. I had to rush to catch a train so didn't get to see the whole document, But as a summary this is what it contained ...
Many thanks for posting such a comprehensive summary, and from such a brief glimpse, thetrout! My only concern, though, is over this: Seats have 'pointy ears' headrests which I believe would be to allow you to rest your head against if you wanted to dose
I'd advise against the administering of any substances on board a train - it's clearly not right.
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
thetrout
|
|
« Reply #431 on: April 27, 2014, 18:41:47 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
broadgage
|
|
« Reply #432 on: April 27, 2014, 19:00:20 » |
|
The first formation listed by the famous Trout would seem to be 2+9 , I thought the intention was to keep the same total number of vehicles, but downgrade first class provision.
|
|
|
Logged
|
A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard. It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc. A 5 car DMU▸ is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
|
|
|
Rhydgaled
|
|
« Reply #433 on: April 27, 2014, 19:12:07 » |
|
As a side discussion I always feel nervous about using a bathroom onboard a moving Coach (i.e. National Express, Berrys Superfast, Megabus, First Greyhound etc) if the toilet faces the direction of travel. Having seldom traveled by coach (never comfortably, normally too little legroom and once as a 'stowaway' on the steps outside the toilet on a rail-replacement bus) I cannot see how one can use a toilet at all onboard a moving coach. In my experience, coaches have seat belts and (unlike buses) do not allow standing passengers. The latter is evidenced by lack of grab rails for standees to hold onto and I think once or twice I've noticed a sign giving a number of seated passengers and "nil standees". Given that the law says seat belts, if fitted, must be fastened while the vehicle is moving, just how is one supposed to make it to and from the toilet? And without grab-rails, how many have fallen down the steps?
|
|
|
Logged
|
---------------------------- Don't DOO▸ it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #434 on: April 27, 2014, 19:36:31 » |
|
So if there are some individual seats, how many First Class seats are FGW▸ losing per set? It can't be that many now, which makes me feel a little better about the changes (but still against overall).
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|