Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:15 08 Jan 2025
 
* Mother 'not surprised' son killed on London bus
- Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger that diverted flight
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
tomorrow - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
8th Jan (1991)
Cannon Street buffer stop collision (link)

Train RunningCancelled
19:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:05 Liskeard to Looe
20:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:53 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
23:20 Exmouth to Exeter St Davids
09/01/25 05:57 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 06:30 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 07:20 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 07:54 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 08:30 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 09:05 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 09:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 10:08 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 10:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 11:06 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 11:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 12:08 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
18:38 Barnstaple to Exmouth
20:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
21:39 Paignton to Exmouth
Delayed
17:52 Trowbridge to Great Malvern
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 08, 2025, 20:28:15 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[174] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[82] Views sought : how train companies give assistance to disabled...
[69] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[54] senior railcard
[52] Coastal walks - station to station
[28] Rail Replacement bus - OK, but I prefer the train.
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 68
  Print  
Author Topic: FGW 1st Class - ongoing discussion of the benefits and their apparent reduction  (Read 430968 times)
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13028


View Profile Email
« Reply #300 on: March 14, 2014, 13:47:02 »

More info....

Quote
On 35 of our High Speed Trains we will be taking a first class carriage and converting it into a standard class carriage with 80 standard class seats. In addition to the extra seats, we have listened to customer feedback and these carriages will also have more 4-person tables. The other 18 High Speed Trains will have a first class carriage converted into a composite carriage, half standard and half first, with the saloons fully divided with a door.

.....re-covered leather seats.....LED lighting....Catering will not be affected as a result of the investment; both the first class at seat trolley service and a buffet car service will continue to be offered  and our very popular Pullman dining services will continue....All the work to convert the carriages and to refresh the first class environment will be done in the UK (United Kingdom) , with the work to the first class carriages being undertaken at our depot in Laira, Plymouth and the reseating work being undertaken in Scotland

Our programme to fit Wi-Fi to all these trains is unaffected. The first services with Wi-Fi will operate from June and by December of this year all our high speed trains should be offering the free service to both standard and first class customers.

snap!
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #301 on: March 14, 2014, 14:22:49 »

The converted coaches will have 8 4-person tables....

How are they going to get 80 seats, with 32 around tables, in these converted coaches? Current low density carriages, with 4 tables, only manage 80 seats.

Are the toilets/trolley store/luggage racks coming out of the former 1st Class carriages to make the extra room?
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13028


View Profile Email
« Reply #302 on: March 14, 2014, 14:53:15 »

Or high-density, god-forbid?

Toilet removal wouldn't cause too much hassle though...
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #303 on: March 14, 2014, 15:11:03 »

All high density means is there are 2 tables as opposed to 4. Still only gives you a total seating capacity of 84.

I can't see how's it's possible to have a carriage with 80 seats, 32 of which will be around 8 tables. Unless toilets/trolley stores are removed and luggage racks reduced.
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #304 on: March 14, 2014, 16:02:11 »

Is the consensus now that all the modified trains will still have one and a half coaches of first class seating, with some of the half coaches being the full buffets, and the rest being 50/50 first and standard?

So there'll be no trains which only have one first class coach?

Paul
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13028


View Profile Email
« Reply #305 on: March 14, 2014, 16:38:18 »

Correct. As stated in FGW (First Great Western) releases today
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6551


View Profile
« Reply #306 on: March 14, 2014, 16:54:36 »

How are they going to manage to provide the Pullman service with less First Class seating as they currently use part of coach G as well as the section of First next to the buffet on peak services. Going to leave very little seating for those not dining?
Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10166



View Profile
« Reply #307 on: March 14, 2014, 17:09:12 »

I was wondering that, and what about the quiet coach?
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10362


View Profile
« Reply #308 on: March 14, 2014, 21:56:12 »

As ever, I'll wait to see the refresh in the flesh before I comment too much, though welcome that FGW (First Great Western) has apparently listened to criticism that there are too few tables on HST (High Speed Train) sets and are putting eight more in the additional carriage.  That might not be enough for some of course, but goes some small way to redressing the balance which should be an appropriate ratio between seats at tables and airline seats - the original refresh went too far down the airline route in my opinion, which is why I'm pleased that tables are making an appropriate return in this refresh and also in the likely IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) seating layouts.

We'll see how the reduction in first class seating goes down with the passengers, as the press release says, on the vast majority of trains accommodation will be more than adequate still, but there will be a few services that pose a problem - that's the problem with the same train having to be both a long distance leisure train and a commuter express in one.  Heaven forbid that first class passengers have to share a table of four with someone else  Wink
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Network SouthEast
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 492



View Profile
« Reply #309 on: March 14, 2014, 22:58:43 »

The term bus seating is inappropriate to apply to HSTs (High Speed Train).

Bus seating = low back rest, no arm rests, no pull down tables. Like the Northern Rail class 142s that appeared on FGW (First Great Western) routes for a short while.

Airline seating = high back rest, arm rests, pull down tables. Just like HSTs.

As usual, I'm with IndustryInsider on this. Let's actually wait to see what the first refreshed coach looks like before passing judgement.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19083


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #310 on: March 21, 2014, 01:13:59 »

From the Slough Express:

Quote
Slough MP supports more seats on train plans



Plans to expand the number of standard class seats on First Great Western trains have been supported by Fiona Mactaggart.

The operator has agreed with the Department for Transport (DfT» (Department for Transport - about)) to create almost 3,000 more standard class seats a day for customers across its network by introducing the changes to all of its high speed trains.

The Slough MP said: "Like other passengers on the busy route I feel very frustrated when I am forced to stand squashed up against other people in a train where there are a number of empty first class carriages. I'm glad that the DFT (Department for Transport) and First Great Western have listened to commuters who experience poor rail services every day. There is still a way to go to improve rail services overall, but this is a good step in the right direction."

The first completed carriages are expected to be running in June, with the entire fleet due to be completed by late summer 2015.
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13028


View Profile Email
« Reply #311 on: March 21, 2014, 10:16:58 »

yeah, right. Don't MPs (Member of Parliament) get 1st class priviledges?
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #312 on: March 21, 2014, 10:25:19 »

yeah, right. Don't MPs (Member of Parliament) get 1st class priviledges?

Not any more, hence the conspiracy theory that it is the MPs along the route who are behind the decision...

Paul
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13028


View Profile Email
« Reply #313 on: March 21, 2014, 10:30:15 »

Yes, her & Mrs May in particular....
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5632



View Profile
« Reply #314 on: March 21, 2014, 16:32:39 »

yeah, right. Don't MPs (Member of Parliament) get 1st class priviledges?

Not any more, hence the conspiracy theory that it is the MPs along the route who are behind the decision...

Paul

Agree, I think that MPs should be allowed first class, not because they deserve it, but to stop this sort of thing.

I bet that if MPs were allowed First, that it would soon become "a vital service for local employers, that should be protected"
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 68
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page