Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:35 10 Jan 2025
 
- Two million discounted tickets up for grabs in rail sale
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 14/01/25 - Rail Sale starts
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
10th Jan (2017)
Defibrillators discussion pack published by Network Rail (link)

Train RunningCancelled
23:03 Salisbury to Portsmouth & Southsea
23:14 London Paddington to Oxford
Short Run
22:50 Salisbury to Portsmouth Harbour
Delayed
19:04 London Paddington to Penzance
20:20 Carmarthen to Bristol Parkway
23:42 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 23:45:37 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[109] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[96] Westminster Hall debate : Railway services to South West
[59] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[53] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[49] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[38] GWR Advance Purchase sale - January 2025
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
Author Topic: Adieu Adelante  (Read 10760 times)
ReWind
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 343


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: March 28, 2009, 18:33:13 »

They could have been put to use Cardiff-Portsmouth ? The existing 3 car 158s are getting a bit full even during the day now, and if you are over 5' 8", not very comfortable either !
[/quote]

I do believe that the Cardiff-Portsmouth 3 car 158's are going to be replaced with a turbo 17x series by 2011.  FGW (First Great Western) are in process of releasing the 3 car 158's off the Pompey's
Logged

Here, there and Everywhere!!
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: March 28, 2009, 19:58:01 »

Quote
They could have been put to use Cardiff-Portsmouth ? The existing 3 car 158s are getting a bit full even during the day now, and if you are over 5' 8", not very comfortable either !

I do believe that the Cardiff-Portsmouth 3 car 158's are going to be replaced with a turbo 17x series by 2011.  FGW (First Great Western) are in process of releasing the 3 car 158's off the Pompey's

Adelantes would have been wasted on the Cardiff - Portsmouth, not a fast enough route, which is why they are all going to the ECML (East Coast Main Line) as 125 mph services. (Northern's current temporary use doesn't count really).

It will be interesting to see if Roger Ford's 11 x 4 car for Cardiff - Portsmouth comes to fruition - although it could well be a turbostar variant if Bombardier win, there are other rolling stock manufacturers...   Smiley 

Anyway, I think 'FGW are in process of releasing...' is a tad premature at this stage?

Paul
Logged
ReWind
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 343


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: March 28, 2009, 21:12:16 »

I had a chat with Malcolm Chapman, who is a route director for the western region of FGW (First Great Western), and a personal friend of mine, and the Cardiff - Portsmouth topic came up in our conversation.

FGW are planning to bring in 4 car class 17x turbo trains for this route, and also to Brighton.  This is planned to commence in 2011.  You are correct in saying the the Adelante's are inadequate for this route.  Many factors attribute to this including linespeeds which do not exceed 90mph and track circuit problems on the Up and Down Netley lines.

Apparentley FGW are using Bombardier to build these units, which will be commencing shortly.  The 3 car 158 units will then be reverted back to 2 car 158 units and used for the Gloucester/Great Malvern runs and the Weymouth runs along with the odd BTM (Bristol Temple Meads (strictly, it should be BRI))-Penzance runs FGW have.

This is from a FGW director, not from me, so please don't taunt me if any of this info will appear to be incorrect now, or in the future!!!  Wink Tongue
Logged

Here, there and Everywhere!!
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: March 28, 2009, 21:44:27 »

Apparentley FGW (First Great Western) are using Bombardier to build these units, which will be commencing shortly. 

I suppose they may have been tipped off, the announcement of the selected builder is due sometime this month according to the ITT (Invitation to Tender), and there are only two working days left... Smiley

Paul
Logged
smithy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: March 28, 2009, 21:50:14 »

I had a chat with Malcolm Chapman, who is a route director for the western region of FGW (First Great Western), and a personal friend of mine, and the Cardiff - Portsmouth topic came up in our conversation.

FGW are planning to bring in 4 car class 17x turbo trains for this route, and also to Brighton.  This is planned to commence in 2011.  You are correct in saying the the Adelante's are inadequate for this route.  Many factors attribute to this including linespeeds which do not exceed 90mph and track circuit problems on the Up and Down Netley lines.

Apparentley FGW are using Bombardier to build these units, which will be commencing shortly.  The 3 car 158 units will then be reverted back to 2 car 158 units and used for the Gloucester/Great Malvern runs and the Weymouth runs along with the odd BTM (Bristol Temple Meads (strictly, it should be BRI))-Penzance runs FGW have.

This is from a FGW director, not from me, so please don't taunt me if any of this info will appear to be incorrect now, or in the future!!!  Wink Tongue

i have also heard FGW are to get 11x4 cars for pompey route although as yet the winning bidder has not been announced,this decision is up to the government and not FGW as they are the ones placing the order.
having said that bombardier is the obvious choice as they are making turbostars already so no retraining/retooling will be required just adding on to the existing production line,also it would keep british workers in jobs.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: March 28, 2009, 23:34:46 »

Of course the LM (London Midland - recent franchise)/LO/CH 172s are being held up, so don't hold your breath for the next order being completed by 2011! Wink
Logged
r james
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 223


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: March 30, 2009, 01:28:40 »

What happened to the fire damaged unit? Was this repaired,or is this still awaiting action?
Logged
dog box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 653


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: March 30, 2009, 18:08:10 »

it was repaired and in use with fgw recently think it was 105
Logged

All postings reflect my own personal views and opinions and are not intended to be, nor should be taken as official statements of first great western or first group policy
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: March 30, 2009, 23:43:46 »

Well, we did get our promised HST (High Speed Train) on the 17.51 tonight.

Now maybe they can turn their attention to reinstating one on the 08.52 from Malvern, which today was a lovely draughty three-car 165 - not exactly the inter-city quality and comfort FGW (First Great Western) promised us in 2004.
Logged
super tm
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 599


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: March 31, 2009, 10:21:51 »

Well, we did get our promised HST (High Speed Train) on the 17.51 tonight.

Now maybe they can turn their attention to reinstating one on the 08.52 from Malvern, which today was a lovely draughty three-car 165 - not exactly the inter-city quality and comfort FGW (First Great Western) promised us in 2004.

I am afraid that this is booked to be a 166 (noted your comment about 165 today)  until the may timetable change.  What happens after that I dont know
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: March 31, 2009, 15:15:48 »

Have the last 3 units definitely been returned off-lease as of this week?

Presumably then the only debate now is which livery of NXEC (National Express East Coast), HT (Hull Trains), GC» (Great Central Railway - link to heritage line), GN etc they'll next appear in... Undecided

Paul
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #26 on: March 31, 2009, 22:57:24 »

it was repaired and in use with fgw recently think it was 105

You're dead right, the high-speed mobile barbecue was 105, remember seeing pictures of it looking sorry for itself in the railway press. Can anyone remember which bouncy castle it was that spontaneously combusted near Nailsea a few years back?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bristol/3754902.stm

Did that ever return to traffic or was it a write-off because all the plastic melted?  Cheesy
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #27 on: March 31, 2009, 23:47:49 »

I was on the first off peak train of the day to London today and it was a turbo. Angry

This is a disgrace. First they move the first off peak train to run half an hour later (perhaps unavoidable), then they give us a Turbo!

Do they want leisure travellers? Their website did not warn people, and the PISs (Passenger Information System) at Worcester said it was an HST (High Speed Train). Due to the slack, we only arrived a few minutes late - but this is unacceptable.

FGW (First Great Western) need the 180s unless HST availability improves. Which bright spark thought that a single HST could cover for 3 180s?  Shocked
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: March 31, 2009, 23:57:26 »

Not difficult, as one set was a spare and the others did one or two runs coupled together between Oxford and London, then a couple of trips out to Malvern or Worcester separately. Last few weeks I think FGW (First Great Western) only had 102 and 109 available anyway.

In fact, I don't think the 54th HST (High Speed Train) set is due back from overhaul by Brush at Loughborough and Kilmarnock until May anyway.

Turbo on the 8.52 from Malvern was discussed a month back in Lots of train failures/short formed trains.

The CLPG» (Cotswold Line Promotion Group - about) has had a meeting with FGW about it but got no indication of any change of stance - what they were told was that some off-peak Honeybourne and Pershore HSTs stops may get cut from May to save money by cutting the fuel bills.
« Last Edit: April 01, 2009, 00:04:30 by willc » Logged
smithy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: April 01, 2009, 07:59:54 »

it was repaired and in use with fgw recently think it was 105

You're dead right, the high-speed mobile barbecue was 105, remember seeing pictures of it looking sorry for itself in the railway press. Can anyone remember which bouncy castle it was that spontaneously combusted near Nailsea a few years back?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bristol/3754902.stm

Did that ever return to traffic or was it a write-off because all the plastic melted?  Cheesy

that would be bendy bus number 613 since been scrapped,the other one that it was coupled to at the time (621 if memory serves)was saved by the driver who split them before that had a chance to go up.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page