anthony215
|
|
« Reply #105 on: January 26, 2011, 12:40:17 » |
|
I think they paln to eventually run most of the London Marylebone - Birmingham services using loco hauled stock
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #106 on: January 26, 2011, 12:42:33 » |
|
"most".....maybe a few.....to release Clubmans for the Oxford service.
I understand that they now have 40 coaches owned....but that may increase if that number don't include the released WSMR▸ coaches.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #107 on: January 26, 2011, 12:48:07 » |
|
I think they paln to eventually run most of the London Marylebone - Birmingham services using loco hauled stock
Very disappointing news, but I think that might be partly behind the decision. The Class 67's, DVT‡'s and Mk 3's could well be put to better use (revenue and capacity wise) on the London to Birmingham route post Evergreen 3 - and there's not a bottomless pit of them out there. Also, Arriva Trains Wales could inherit their paths with the long muted Aberystwyth to Marylebone service which would/could call at the same stations as WSMR▸ (save for Chirk, Ruabon and Wrexham) but utilise cheaper to operate stock and also pick up much needed custom from the central Wales stations on the way to Shrewsbury.
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #108 on: January 26, 2011, 13:07:17 » |
|
I think they paln to eventually run most of the London Marylebone - Birmingham services using loco hauled stock Very disappointing news, but I think that might be partly behind the decision. Possibly - but more likely these two facts - Adrian Shooter explained in the press release that WSMR▸ lost ^2.6million in 2010. DB» will want to see a return on their money - not a loss........and secondly, Chiltern have been told by the ORR» that WSMR were unable to carry their Banbury & Leamington pax post the May11 timetable - hence losing a share of the lucrative Rail Settlement Plan money they've been getting through the farebox, thus further exacerbating the loss. Also, Arriva Trains Wales could inherit their paths with the long muted Aberystwyth to Marylebone service which would/could call at the same stations as WSMR (save for Chirk, Ruabon and Wrexham) but utilise cheaper to operate stock and also pick up much needed custom from the central Wales stations on the way to Shrewsbury. That would again be open-access and needing to prove a case to the ORR before being allowed. DB again will need to be sure of a return on their money. In the current recession, I can't see it....
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #109 on: January 26, 2011, 13:09:33 » |
|
I see Wolmar ( WSMR▸ were originally set up in competition with Chiltern) and Crow (they should nationalise the franchise) both succeed in clouding the issues big time... Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
willc
|
|
« Reply #110 on: January 26, 2011, 13:38:37 » |
|
WSMR▸ were originally set up in competition with Chiltern No it weren't. W&S▸ was originally a partnership between Laing Rail and Renaissance Trains (also involved with Hull Trains). At the time, Laing owned Chiltern, before DB» bought the rail operation, inclusing the W&S stake from Laing.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #111 on: January 26, 2011, 13:39:02 » |
|
That would again be open-access and needing to prove a case to the ORR» before being allowed. DB» again will need to be sure of a return on their money. In the current recession, I can't see it....
Would it be open-access? ATW▸ are a franchised operator - surely it would just need approval from the ORR in an 'extention to their current franchise map' way. Much like Virgin's Wrexham extension of a couple of years ago, or EMT» 's daily service from Lincoln?
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #112 on: January 26, 2011, 13:45:09 » |
|
WSMR▸ were originally set up in competition with Chiltern No it weren't. W&S▸ was originally a partnership between Laing Rail and Renaissance Trains (also involved with Hull Trains). At the time, Laing owned Chiltern, before DB» bought the rail operation, inclusing the W&S stake from Laing. That's exactly what I was getting at - Wolmar talking through his hat again... Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #113 on: January 26, 2011, 14:11:00 » |
|
That would again be open-access and needing to prove a case to the ORR» before being allowed. DB» again will need to be sure of a return on their money. In the current recession, I can't see it....
Would it be open-access? ATW▸ are a franchised operator - surely it would just need approval from the ORR in an 'extention to their current franchise map' way. Much like Virgin's Wrexham extension of a couple of years ago, or EMT» 's daily service from Lincoln? Yes, it would as they would be competing for business with franchisees (unless it cut out stops completely away from other franchees routes, including Chiltern)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
anthony215
|
|
« Reply #114 on: January 26, 2011, 14:25:44 » |
|
I dont really mind arriva running services to london from Aberystwyth as long as they don't use teh class 158's. Another problems is that the DVT‡ & class 67's would have to be fitted with ETRM'S for use on the cambrian line.
I wouldn't mind a loco hauled service on the cambrian route with some Aberystwyth - Birmingham services being extended to London.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #115 on: January 26, 2011, 14:28:10 » |
|
You'll get the 158s if anything, as ATW▸ originally applied for. No need to spend money when you don't have to.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
welshman
|
|
« Reply #116 on: January 26, 2011, 19:36:06 » |
|
I refer to my post of 5th November. Don't forget that ATW▸ is subsidised by WAG» , who are keen on Aberystwyth - London. Without W & S there's less of an issue about revenue abstraction and ATW could run non-stop from Birmingham anyway. The ORR» acknowledged that there were no performance or capacity issues in relation to the application when they rejected it on 1/3/10. The concluding paragraph says:- We have assessed the business case put forward by ATW and remain concerned about the financial viability of the proposed new service. To generate a profit we consider there would be two options open to ATW: either to generate additional revenue; or to increase revenue abstraction. As discussed above, we consider it extremely unlikely that ATW would be able to generate sufficient new revenue to cover its forecast operating costs. In order to do this ATW would need to achieve a generation to abstraction ratio far in excess of that we have seen with other open access services, or case studies from the wider transport market . We therefore consider that the only way that ATW would be able to generate sufficient revenue to cover its additional operating costs would be to pursue a more abstractive pricing and marketing strategy than its business plan assumes. Even without pursuing such a policy, we consider that ATW^s proposed service would have a generation to abstraction ratio towards the lower end of that which we have previously approved. Pursing an aggressive abstraction policy sufficient for ATW to cover its additional operating costs would therefore reduce the generation to abstraction ratio to well below that where we have previously approved applications. In other words, ATW could only make money if their optimistic projections are right or if they nick all the W & S passengers...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #117 on: January 27, 2011, 11:29:11 » |
|
But WSMR▸ can't make a profit (read loss of ^2.6million last year), then ATW▸ will struggle to cover that sum *and* make a profit. Don't forget ATW & WSMR are stablemates & DB» just pulled the plug on one.....would they want another subsiduary to take over thje same route & some as an open-access op? I have my doubts, but we'll see.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #118 on: January 27, 2011, 11:44:48 » |
|
I agree with you, Chris - though a more streamlined operation, using much cheaper Class 158's and established staff from a large pool, none of the catering frills which must have cost an awful lot - along with ditching the very dubious bit of WSMR▸ 's route between Wrexham and Shrewsbury for the more lucrative bit from Aberystwyth which already loads a 4-car 158 quite well, and I could see that ^2.6m being altered quite significantly. Perhaps not enough to make money, but as you say, we'll see whether anything comes of it.
I personally think that ATW▸ would be better off concentrating on getting the Aberystwyth to Shrewbury/Brum service up to an hourly frequency first which has been talked about for ages now.
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #119 on: January 27, 2011, 11:51:40 » |
|
Agree wholeheartedly with that.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|