Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:35 15 Jan 2025
 
- Three arrests after boy, 14, killed on London bus
- Trainee gas engineer, 20, wins £7.5m in lottery
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/01/25 - TLRS AGM, Taunton
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
15th Jan (2015)
RoSCo Eversholt changes hands (link)

Train RunningCancelled
23:50 Maidenhead to Marlow
Short Run
23:22 Gatwick Airport to Reading
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 15, 2025, 23:49:23 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[305] Train departed 3 minutes earlier than scheduled
[119] Changing content of the domain home page as the new Coffee Sho...
[49] Newcomers start here ... and a reference for older hands
[30] England's Best Loved Lost Railway: The Somerset & Dorset Joint...
[28] North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025
[25] Eastern Airways to start Southend - Newquay service
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 11
  Print  
Author Topic: Wrexham & Shropshire - their rise and fall (merged topic)  (Read 39825 times)
anthony215
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1299


View Profile Email
« Reply #105 on: January 26, 2011, 12:40:17 »

I think they paln to eventually  run most of the London Marylebone - Birmingham services using loco hauled stock
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13045


View Profile Email
« Reply #106 on: January 26, 2011, 12:42:33 »

"most".....maybe a few.....to release Clubmans for the Oxford service.

I understand that they now have 40 coaches owned....but that may increase if that number don't include the released WSMR (Wrexham, Shropshire and Marylebone Railway) coaches.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10371


View Profile
« Reply #107 on: January 26, 2011, 12:48:07 »

I think they paln to eventually  run most of the London Marylebone - Birmingham services using loco hauled stock

Very disappointing news, but I think that might be partly behind the decision.  The Class 67's, DVT(resolve)'s and Mk 3's could well be put to better use (revenue and capacity wise) on the London to Birmingham route post Evergreen 3 - and there's not a bottomless pit of them out there.

Also, Arriva Trains Wales could inherit their paths with the long muted Aberystwyth to Marylebone service which would/could call at the same stations as WSMR (Wrexham, Shropshire and Marylebone Railway) (save for Chirk, Ruabon and Wrexham) but utilise cheaper to operate stock and also pick up much needed custom from the central Wales stations on the way to Shrewsbury.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13045


View Profile Email
« Reply #108 on: January 26, 2011, 13:07:17 »

I think they paln to eventually  run most of the London Marylebone - Birmingham services using loco hauled stock

Very disappointing news, but I think that might be partly behind the decision.

Possibly - but more likely these two facts - Adrian Shooter explained in the press release that WSMR (Wrexham, Shropshire and Marylebone Railway) lost ^2.6million in 2010. DB» (Deutsche Bahn - German State Railway - about) will want to see a return on their money - not a loss........and secondly, Chiltern have been told by the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) that WSMR were unable to carry their Banbury & Leamington pax post the May11 timetable - hence losing a share of the lucrative Rail Settlement Plan money they've been getting through the farebox, thus further exacerbating the loss.

Quote
Also, Arriva Trains Wales could inherit their paths with the long muted Aberystwyth to Marylebone service which would/could call at the same stations as WSMR (save for Chirk, Ruabon and Wrexham) but utilise cheaper to operate stock and also pick up much needed custom from the central Wales stations on the way to Shrewsbury.

That would again be open-access and needing to prove a case to the ORR before being allowed. DB again will need to be sure of a return on their money. In the current recession, I can't see it....
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #109 on: January 26, 2011, 13:09:33 »


I see Wolmar (WSMR (Wrexham, Shropshire and Marylebone Railway) were originally set up in competition with Chiltern) and Crow (they should nationalise the franchise) both succeed in clouding the issues big time...

Paul
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #110 on: January 26, 2011, 13:38:37 »

Quote
WSMR (Wrexham, Shropshire and Marylebone Railway) were originally set up in competition with Chiltern

No it weren't. W&S (Wrexham and Shropshire (Open Access Operator)) was originally a partnership between Laing Rail and Renaissance Trains (also involved with Hull Trains). At the time, Laing owned Chiltern, before DB» (Deutsche Bahn - German State Railway - about) bought the rail operation, inclusing the W&S stake from Laing.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10371


View Profile
« Reply #111 on: January 26, 2011, 13:39:02 »

That would again be open-access and needing to prove a case to the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) before being allowed. DB» (Deutsche Bahn - German State Railway - about) again will need to be sure of a return on their money. In the current recession, I can't see it....

Would it be open-access?  ATW (Arriva Trains Wales (former TOC (Train Operating Company))) are a franchised operator - surely it would just need approval from the ORR in an 'extention to their current franchise map' way.  Much like Virgin's Wrexham extension of a couple of years ago, or EMT» (East Midlands Trains - about)'s daily service from Lincoln?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #112 on: January 26, 2011, 13:45:09 »

Quote
WSMR (Wrexham, Shropshire and Marylebone Railway) were originally set up in competition with Chiltern

No it weren't. W&S (Wrexham and Shropshire (Open Access Operator)) was originally a partnership between Laing Rail and Renaissance Trains (also involved with Hull Trains). At the time, Laing owned Chiltern, before DB» (Deutsche Bahn - German State Railway - about) bought the rail operation, inclusing the W&S stake from Laing.

That's exactly what I was getting at - Wolmar talking through his hat again...

Paul
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13045


View Profile Email
« Reply #113 on: January 26, 2011, 14:11:00 »

That would again be open-access and needing to prove a case to the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) before being allowed. DB» (Deutsche Bahn - German State Railway - about) again will need to be sure of a return on their money. In the current recession, I can't see it....

Would it be open-access?  ATW (Arriva Trains Wales (former TOC (Train Operating Company))) are a franchised operator - surely it would just need approval from the ORR in an 'extention to their current franchise map' way.  Much like Virgin's Wrexham extension of a couple of years ago, or EMT» (East Midlands Trains - about)'s daily service from Lincoln?

Yes, it would as they would be competing for business with franchisees (unless it cut out stops completely away from other franchees routes, including Chiltern)
Logged
anthony215
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1299


View Profile Email
« Reply #114 on: January 26, 2011, 14:25:44 »

I dont really mind arriva running services to london from Aberystwyth as long as they don't use teh class 158's. Another problems is that the DVT(resolve) & class 67's would have to be fitted with ETRM'S for use on the cambrian line.

I wouldn't  mind a loco hauled service on the cambrian route with some Aberystwyth - Birmingham services being extended to London.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13045


View Profile Email
« Reply #115 on: January 26, 2011, 14:28:10 »

You'll get the 158s if anything, as ATW (Arriva Trains Wales (former TOC (Train Operating Company))) originally applied for. No need to spend money when you don't have to.
Logged
welshman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 280


View Profile
« Reply #116 on: January 26, 2011, 19:36:06 »

I refer to my post of 5th November.  Don't forget that ATW (Arriva Trains Wales (former TOC (Train Operating Company))) is subsidised by WAG» (Welsh Assembly Government - about), who are keen on Aberystwyth - London.  Without W & S there's less of an issue about revenue abstraction and ATW could run non-stop from Birmingham anyway.

The ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) acknowledged that there were no performance or capacity issues in relation to the application when they rejected it on 1/3/10.  The concluding paragraph says:-

Quote
We have assessed the business case put forward by ATW and remain concerned about the financial viability of the proposed new service. To generate a profit we consider there would be two options open to ATW: either to generate additional revenue; or to increase revenue abstraction. As discussed above, we consider it extremely unlikely that ATW would be able to generate sufficient new revenue to cover its forecast operating costs. In order to do this ATW would need to achieve a generation to abstraction ratio far in excess of that we have seen with other open access services, or case studies from the wider transport market . We therefore consider that the only way that ATW would be able to generate sufficient revenue to cover its additional operating costs would be to pursue a more abstractive pricing and marketing strategy than its business plan assumes. Even without pursuing such a policy, we consider that ATW^s proposed service would have a generation to abstraction ratio towards the lower end of that which we have previously approved. Pursing an aggressive abstraction policy sufficient for ATW to cover its additional operating costs would therefore reduce the generation to abstraction ratio to well below that where we have previously approved applications.

In other words, ATW could only make money if their optimistic projections are right or if they nick all the W & S passengers...

 
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13045


View Profile Email
« Reply #117 on: January 27, 2011, 11:29:11 »

But WSMR (Wrexham, Shropshire and Marylebone Railway) can't make a profit (read loss of ^2.6million last year), then ATW (Arriva Trains Wales (former TOC (Train Operating Company))) will struggle to cover that sum *and* make a profit. Don't forget ATW & WSMR are stablemates & DB» (Deutsche Bahn - German State Railway - about) just pulled the plug on one.....would they want another subsiduary to take over thje same route & some as an open-access op? I have my doubts, but we'll see.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10371


View Profile
« Reply #118 on: January 27, 2011, 11:44:48 »

I agree with you, Chris - though a more streamlined operation, using much cheaper Class 158's and established staff from a large pool, none of the catering frills which must have cost an awful lot - along with ditching the very dubious bit of WSMR (Wrexham, Shropshire and Marylebone Railway)'s route between Wrexham and Shrewsbury for the more lucrative bit from Aberystwyth which already loads a 4-car 158 quite well, and I could see that ^2.6m being altered quite significantly.  Perhaps not enough to make money, but as you say, we'll see whether anything comes of it. 

I personally think that ATW (Arriva Trains Wales (former TOC (Train Operating Company))) would be better off concentrating on getting the Aberystwyth to Shrewbury/Brum service up to an hourly frequency first which has been talked about for ages now.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13045


View Profile Email
« Reply #119 on: January 27, 2011, 11:51:40 »

Agree wholeheartedly with that.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 11
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page