Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 17:15 10 Jan 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 14/01/25 - Rail Sale starts
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
10th Jan (1863)
Metropolitain line opened from Paddington (link)

Train RunningCancelled
13:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
14:35 London Paddington to Paignton
15:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
15:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:12 London Paddington to Bristol Parkway
16:23 London Paddington to Oxford
16:30 London Paddington to Taunton
16:32 Great Malvern to London Paddington
16:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
17:00 Oxford to London Paddington
17:18 London Paddington to Swansea
17:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Additional 18:10 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:04 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
Short Run
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:20 Carmarthen to London Paddington
14:48 London Paddington to Swansea
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
16:07 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
16:34 Newbury to London Paddington
16:50 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
17:15 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
17:20 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
17:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
18:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:38 Barnstaple to Exmouth
Delayed
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
16:13 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
16:31 Barnstaple to Exeter St Davids
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 16:57 London Paddington to Swindon
17:33 Barnstaple to Exeter Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 17:22:56 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[103] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[98] Westminster Hall debate : Railway services to South West
[97] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[87] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[41] Birthday trip, Melksham to Penzance - 28th January 2025
[22] A Beginner's Guide to the Great Western "Coffee Shop" Passenge...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Just like Melksham !  (Read 7581 times)
moonrakerz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 536



View Profile
« on: February 23, 2009, 21:19:46 »

Similar level of service, but you have to say the station itself is a bit more swish !

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail-transport/4787477/The-17million-train-station-with-only-one-service-a-day.html
Logged
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: February 23, 2009, 22:01:17 »

were not building anymore this didnt work noone used it... i bet you !!


grrrr they need to do a report into rolling stock allocation

i know that there are trains that are packed and trains that are empty and its iritating!
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43080



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: February 23, 2009, 22:11:08 »

The service is actually just a half of the TransWilts service ... but it sounds like it may be better timed as a genuine commuter train.

I note that they hope the service will increase to hourly in April - sounds about right for a town of about 50,000. Before anyone says anthing about my method of evaluation, its VERY rough - but compares sensibly / confirms the cases that we're pushing for the TransWilts.

Questions

1. If their TOC (Train Operating Company) can do it for Corby in April, why can't ours do it for Melksham ... and help Trowbridge and Westbury and Warminster and Salibury passenger who want to go to Chippenham and Swindon. 

2. Where does the line / service through Corby carry on to?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 23, 2009, 22:32:51 »

Beleive it is used for steel freight.
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 23, 2009, 22:48:09 »

It runs onto Oakham on the Leicester to Peterborough line. Curiously, the section to be used for passengers is single, whereas the freight only section is double. (Though not quite freight only, the full service shows one Melton Mowbray to St Pancras via Corby.)

My only trip from Corby when it was last open was a NSE (Network South East) "Network Day" special from Corby to Oxford. It must have been around 1989, and not long before the Bletchley to Bicester route closed. So, one part of that journey has been resurrected, roll on the second section!

 
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10365


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 23, 2009, 22:59:32 »

The station sure looks pretty swish. And hopefully in April (two months away, so hardly a ridiculous wait) the residents of Corby will be using the hourly service.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
G.Uard
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 426


"Are we at Yate yet?"


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 24, 2009, 07:57:19 »

were not building anymore this didnt work noone used it... i bet you !!





Peter Noone aka Herman of the Hermits

And there was me thinking he lived in the USA.
« Last Edit: February 28, 2009, 08:07:35 by G.Uard » Logged
Super Guard
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1308


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 24, 2009, 09:40:44 »

The station sure looks pretty swish. And hopefully in April (two months away, so hardly a ridiculous wait)

Come on, let the media get the anti-rail jungle drums out... I'm amazed I couldn't find a reference to FGW (First Great Western) being threatened with losing their franchise though?  Wink
Logged

Any opinions made on this forum are purely personal and my own.  I am in no way speaking for, or offering the views of First Great Western or First Group.

If my employer feels I have broken any aspect of the Social Media Policy, please PM me immediately, so I can rectify without delay.
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 24, 2009, 14:33:37 »

The First (a company who operate the failing TOC (Train Operating Company) FGW (First Great Western)) train departed Corby ... blah ... blah

Will get my coat Wink
Logged
bemmy
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 270



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: February 24, 2009, 14:55:21 »

I take the point about the media's stance on the railways -- I haven't seen any press reports congratulating FGW (First Great Western) on the progress made recently in our area. But I'm sorry, I fail to see what isn't scandalous about a brand new station being built and no trains being available to operate from it for several months. Stations aren't like mushrooms, they don't appear unexpectedly overnight.

This is a symptom of the wider rolling stock shortage, which was forseeable, and avoidable. Lack of money is no excuse, train leasing is a highly profitable business and clearly many TOC (Train Operating Company)'s are desperate to find new stock to lease. The blame rests with the government who micromanage all aspects of the railways, like every other matter they are ignorant about. If it is not simply a result of typical ministerial incompetence, it must be something more sinister, such as serving the interests of the banks to use a shortage to maximise their profits by keeping leasing costs sky high. Or the government being anti-rail because they serve other vested interests.

However, I'm not an expert, so maybe someone better informed than me can explain why the lack of trains at this new station is perfectly understandable and acceptable.
« Last Edit: February 24, 2009, 15:01:56 by bemmy » Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: February 24, 2009, 15:26:44 »

I take the point about the media's stance on the railways -- I haven't seen any press reports congratulating FGW (First Great Western) on the progress made recently in our area. But I'm sorry, I fail to see what isn't scandalous about a brand new station being built and no trains being available to operate from it for several months. Stations don't appear unexpectedly overnight like mushrooms.

This is a symptom of the wider rolling stock shortage, which was forseeable, and avoidable. Lack of money is no excuse, train leasing is a highly profitable business and clearly many TOC (Train Operating Company)'s are desperate to find new stock to lease. The blame rests with the government who micromanage all aspects of the railways, like every other matter they are ignorant about. If it is not simply a result of typical ministerial incompetence, it must be something more sinister, such as serving the interests of the banks to use a shortage to maximise their profits by keeping leasing costs sky high. Or the government being anti-rail because they serve other vested interests.

However, I'm not an expert, so maybe someone better informed than me can explain why the lack of trains at this new station is perfectly understandable and acceptable.

Your summary seems to answer your final question? Basically the "rail experts" at DaFT» (Department for Transport - critical sounding abbreviation I discourage - about) think it is an acceptable situation and, therefore, you don't have to understand the reasons.

Basically Corby is a victim of the Beeching et al inspired rationalisations of the railways from 1960s and onwards through the 70s. In the 60s Corby was on the direct line from Kettering to Nottingham via Melton Mowbrey. We used to catch a late afternnon train from Derby to St Pancras which was routed via Nottingham and Corby. Nottingham to Melton Mowbrey was closed (a duplicate route?) and the bridge over the Trent used as road. As traffic to the steel works came from the North the line North of Corby was left double and the line South of Corby to Kettering singled.

Also as part of the rationalisation of teh MML» (Midland Main Line. - about) the orginal 4 tracks from Bedford to Kettering (St Pancras - Kettering 72 miles was the longest stretch of 4 trck  in GB (Great Britain)) through Wellingborough were rationalised to a mixture of 4/3/2 track sections thus reducing the capacity of the line. With MML full of trains going via Leicester it is difficult to fit trains to Corby onto the line  South of Kettering.

Added to DaFTs rolling stock policy, too little too late, even if you could find the paths there isn't the stock to run the service.

Thinking about it's similar to Melksham, useful section of line closed in the North side of the traingle at Bradford on Avon plus single tracking and lack of stock to run the service. The only difference is no TOC has succeeded in running 10 trains a day that used Melksham to get,  to Corby. Although now it looks as if Corby will get a fairly decent service.

Place your bets that in the next franchise round for the MML the Corby service will be drastically reduced and the stock redeployed for an enhanced Melksham service!
 



   
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: February 24, 2009, 19:26:44 »

Added to DaFTs» (Department for Transport - critical sounding abbreviation I discourage - about) rolling stock policy, too little too late, even if you could find the paths there isn't the stock to run the service.

I reckon EMT» (East Midlands Trains - about) have done well to stick out for the 222s. It is quite clear from the EMT franchise spec [available via DfT» (Department for Transport - about) website] that DfT's original ideas for the route involved 158s running on the St Pancras - Corby service.

Of course, at the time the DfT wrote the spec they must have known every 158 was already allocated elsewhere...

Paul
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: February 24, 2009, 20:59:38 »

Also as part of the rationalisation of teh MML» (Midland Main Line. - about) the orginal 4 tracks from Bedford to Kettering (St Pancras - Kettering 72 miles was the longest stretch of 4 trck  in GB (Great Britain)) through Wellingborough were rationalised to a mixture of 4/3/2 track sections thus reducing the capacity of the line. With MML full of trains going via Leicester it is difficult to fit trains to Corby onto the line  South of Kettering.


And Network Rail is just in the process of putting back a third line on to the sole 4 mile section to be reduced to double track, between Harrowden and Kettering. Presumably the 5 tph that now run on the route make pathing of freight more difficult than the 2tph that ran when the line was rationalised in the mid eighties.
Logged
Super Guard
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1308


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: February 27, 2009, 22:22:01 »

The First (a company who operate the failing TOC (Train Operating Company) FGW (First Great Western)) train departed Corby ... blah ... blah

Will get my coat Wink

Not a bad effort  Grin
Logged

Any opinions made on this forum are purely personal and my own.  I am in no way speaking for, or offering the views of First Great Western or First Group.

If my employer feels I have broken any aspect of the Social Media Policy, please PM me immediately, so I can rectify without delay.
G.Uard
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 426


"Are we at Yate yet?"


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: February 28, 2009, 08:06:08 »

"The track is laid to the 4ft 8 1/2 inch gauge, also used by FGW (First Great Western), the failing..."
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page