Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:15 13 May 2025
 
- Macron to travel to UK for French state visit in July
- US cuts tariffs on small parcels from Chinese firms like Shein and Temu
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Melksham TUG / AGM
tomorrow - West Wiltshire RUG
17/05/25 - Summer Timetable Starts
18/05/25 - Portishead RNLI 10 anniversary

On this day
13th May (1985)
Melksham Station reopened (link)

Train RunningCancelled
09:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
16:06 Maidenhead to Bourne End
16:10 Marlow to Bourne End
16:21 Bourne End to Marlow
16:41 Marlow to Bourne End
16:52 Bourne End to Marlow
17:18 Marlow to Bourne End
17:29 Bourne End to Marlow
17:48 Marlow to Bourne End
17:59 Bourne End to Marlow
18:18 Marlow to Bourne End
18:29 Bourne End to Marlow
18:48 Marlow to Bourne End
18:59 Bourne End to Marlow
19:18 Marlow to Bourne End
19:29 Bourne End to Marlow
19:48 Marlow to Bourne End
19:58 Bourne End to Marlow
Short Run
12:12 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
12:25 Newbury to London Paddington
13:00 Marlow to Maidenhead
13:33 Maidenhead to Marlow
13:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
13:59 Marlow to Maidenhead
14:06 London Paddington to Newbury
14:33 Maidenhead to Marlow
14:59 Marlow to Maidenhead
15:38 Maidenhead to Marlow
20:08 Marlow to Maidenhead
20:38 Maidenhead to Marlow
21:04 Marlow to Maidenhead
21:38 Maidenhead to Marlow
22:04 Marlow to Maidenhead
22:37 Maidenhead to Marlow
23:03 Marlow to Maidenhead
23:50 Maidenhead to Marlow
Delayed
12:28 Plymouth to Gunnislake
13:19 Gunnislake to Plymouth
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 13, 2025, 13:17:46 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[133] Champion Reflections
[71] [otd] 13th May (1985) - Melksham Station re-opened
[53] Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
[46] Inaugural nonstop run Kings Cross to Edinburgh - 1st May 1928
[44] HS2 - Government proposals, alternative routes and general dis...
[36] Night Riviera Sleeper train - between Paddington and Penzance
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: line speeds  (Read 17855 times)
The SprinterMeister
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 665


Trundling round the SW

Chris64ex4@hotmail.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #30 on: February 17, 2009, 21:34:06 »

I was driving along the a30 lastnight when I noticed a train Exeter bound and was struggling to keep up at legal speeds? Was between Exeter and honiton

yeh but seriously anyone know

The overall line speed limit on the Southern below Salisbury is 85mph. 60mph through Honiton if routed by the main line, 25mph through the up loop line. Think there might be a differential speed limit at Gittisham heading towards Honiton which is to do with the braking distance from the Honiton up distant to the signal controlling access to the up loop. Don't know for sure as I haven't signed the Mule for years.

Logged

Trundling gently round the SW
The SprinterMeister
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 665


Trundling round the SW

Chris64ex4@hotmail.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #31 on: February 17, 2009, 21:51:23 »

the 159's started life as ordinary 158's with bsi couplings but were converted to 159's by a company in scotland,they did have 4 step braking in the early days i think as part of a trial initially and it was later put to standard 3 step.
i believe there was nothing to stop them being ran in multiple despite the 4 step although network south east preffered them not to be used with other 3 step braked units,not sure why this was the case though.
the only major difference between 159's and similar 3 car 158's like the ex-tpe stuff is the toilet retention tanks and SWT (South West Trains) have got modified driver switch and door control panels fitted now.
these days 159's can be coupled to other dmu's with compatible bsi couplings for example the 2 and 3 car 158's aquired from TPE (Trans Pennine Express).

The 159's did NOT have 4 step braking from new. Urban Mythology I'm afraid. They were built with standard 3 step braking which they still retain. Only difference as far as the brake controls are concerned is there is an emergency stop plunger on the secondmans side which is used during driver training and so forth. They were built as three car 158's, they would have been 158873-895 in the scheme of things, they have the same 400bhp Cummins as the 158863-872 batch of cl158. The interiors were delivered part fitted out, Rosyth Dockyard doing the conversion to 159 interior layout and fitting the first class section, toilet tanks etc.

The delay in fitting toilet tanks to the 159/1's was due to the engineering drawings for the original tanks being mislaid when Rosyth changed hands, a spare tank at Salisbury was cut up and measurements taken in order to obtain the tanks for the 159/1's.

There were thoughts about re-engineing the 159/1's to take the 400bhp Cummins although it doesn't in fact show any performance advantage over the 350bhp Cummins used on the FGW (First Great Western) ones. The step up gears within the transmission have a different ratio which has the effect of keeping the 400 Cummins below its rated BHP. As there is more involved than swapping the engines (The transmission, rads and oil cooler have to be changed as well) I doubt this will happen.
Logged

Trundling gently round the SW
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #32 on: February 17, 2009, 22:06:03 »

I was driving along the a30 lastnight when I noticed a train Exeter bound and was struggling to keep up at legal speeds? Was between Exeter and honiton

yeh but seriously anyone know

The overall line speed limit on the Southern below Salisbury is 85mph. 60mph through Honiton if routed by the main line, 25mph through the up loop line. Think there might be a differential speed limit at Gittisham heading towards Honiton which is to do with the braking distance from the Honiton up distant to the signal controlling access to the up loop. Don't know for sure as I haven't signed the Mule for years.



thankyou, so basically i wasnt the only one slightly over the speed lim?.. a descrepancy which i resolved asap of corse
Logged
G.Uard
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 426


"Are we at Yate yet?"


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: February 18, 2009, 06:55:41 »

I won't take up space in quoting all of TSM (Track Section Manager)'s reply ref 4 step braking from above, but I am pleased to see this issue laid to rest.  Urban myth it may be, but a very widely believed one.  Even that constant source of information Roll Eyes Wikipedia, seems to think that 4 step braking was fitted on conversion from 158-159/0.  Thanks to TSM and smithy.
Logged
smithy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: February 18, 2009, 08:15:23 »

TSM (Track Section Manager) may well be correct but i have it on good authority that in early days 159's did trial a 1 bar pressure increase in emergency much like turbostars in essence giving it a 4th step,the trial was later removed and they were reverted back to standard 3 step.
Logged
The SprinterMeister
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 665


Trundling round the SW

Chris64ex4@hotmail.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #35 on: February 26, 2009, 09:35:57 »

TSM (Track Section Manager) may well be correct but i have it on good authority that in early days 159's did trial a 1 bar pressure increase in emergency much like turbostars in essence giving it a 4th step,the trial was later removed and they were reverted back to standard 3 step.


They never had enhanced brake pressure in emergency either. It should be remembered that Exeter men signed them when they were new. The work all went to Salisbury / Waterloo when the shadow SWT (South West Trains) franchise was created.

It might be they have enhanced emergency braking now, I will ask a SWT Sarum driver when I see one to ask.
Logged

Trundling gently round the SW
onthecushions
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 979


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: February 26, 2009, 22:35:55 »


Diverting a little, I've noticed on HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) journeys into Paddington, on occasion the train paces aircraft coming into land at Heathrow. Sometimes the train even gains on the planes. Headwinds perhaps?

OTC
Logged
G.Uard
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 426


"Are we at Yate yet?"


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: February 27, 2009, 09:25:03 »

According to Air New Zealand, the landing speed for a Boeing 747-400,
one of the newer long-range versions, the landing speed is 200 km/h or
124 mph.  This is the landing configuration with full flaps and slats
deployed, which slow the aircraft significantly over its "clean"
landing speed.  So possibly.  Cheesy

Air New Zealand
"Aircraft Statistics"
http://www.airnz.co.nz/aboutus/resourcecentre/aircraft_statistics.htm

The Boeing 767-300 and 767-200 both land at 240 Km/h or 149 mph:  Only a 143 could keep up with one of those.  Grin
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page