Timmer
|
|
« Reply #45 on: February 15, 2009, 07:25:07 » |
|
There is a chance that because these trains are being built by Hitachi they might not be too bad. The other group bidding to win the IEP▸ contract included Bombardier which gave the UK▸ rail network...yes you've guessed it Voyagers!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dog box
|
|
« Reply #46 on: February 15, 2009, 08:20:35 » |
|
but Timmer built to what old beardie wanted.........with all due respect the 170 is not a bad bit of kit and Bombardier built that
|
|
|
Logged
|
All postings reflect my own personal views and opinions and are not intended to be, nor should be taken as official statements of first great western or first group policy
|
|
|
Electric train
|
|
« Reply #47 on: February 15, 2009, 08:37:22 » |
|
The other thing that may have steered DfT» choice is the work load of manufactures, there is a big orders planned and or ongoing for Thameslink, London Overground, London Underground and other ex BR▸ suburban and rural fleet renewals and enhancements
|
|
|
Logged
|
Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
|
|
|
Zoe
|
|
« Reply #48 on: February 15, 2009, 08:48:13 » |
|
UK▸ rail network
Why do people insist on using this term? The UK has two quite separate rail networks: The National Rail network of Great Britain and the Northern Ireland network.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Electric train
|
|
« Reply #49 on: February 15, 2009, 10:56:34 » |
|
UK▸ rail network
Why do people insist on using this term? The UK has two quite separate rail networks: The National Rail network of Great Britain and the Northern Ireland network. There are actually more than that London Underground, the Glasgow "clockwork oranage" Tyne and Weir metro ......
|
|
|
Logged
|
Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #50 on: February 15, 2009, 12:56:32 » |
|
It's a bit of a concern that the Paddington to Plymouth/Penzance route is only an optional extra and not part of the main order as this leaves the possibility that we could end up with Voyager style underfloor engine DMUs▸ on that route.
Indeed, Zo^: from the BBC» , A Cornwall MP▸ is calling on the government to re-think plans for a fleet of new trains for the Great Western and East Coast main lines. The Department for Transport has given the go-ahead for the ^7bn funding to replace trains 20-30 years old. However, Matthew Taylor, Truro and St Austell MP, says south west England will not benefit enough as the trains will only come as far as Bristol. He has branded the lack of inclusion "calamitous" and wants a re-think.
TravelWatch SouthWest, the public transport passenger watchdog for the region, plans to campaign for more "super express" trains to be built to replace existing high speed trains on other key corridors in the south west of England. The organisation will focus particularly on routes serving Cheltenham Spa, Exeter, Gloucester, Penzance, Plymouth and Taunton.
Chris Irwin, chair of TravelWatch SouthWest, said: "TravelWatch SouthWest will continue to campaign vigorously for the build of additional new super express trains for deployment on other key routes in the region. We will also campaign for the early electrification of the Great Western Main Line and for additional diesel rolling stock to alleviate the terrible overcrowding happening every day on regional and local trains in the South West''.
See http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/devon/7887086.stm
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #51 on: February 15, 2009, 13:07:06 » |
|
Is there any serious reason though why none of these could be produced for XC▸ ? Im sure a few could be used to supplement the fleet?
IEP▸ for XC is definitely in the ITT▸ , as one of the future phases. The recent announcement only seems to cover phase 1, ECML▸ and GWML▸ AFAICT▸ . I guess they'll hang fire on XC until they know what can be cascaded (eg Meridians) depending on if there is any electrification? ECML HSTs▸ > EMT» / MML» , Meridian > XC, then later IEPs to EMT/MML is another option... Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
r james
|
|
« Reply #52 on: February 18, 2009, 23:10:52 » |
|
Yeah, I personally would rather see all of the meridians being transferred to XC▸ , as I have said many times before, it would create a more uniform fleet os train interiors and standards etc.
The longer Meridians would be perfect for XC.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
broadgage
|
|
« Reply #53 on: March 04, 2009, 17:13:26 » |
|
It is begining to look as though this may not be such good news for passengers According to Rail* the new trains will be in formations of 5 or 10 vehicles, so thats mainly 5 vehicle formations then ! With a few 10s. No mention is made is made of different designs of power car for different train lengths, so presumably either the 5 car ones will be very overpowered or the 10 car ones underpowered. It does not look as though the 5 car ones will use only a single power car, since no mention is made of driving trailers. It would also appear that they count the power cars in the number of vehicles which is a bit misleading since the diesel power cars will have no seating, and the electric ones only limited seating. Thats like calling the present HSTs▸ 10 car trains. Seating layout will presumably be high density bus seats, like all new trains The inclusion of a small diesel generator in the electric trains certainly sounds like a good idea, able to run the A/C or proceed at much reduced speed when the wires come down, as they will ! And at least the diesel version will have two power cars for "get you home redundancy" like the HSTs. * issue 612, page 6
|
|
|
Logged
|
A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard. It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc. A 5 car DMU▸ is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #54 on: March 05, 2009, 13:58:00 » |
|
According to Rail* the new trains will be in formations of 5 or 10 vehicles, so thats mainly 5 vehicle formations then ! With a few 10s. No mention is made is made of different designs of power car for different train lengths, so presumably either the 5 car ones will be very overpowered or the 10 car ones underpowered. It does not look as though the 5 car ones will use only a single power car, since no mention is made of driving trailers. ...and the electric ones only limited seating. Seating layout will presumably be high density bus seats, like all new trains The actual numbers of 10 and 5 car units is given precisely (in terms of daily diagrams required) in the DfT» 's ITT▸ . It certainly isn't mostly 5s with a few 10s. The 10 car diesel has 2 power cars. There is no 5 car diesel only variant. The 5 car bi-mode has a single diesel power car as shown in Hitachi's brief. The electric driving car of the bi-mode (it is not a driving trailer) has about 60 odd seats using Hitachi's seating capacity figures. Seating layout is covered in detail in the Train Technical Specification, on DfT's site, which is a bit too detailed to summarise, however the ratios of airline to table seating are all in there for the three types of train, intercity, interurban, and commuter. As an example, the intercity standard class has 50/50 airline and table. Achieved total seat numbers and seating pitches are in the Hitachi spec. DfT ITT: http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/iep/iepinvitationtotender/iepinvitationtotender.pdfDfT Train Technical Specification: http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/iep/iepinvitationtotender/ieptraintechnicalspecifi.pdfHitachi info sheet: http://www.agilitytrains.com/assets/pdf/AT-090205-Key_Facts-Released-1_5.pdfHope this helps you find some of the facts... Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
broadgage
|
|
« Reply #55 on: March 05, 2009, 14:43:51 » |
|
Thanks for the above links, which I have only viewed briefly as yet.
Whilst I find your information somwhat re-assuring, I have seen so many new trains introduced that have been shorter, with reduced legroom and primarily bus seats that I have become somwhat cynical.
I note with concern the statement that the interior layout can be altered to meet the needs of TOCs▸ , I cant imagine that FGW▸ would make any positive changes ! After all, complaints about lack of seats are allways understood to mean that customers want high density bus seating. And of course there is still time de-spec or simplify the trains "lets only build the interurban variant" for example.
Whilst we may hope that the new trains will have a proper restaurant, it does not look very likely, probably wont even have a buffet if other new trains are anything to go by!.
|
|
|
Logged
|
A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard. It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc. A 5 car DMU▸ is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
|
|
|
Not from Brighton
|
|
« Reply #56 on: March 05, 2009, 23:53:55 » |
|
The Hitachi info sheet certainly seems to suggest that the self powered variety will indeed have only eight passenger coaches. I cant see how any more could be added at a later date without magically getting more power from somewhere.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
G.Uard
|
|
« Reply #57 on: March 06, 2009, 08:45:20 » |
|
If the wires ever do get to red soil country, I can't see them penetrating west of Exeter. I am told that current loadings west of Newbury on the B&H▸ are not exactly encouraging, other than at peaks and given the apparent intent to confine electrification to the M4 corridor, a long term diesel IEP▸ option is perhaps the best the south-west can hope for, at least before 2020.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #58 on: March 06, 2009, 16:12:29 » |
|
If the wires ever do get to red soil country, I can't see them penetrating west of Exeter. I am told that current loadings west of Newbury on the B&H▸ are not exactly encouraging, other than at peaks and given the apparent intent to confine electrification to the M4 corridor, a long term diesel IEP▸ option is perhaps the best the south-west can hope for, at least before 2020.
Funny that, don't think I have EVER been on a lightly loaded train towards London (and this is at Newton Abbot)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tim
|
|
« Reply #59 on: March 06, 2009, 16:25:15 » |
|
The Hitachi info sheet certainly seems to suggest that the self powered variety will indeed have only eight passenger coaches. I cant see how any more could be added at a later date without magically getting more power from somewhere.
Oh dear, Why are new trains always too short. The basic economic principle behind trains which has been true for 175 years is that longer trains cost less to operate per passenger. If you are only carrying a few dozen people you can probably do it cheaper in a bus. I don't see how you can say that there is insufficient demand for travel to justify an upgrade when demand is artifically surpressed by high fares on every intercity route
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|