Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:15 10 Jan 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025
28/01/25 - Coffee Shop 18th Birthday

On this day
10th Jan (1863)
Metropolitain line opened from Paddington (link)

Train RunningCancelled
08:23 London Paddington to Oxford
08:36 Redhill to Reading
09:00 Oxford to London Paddington
09:59 Oxford to London Paddington
Short Run
08:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
08:34 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
Delayed
06:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
07:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 09:24:17 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[84] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[74] Thumpers for Dummies
[56] Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025
[55] Railcard Prices going up
[46] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[45] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7
  Print  
Author Topic: Lots of train failures/short formed trains  (Read 21227 times)
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #75 on: February 25, 2009, 19:43:54 »

Quote
Nor do they have long left, take a trip down to Lymington whilst you can...

South West Trains axe is falling...

What is the likelihood of this. Angry

Quite high actually Wink
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #76 on: February 25, 2009, 19:44:40 »

 Cry
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #77 on: February 25, 2009, 19:46:31 »

Not to worry.

4CIG 1881 is being restored to full mainline working order not too far from Lymington Wink
Logged
thetrout
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2612



View Profile
« Reply #78 on: February 25, 2009, 19:50:14 »

As Mk 1s have separate underframes, I believe that there exists concern that body and frame could shear off, as at Clapham.  I am also pretty sure that the Mk 1s used by railtour companys have to have a non passenger carrying vehicle at either end of the train, preferably not another Mk1.  Lack of central door locking is also an issue.

You are 100% Spot On G.Uard Grin

With regards to the central door locking, either has to be fitted or an attendant at each vestibule with an exterior door.
Logged

Grin Grin Grin Grin
IanL
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 348


View Profile
« Reply #79 on: February 27, 2009, 14:39:47 »

Yesterday, Malvern to Paddington, Adelante forming the 1631 from Oxford was cancelled due to train failure. It was stationary at p1 Oxford with lots of announcements before crawling away into sidings.
Logged
BBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 643


View Profile
« Reply #80 on: February 27, 2009, 19:23:37 »

Tonight at Paddington the departure of 17:15 to Swansea was announced as delayed due to mechanical problems. I see from Live Departure Boards that it eventually left at 17:44 and is now currently running 54 minutes late from Swindon. It looks like the 17:45 to Carmarthen has overtaken it!

I caught the 17:36 PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains)-OXF» (Oxford - next trains) Turbo (a 5-car 165 formation instead of a 6-car 166) in Platform 9 which was opposite the 17:30 to Taunton via Bristol TM(resolve) in 8. The HST (High Speed Train) was still there with concerned looking FGW (First Great Western) staff standing by it when we departed 2 minutes late at 17:38 but according to LDB it left shortly afterwards at 17:41.

According to FGW Live Updates the 18:00 to Bristol TM has been cancelled due to a train fault.

Not a good day again for FGW!
Logged
Ollie
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2308


View Profile
« Reply #81 on: February 28, 2009, 12:33:50 »

Tonight at Paddington the departure of 17:15 to Swansea was announced as delayed due to mechanical problems. I see from Live Departure Boards that it eventually left at 17:44 and is now currently running 54 minutes late from Swindon. It looks like the 17:45 to Carmarthen has overtaken it!

I caught the 17:36 PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains)-OXF» (Oxford - next trains) Turbo (a 5-car 165 formation instead of a 6-car 166) in Platform 9 which was opposite the 17:30 to Taunton via Bristol TM(resolve) in 8. The HST (High Speed Train) was still there with concerned looking FGW (First Great Western) staff standing by it when we departed 2 minutes late at 17:38 but according to LDB it left shortly afterwards at 17:41.

According to FGW Live Updates the 18:00 to Bristol TM has been cancelled due to a train fault.

Not a good day again for FGW!

Was a bad day indeed.
It was the 17:48 Cheltenham that had the fault, and the set for the 18:00 was used on the 17:48 (which ended up leaving about 15 late) and the 18:00 as you say was cancelled.
Logged
G.Uard
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 426


"Are we at Yate yet?"


View Profile
« Reply #82 on: February 28, 2009, 17:24:44 »

I have a week's annual leave and look what happens. Roll Eyes

Oh heck, I have to go back tomorrow. Sad
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #83 on: March 02, 2009, 23:14:22 »

And the best-laid substitution plans continue to go awry. Today's 8.52 from Malvern to London was a three-car 165 - how long before it's a two-car? No sooner had the conductor announced there would be a slight delay opening the doors at Oxford due to coupling on to another set than he was back on announcing that there wasn't an extra set today. Glad I got off as there were lots of people waiting to board at Oxford. Still, it's not half-term any more, so who cares...
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #84 on: March 05, 2009, 00:36:07 »

Following is a reply to an email I sent to FGW (First Great Western) customer services about the extra Turbos:

"I can imagine your dismay at the change we have made to the type of train we provide to run our 09:50 service from Moreton-in-Marsh, especially the impact this had during half-term week. A considerable amount of research has been done to make sure that the capacity of a Turbo is able to cope with the average number of passengers who will use this service but of course we will of course continue to monitor this.

"I know you will remain disappointed but I hope you will come to understand our position".

No, I won't understand their position, especially when the loading in half-term and any other school holiday period is well above average, leading to the overcrowding and lousy travel experience for both regular passengers and the families on days out who FGW surely want to encourage to keep on using their trains in future. The bit of my email about this aspect of the situation was studiously ignored. They just don't seem to get it, do they?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43075



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #85 on: March 05, 2009, 05:36:37 »

Following is a reply to an email I sent to FGW (First Great Western) customer services about the extra Turbos:

"A considerable amount of research has been done to make sure that the capacity of a Turbo is able to cope with the average number of passengers who will use this service ....

Let's say that a fifty seater bus is provided from M to B and it loads with 40 people on Thursday and with 60 people on Friday.   "Considerable research" will tell you that it IS able to cope with the average number of people - 50.   But looking at the people travelling, you'll notice that 60% of them - well over a half - will have had a journey on a service that was unable to cope, and won't exactly be singing the praises of the bus operator!

Is this reply from Customer Services just flannel, or is it an honest admission that it's an accepted company policy to run trains that don't have the capacity to properly cope with the customers who wish to travel on up to half the days?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
IanL
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 348


View Profile
« Reply #86 on: March 05, 2009, 09:15:02 »

I have had similar replies from FGW (First Great Western) customer services in response to a similar question. Lots of unhappy passengers from Charlbury/Hanborough especialy during half term week, but also yesterday (mid week during term time) when it was standing room only. Some of whom were paying for 1st class seats but told there were only 12 1st class seats so sorry, find yourself another one.
Logged
super tm
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 599


View Profile
« Reply #87 on: March 05, 2009, 12:07:05 »

Following is a reply to an email I sent to FGW (First Great Western) customer services about the extra Turbos:

"I can imagine your dismay at the change we have made to the type of train we provide to run our 09:50 service from Moreton-in-Marsh, especially the impact this had during half-term week. A considerable amount of research has been done to make sure that the capacity of a Turbo is able to cope with the average number of passengers who will use this service but of course we will of course continue to monitor this.

"I know you will remain disappointed but I hope you will come to understand our position".

No, I won't understand their position, especially when the loading in half-term and any other school holiday period is well above average, leading to the overcrowding and lousy travel experience for both regular passengers and the families on days out who FGW surely want to encourage to keep on using their trains in future. The bit of my email about this aspect of the situation was studiously ignored. They just don't seem to get it, do they?

Why dont you ask them if they could make off-peak tickets valid on the previous train to ease the load on this one.  Part of the problem is that this is the first off peak train so will always be busy.  I like to see what their response would be !!!!
Logged
IanL
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 348


View Profile
« Reply #88 on: March 05, 2009, 12:25:05 »

When I started on this route, off peak tickets were allowed on the 0842 to Paddington (now the 0835) but they were not allowed on the same train if you boarded at oxford. I think this was discontinued from approx 2004 when Thames were replaced by FGWLink.

The 0835 is already very overcrowded because they have delayed the first off peak train thereby moving customers from the offpeak to the peak! So no hope there I am sure.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #89 on: March 05, 2009, 16:33:59 »



No, I won't understand their position, especially when the loading in half-term and any other school holiday period is well above average, leading to the overcrowding and lousy travel experience for both regular passengers and the families on days out who FGW (First Great Western) surely want to encourage to keep on using their trains in future. The bit of my email about this aspect of the situation was studiously ignored. They just don't seem to get it, do they?

Erm, is half term isolated to the Cotswolds line only?

As it so happened, the Cotswolds is the only line where turbos are able to be used. I travelled on a packed HST (High Speed Train) in Devon during half term, and if this was a turbo the overcrowding would have been astronomical. Clearly FGW is simply acting on what they can do. Which is not a lot!
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page