Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
 Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:35 04 May 2025
 
- Netanyahu vows response after Houthi missile hits near Israel's main airport
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]		 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
4th May (2017)
First WECA Mayor elected (*)
Train RunningCancelled
18:09 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
04/05/25 18:58 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:24 Swansea to London Paddington
20:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
20:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
20:43 London Paddington to Swansea
21:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
21:30 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
23:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
18:25 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
19:25 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
20:07 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
20:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
21:09 Portsmouth Harbour to Bristol Temple Meads
22:30 Cardiff Central to Westbury
05/05/25 00:35 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
Delayed
18:02 London Paddington to Penzance
19:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
19:43 London Paddington to Swansea
Additional 21:08 Taunton to Exeter St Davids
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 21:30 Bristol Temple Meads to Bristol Parkway
•
PollsOpen and recent polls
Open to 08/05 09:07 Steam Excursion - or diesel excursion with a featured steam section?
Open to 07/05 09:27 Should train, bus and coach operators be required to accept cash
•
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
•
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
•
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
•
Train companiesSelect from:
GWR
SWR
XC
Chiltern
TfL
TfW
WMR
Southern
• Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple Meads • Bath Spa • Chippenham • Swindon • Didcot Parkway • Reading • London Paddington • Melksham
Exeter St Davids • Taunton • Westbury • Trowbridge • Bristol Parkway • Cardiff Central • Oxford • Cheltenham Spa • Birmingham New Street
May 04, 2025, 21:38:04 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[172] Closure of Bridport branch
[82] Taplow-Hassocks
[73] Walk to Pilning and return by train - 3rd May 2025
[56] BBC TV Licensing - ongoing discussion
[28] Subtle train time changes
[26] Pilning Station - where are we, and looking at future options ...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Great Western Coffee Shop > All across the Great Western territory > Smoke and Mirrors > Franchising financing
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »
  Print  
Author Topic: Franchising financing  (Read 18886 times)
welshman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 282


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: January 22, 2009, 19:26:22 »
It's not all about economics.  The last set of figures I saw showed that about half ATW▸ (Arriva Trains Wales (former Train Operating Company))'s income is subsidy from WAG» (Welsh Assembly Government - about) and the rest comes from fares.  A considerable proportion of the services are run as a "social railway" since there would otherwise be no public transport at all.  Or at least no coherent public transport.

Take the Heart of Wales line for example.  5 trains a day from Swansea to Shrewsbury.  Essential but not economic.  Or the Cambrian Coast line, which is effectively the school bus.

I have no idea who regularly travels from Maesteg to Cheltenham.
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: January 22, 2009, 21:38:57 »
I doubt anyone does, but it must be operationally more efficient to run a through service than have to terminate trains from both directions at a station which is very congested.



 
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: January 22, 2009, 23:14:46 »
I don't suppose there's a huge number of takers for the through journey on the two-hourly Manchester Picc - Milford Haven service either but there are so many significant traffic flows en route that this train makes perfect sense.
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: January 29, 2009, 00:45:26 »
Looks like National Express could be head of the queue to hand back the keys to the Government.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/jan/28/national-express-rail-contract
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: February 02, 2009, 16:05:07 »
The only loss would be their website. Sad
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: February 02, 2009, 16:18:13 »
Apart from the fact that National Express had nothing to do with the design of it...
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19311



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: February 04, 2009, 09:17:06 »
Quote from: willc on January 29, 2009, 00:45:26
Looks like National Express could be head of the queue to hand back the keys to the Government.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/jan/28/national-express-rail-contract


Prehaps the drastic cut in their restaurant provision is just the the thin end of the wedge (Only 15 trains per day on NXEC▸ (National Express East Coast) and none on NXEA▸ (National Express East Anglia)). We may see other 'rationalisation' wherever TOCs▸ (Train Operating Company) can get away with it, without upsetting DfT» (Department for Transport - about). Most current franchises were struck during a period of economic growth, with growing passenger numbers. Subsequently TOCs were climbing all over each other to offer DfT the biggest premium. I suspect when the first TOC gets into financial trouble it will go running, teary-eyed, to DfT and Hoon and Co will supinely allow it to alter it's franchise terms.
Logged
"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: February 04, 2009, 11:08:26 »
Quote from: bignosemac on February 04, 2009, 09:17:06
Quote from: willc on January 29, 2009, 00:45:26
Looks like National Express could be head of the queue to hand back the keys to the Government.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/jan/28/national-express-rail-contract


Prehaps the drastic cut in their restaurant provision is just the the thin end of the wedge (Only 15 trains per day on NXEC▸ (National Express East Coast) and none on NXEA▸ (National Express East Anglia)). We may see other 'rationalisation' wherever TOCs▸ (Train Operating Company) can get away with it, without upsetting DfT» (Department for Transport - about). Most current franchises were struck during a period of economic growth, with growing passenger numbers. Subsequently TOCs were climbing all over each other to offer DfT the biggest premium. I suspect when the first TOC gets into financial trouble it will go running, teary-eyed, to DfT and Hoon and Co will supinely allow it to alter it's franchise terms.

Has already happened.  The franchise said at least 87 restaurants (GNER▸ (Great North Eastern Railways) has 90+)
Logged
super tm
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 599


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: February 04, 2009, 11:19:02 »
Quote from: Tim on February 04, 2009, 11:08:26
Quote from: bignosemac on February 04, 2009, 09:17:06
Quote from: willc on January 29, 2009, 00:45:26
Looks like National Express could be head of the queue to hand back the keys to the Government.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/jan/28/national-express-rail-contract


Prehaps the drastic cut in their restaurant provision is just the the thin end of the wedge (Only 15 trains per day on NXEC▸ (National Express East Coast) and none on NXEA▸ (National Express East Anglia)). We may see other 'rationalisation' wherever TOCs▸ (Train Operating Company) can get away with it, without upsetting DfT» (Department for Transport - about). Most current franchises were struck during a period of economic growth, with growing passenger numbers. Subsequently TOCs were climbing all over each other to offer DfT the biggest premium. I suspect when the first TOC gets into financial trouble it will go running, teary-eyed, to DfT and Hoon and Co will supinely allow it to alter it's franchise terms.

Has already happened.  The franchise said at least 87 restaurants (GNER▸ (Great North Eastern Railways) has 90+)

I think the 87 restaurants quote is correct in that when it was announced it said that there would be 87 restaurants a day. However it turns out that this was NOT actually a franchise commitment leaving the option for NXEC to reduce them at any time in the future as they have done so.

As always the devil is in the detail.
Logged
super tm
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 599


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: February 04, 2009, 11:49:12 »
And here is the specification on the DaFT» (Department for Transport - critical sounding abbreviation I discourage - about) website:-

Catering
It will be for bidders to propose an appropriate level of catering provision for passenger services. Bidders will be made aware of stakeholder preferences.


So basically it can be anything they like !!!
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #25 on: February 08, 2009, 17:01:31 »
Quote from: devon_metro on February 02, 2009, 16:18:13
Apart from the fact that National Express had nothing to do with the design of it...

Whoever designed it; it'll be lost (unless First Group/Chiltern/Govia buy it).
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: February 17, 2009, 14:24:19 »
thanks for putting me right.  The devil is always in the detail
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of page • Jump to Forum Home Page