Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:15 13 May 2025
 
- Macron to travel to UK for French state visit in July
- US cuts tariffs on small parcels from Chinese firms like Shein and Temu
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Melksham TUG / AGM
tomorrow - West Wiltshire RUG
17/05/25 - Summer Timetable Starts
18/05/25 - Portishead RNLI 10 anniversary

On this day
13th May (1985)
Melksham Station reopened (link)

Train RunningCancelled
09:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
12:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
13:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
14:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
16:06 Maidenhead to Bourne End
16:10 Marlow to Bourne End
16:21 Bourne End to Marlow
16:41 Marlow to Bourne End
16:52 Bourne End to Marlow
17:18 Marlow to Bourne End
17:29 Bourne End to Marlow
17:48 Marlow to Bourne End
17:59 Bourne End to Marlow
18:18 Marlow to Bourne End
18:29 Bourne End to Marlow
18:48 Marlow to Bourne End
18:59 Bourne End to Marlow
19:18 Marlow to Bourne End
19:29 Bourne End to Marlow
19:48 Marlow to Bourne End
19:58 Bourne End to Marlow
Short Run
12:12 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
12:25 Newbury to London Paddington
13:00 Marlow to Maidenhead
13:33 Maidenhead to Marlow
13:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
13:59 Marlow to Maidenhead
14:06 London Paddington to Newbury
14:33 Maidenhead to Marlow
14:59 Marlow to Maidenhead
15:38 Maidenhead to Marlow
20:08 Marlow to Maidenhead
20:38 Maidenhead to Marlow
21:04 Marlow to Maidenhead
21:38 Maidenhead to Marlow
22:04 Marlow to Maidenhead
22:37 Maidenhead to Marlow
23:03 Marlow to Maidenhead
23:50 Maidenhead to Marlow
Delayed
13:19 Gunnislake to Plymouth
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 13, 2025, 13:28:48 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[133] Champion Reflections
[71] [otd] 13th May (1985) - Melksham Station re-opened
[53] Go-Op Cooperative - proposals for additional rail services
[46] Inaugural nonstop run Kings Cross to Edinburgh - 1st May 1928
[44] HS2 - Government proposals, alternative routes and general dis...
[36] Night Riviera Sleeper train - between Paddington and Penzance
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: Crossrail - Improving capacity at the Western End  (Read 19258 times)
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #30 on: April 19, 2009, 20:59:15 »

It was on the council's plans.

Until they realised they had been out-bid. Angry

What Worcester really needs is a 3 or 4 platformed Foregate Street (re-named Central) station - 2 HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) length through platorms with 1 or 2 East facing bays, long enough for 3 car DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit). Shrub Hill could then close and all trains extended to Foregate.

That land where they built flats recently could have been used to provide a multi-storey car park for passengers!

A shame that there is no vision today.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10464


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: April 20, 2009, 09:06:43 »

A nice idea in principle, though when you factor in the elevated nature of the tracks (a good 30 feet above street level) and the viaduct that starts immediately the platforms end, and surely such a vision would have been prohibitively expensive?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #32 on: April 20, 2009, 21:25:38 »

Viaduct is west of the station. The extra bays would be east facing.

It would be expensive - but it is needed. Worcester's main railway station is in-adequate.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10464


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: April 21, 2009, 09:08:44 »

Well it ain't gonna happen mate. Two full length platforms and two bays would cost the earth given the nature of the stations location. Much better would be to re-do the signalling to create a metro style station with proper bi-directional signalling and much reduced headways, then rebuild Shrub Hill (where there's ample sensible land available), or close Shrub Hill and build a parkway station near the M5 in the Norton Junction area.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4536


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: April 21, 2009, 16:51:29 »

I doubt even the most optimistic railwayman could expect Crossrail to reach as far west as Worcester especially as even Reading being slightly optimistic ......

and back on topic  Tongue  Grin
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #35 on: April 21, 2009, 20:00:56 »

Well it ain't gonna happen mate. Two full length platforms and two bays would cost the earth given the nature of the stations location. Much better would be to re-do the signalling to create a metro style station with proper bi-directional signalling and much reduced headways, then rebuild Shrub Hill (where there's ample sensible land available), or close Shrub Hill and build a parkway station near the M5 in the Norton Junction area.

The other problem would be that the line would have to close while the works are going on - too problematic!

I agree - new bi-directional signalling, reduced headways, an extra few sets of points to allow FULL platform flexibility and a new Parkway station.

I doubt even the most optimistic railwayman could expect Crossrail to reach as far west as Worcester especially as even Reading being slightly optimistic ......

and back on topic  Tongue  Grin

Sorry, my rants about Tesco have pulled this thread over 100 miles off route (although Crossrail to Worcester would be better than the current arrangement!)

Hmmmm: 10 tph (trains per hour) to Worcester? (all express of course!) Tongue Grin
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: April 22, 2009, 00:00:30 »

And Evesham has a Co-op where the old Midland station was (oh and a ghastly Tesco nearby - at least it's not over the railway).

Not quite, but it is on the site of the railway goods yard!
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page