It is such a shame how we, the British - once world leaders, are now tiny in the rail industry.
The start was the
APT▸ . Privatisation has killed the remainder.
All those skills lost....
Agree. Unfortunatately the so called "failure" of the
ATP▸ gave an anti rail government the excuse they needed to reduce investment in rail especialy new rolling stock. Privatisation finished the job.
Rumour has it that Derby (
BR▸ Reasearch) were very near to sorting out the ATP when the plug was pulled.
The major problem with the ATP seems to be that there were too many new technologies built into the train. Not only tilt but also hydrostatic brakes etc. This always causes problems.
Had they put tilt in one and brakes in another then put together when they were both working it would probably have come together quicker.
It seems to be a problem in British engineering that in order to get money to develop new technology you have to be revolutionary rather than evolutionary.
Concorde being a classic case with both a revolutionary airframe and new highly stressed engines. The other famous case was the Avro Manchester/Lancaster. As designed the Manchester with two new engines was a flop until fitted with 4 Merlins it became the Lancaster.