I'm sure I read somewhere that Temple Meads to Severn Beach was listed by Thomas Cook as one of the best scenic railway journeys in Europe: there can't be many other journeys of just over 30 minutes where you can see cityscapes, a river gorge, heavy industry and an estuary.
I think the new Severn Beach fares are a good practical system - they're easy to understand, cheap for a day out to England's most unlikely seaside resort, and presumably more fares get collected at busy times because the guard can get through the train faster. Getting a train from Montpelier to Redland is a pretty silly thing to do, so why not have a silly rate per mile!
Absolutely, don't get me wrong. I wasn't suggesting that the Beach line fares are high, quite the contrary: they're great value for money. Like I said, ^1.50 for Clifton Down to Temple Meads in about 15 minutes can't be beat.
Given the nature of this thread, I was just looking for (and found) an example of a silly journey that I don't suppose anyone ever makes that just ends up with a high mile-for-mile cost because of the zonal fares. And getting back to the original topic, apart from the Heathrow to Hayes fares set by BAA, am I still winning for an
FGW▸ -set fare with ^3.24 per mile between Redland and Montpelier?