Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 19:35 08 Jan 2025
 
- Mother 'not surprised' son killed on London bus
* Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger that diverted flight
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
tomorrow - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
8th Jan (1991)
Cannon Street buffer stop collision (link)

Train RunningCancelled
18:51 Evesham to Oxford
19:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:30 Looe to Liskeard
20:05 Liskeard to Looe
20:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 05:57 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 06:30 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 07:20 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 07:54 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 08:30 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 09:05 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 09:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 10:08 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 10:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 11:06 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 11:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 12:08 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
18:26 Exmouth to Paignton
Delayed
17:52 Trowbridge to Great Malvern
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:06 London Paddington to Bedwyn
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 08, 2025, 19:43:37 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[174] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[82] Views sought : how train companies give assistance to disabled...
[69] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[54] senior railcard
[52] Coastal walks - station to station
[28] Rail Replacement bus - OK, but I prefer the train.
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Bad Publicity FGW Strikes Again  (Read 6266 times)
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« on: January 06, 2009, 20:10:57 »

Just had Slough and Royal Borugh Midweek (freebie) drop through door.

Headline,

"It's not Fare"

"Mum's fury as teen left stranded, saying rail staff refused to let her pay for ticket with change"

Staff at Slough allegely refused to accept change for a ^1.90 fare to Windsor. Admittedly 60ps worth of copper plus silver.

Girl had to phone a friend and wait around Slough Station to be picked up.

Mum is quoted further down:

"Since then I have been in touch with Customer Services but they don't seem intersted either."

Apparently FGW (First Great Western) have offered a bunch of flowers to girl.

FGW spokesman said "we are investingating the situation and will respond to the customer as soon as possible." Which is rather limp as it was made two weeks after the incident.

What ever the right and wrongs it doesn't make FGW look too good. Surely FGW should have learnt by now to get onto this sort of thing straight away,  before it hits the front page.

As the girl was only 16 don't FGW staff have a duty of care under Child Protection Legislation?

As an aside what would have happened if you tried to feed 60p in pennies into a ticket machine?
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 06, 2009, 20:17:11 »

As the girl was only 16 don't FGW (First Great Western) staff have a duty of care under Child Protection Legislation?

Isn't 16 old enough to get married? So hardly a child needing protection.
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: January 06, 2009, 20:25:09 »

Maybe you can get married but I thought Child Protection applied to 18.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 06, 2009, 20:50:15 »

If the same happened in a shop would you go to the papers over it. Ridiculous. 16 is old enough to be prepared to look after yourself and if carrying round loads of copper is sensible...
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 06, 2009, 21:04:14 »

Why didn't she go to a shop to exchange the money?

And I don't think FGW (First Great Western) should be responsible either. 16 is old enough.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4496


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 06, 2009, 21:36:00 »

FGW (First Great Western) do not have a duty of care under child protection, as they were unlikely to have put her at risk as she could wait in the safety of the station ticket hall.  Any vendor can refuse your custom, go try and pay for a new car with pound coins.

Although I think it was an unreasonable act by the FGW staff member which I suspect they did not to a) want to carry all that shrapnel around, b) and have to count it at the end of the shift or both.

FGW still have some very surly characters working for them, I notice today a member of FGW staff at a station barrier line trying to talk to a member of the public while still having a scarf wrapped around his mouth bad manor I call that
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
gwr2006
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 137


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 06, 2009, 22:26:09 »

Also remember that in this country, a shop or business is only obliged to accept payment that is legal tender. That is 20p and 50p pieces in amounts up to ^10; 5p and 10p pieces in amounts up to ^5; and 1p and 2p pieces in amounts up to 20p.

If this young adult presented 60p in bronze then the staff member was perfectly entitled to refuse it as it was not legal tender. She was not put at risk as there was a safe place for her to wait.

Having worked on public transport, it was very common for people to hand over handfuls of small value coins to try and get away without paying the proper fare - staff who accept it rarely count every coin but have to make up any shortfall from their own pocket.

Why would anyone carry around that much small change in their pockets!!!
Logged
jester
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 134


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 07, 2009, 00:11:37 »

On board staff are forced to accept this when tendered for ticket puchases on branch lines. I tend to think they offer it on purpose as the poor conductor has'nt got time to check it and cant refuse it either!
Logged
G.Uard
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 426


"Are we at Yate yet?"


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: January 07, 2009, 09:17:53 »

Also remember that in this country, a shop or business is only obliged to accept payment that is legal tender. That is 20p and 50p pieces in amounts up to ^10; 5p and 10p pieces in amounts up to ^5; and 1p and 2p pieces in amounts up to 20p.

If this young adult presented 60p in bronze then the staff member was perfectly entitled to refuse it as it was not legal tender. She was not put at risk as there was a safe place for her to wait.

Having worked on public transport, it was very common for people to hand over handfuls of small value coins to try and get away without paying the proper fare - staff who accept it rarely count every coin but have to make up any shortfall from their own pocket.

Why would anyone carry around that much small change in their pockets!!!

From first hand experience, I know how frustrating a pocketful of coppers can be when offered as payment.  However:-

Whether or not coins, (or Scots banknotes for that matter), have legal tender status, their acceptability as a means of payment is essentially a matter for agreement between the parties involved. Legal tender has a very narrow technical meaning in relation to the settlement of 'debt'. Strictly speaking, the 'debtor' must pay the exact amount owed, change cannot therefore be demanded.  In this context therefore the term ^legal tender^ has very little practical application.
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: January 07, 2009, 10:46:30 »

You are right.  "legal tender" is only a concept that applies to settlement of a debt.  If you are paying at a station or shop you do not have a debt to settle.  The ticket office or shopkeeper isn't obliged to sell you anything and can quite legally refuse as a matter of contract law.  However, refusal might breach other laws for example refusing to sell tickets to black lesbian wheelchair users whould be illegal discrimination inteh provsion of goods or services; and there might be something in the franchise agreement stating that the ticket office is obliged to sell all available tickets to anyone.

I suspect that it all comes down to what is reasonable.  The problem with commenting on things like this is you never have all the facts.  If the tendering was not malitious and hadn't happened before then I suspect that the staff member has being unreasonable.  But why didn't she try the next window or a ticket machine? 
Logged
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2037


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: January 07, 2009, 12:06:47 »

At a municipal pay-and-display car park in Plymouth, I found that a whole day's parking was ^4.90. The machine says "no change given", so most of the time that's effectively ^5. But the nice thing about this machine was that it also had a sign saying "maximum of 30 coins accepted per transaction" - so I assume that someone had decided to annoy it by paying with 49 x 10p.

For complicated reasons, we sampled 3 different car parks that day, and the best one in terms of payment was the FGW (First Great Western) one at the station - which doesn't say much about Plymouth City Council's car parking department.
Logged
kazbear
Full Member
***
Posts: 31


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: January 07, 2009, 15:19:12 »

As she was 16, she would have to pay adult fare.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: January 07, 2009, 16:24:01 »

As she was 16, she would have to pay adult fare.

^2 adult fare so presume it was ^1.90 before fare change.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page