Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 12:15 09 Jan 2025
 
* Manchester Airport reopens runways after snow
* Man with crocodile skull in luggage arrested at Delhi airport
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
9th Jan (2004)
Incorporation of Railway Development Society Ltd (now Railfuture) (link)

Train RunningCancelled
07:40 Penzance to Cardiff Central
11:30 Cardiff Central to Trowbridge
11:39 Weymouth to Frome
12:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
09/01/25 12:08 Looe to Liskeard
12:30 Cardiff Central to Trowbridge
12:54 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
13:20 Frome to Weymouth
Short Run
09:55 Great Malvern to London Paddington
Delayed
09:21 Carmarthen to London Paddington
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:52 London Paddington to Hereford
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 09, 2025, 12:20:53 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[198] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[109] Thumpers for Dummies
[88] Outstanding server / web site issues
[51] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[32] Views sought : how train companies give assistance to disabled...
[32] Rail Replacement bus - OK, but I prefer the train.
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 12
  Print  
Author Topic: Western Rail Access To Heathrow (WRATH) - merged topics  (Read 107462 times)
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6594


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #90 on: March 05, 2013, 00:30:58 »

I think the pax numbers from the West country to Heathrow will be only part of the calculation. There will be opportunities for faster travel to Heathrow from Wales, Oxford, even the likes of Birmingham. Although I have flown from Heathrow on holiday a couple of times, it is seen primarily as the departure point for those carrying a briefcase rather than a bucket and spade, and the quality of traveller is likely to have some impact, as well as the quantity. It will also have some impact on the number of passengers travelling between Reading and Paddington, as anyone from west of there heading for LHR will have a choice other than bus or Paddington then back by HEX.

It is not only air passengers who will benefit. I have read that more people work in Heathrow than in the entire city of Newcastle. That may be apocryphal, but Heathrow has around 70,000 employees including franchises, not all of whom live in nearby Staines. When this scheme is operational, it will provide extra direct services from Woking and Bracknell, as well as Waterloo, Clapham Jct, Guildford, and a few other places. In short, it will link a major employment zone with several high-density residential areas, some of which are not easily accessed by public transport, as well as connecting the west to Heathrow. In terms of benefit cost ratio, it will score highly. The new infrastructure will be following existing very busy roads (mainly the M25) or be underground. No outstanding beauty issues have been identified. Some level crossings will be closed more than now however, and the consultation has addressed that point, if not resolved it.

This could be a situation where the skills of the demographist and the statistician prove to be crucial, and possibly more important than those of the civil engineer. There may also be development effects along the routes concerned, and my guess is that this development will be followed by universities, to inform future opinion.

I don't think the value of this project is influenced to any great degree by the Heathrow / Boris Island argument. My own thinking is that the Boris island idea is a goer, and that Heathrow should not have survived the 1950s, but that major infrastructure decisions are seldom driven by anything other than the potents for the  next election. We are therefore stuck with the imperfect Heathrow for many years. A  western rail link will ameliorate the problems that causes. Or solves.
Logged

Now, please!
Andrew1939 from West Oxon
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 535


View Profile Email
« Reply #91 on: March 05, 2013, 16:20:25 »

Heathrow workers live over a wide area but the further away from Heathrow, the numbers fall. Here in Hanborough I know someone who works at Heathrow (reason: housing much more affordable). However he travels to and from work by private car and says that it is relatively quick as he works permanent nightshifts on aircraft maintenance leaving Hanborough for work around mid evening and returning home early morning when the heavy trafic flows are in the other direction.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4496


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #92 on: March 05, 2013, 17:01:07 »

There would be uproar from the taxi drivers in the Maidenhead area when the western rail connection is made, they thrive on the fact the buses are pants almost 2 hours and the current rail journey is a pain with the over bridge interchange at Hayes where there is no lifts to help with luggage.

There does not need to be passenger numbers to justify it the creation of new journey opportunities is also a perfectly acceptable case for the DfT» (Department for Transport - about)
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #93 on: March 05, 2013, 23:42:08 »

It will also give extra capacity between Hayes and Langley a couple of Crossrail trains going via the Airport can be overtaken by Padd Reading Semis on the Relief line.

One point what will the fare be? Will there be a stupidly excessive  add on like Hayes to Heathrow on the Connect. Presuambly passnegers will be able to catch trains from Langley and westwards going via the airport at the same price as along the main line. Just a thought!
 
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13028


View Profile Email
« Reply #94 on: March 06, 2013, 09:33:28 »

Doubt it - the infrastructure in place from the Airport to Airport Junction is owned by the airport operator, not NR» (Network Rail - home page).
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #95 on: March 06, 2013, 09:45:39 »

Doubt it - the infrastructure in place from the Airport to Airport Junction is owned by the airport operator, not NR» (Network Rail - home page).

What a crazy world we live in!
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10362


View Profile
« Reply #96 on: March 06, 2013, 10:30:36 »

Doubt it - the infrastructure in place from the Airport to Airport Junction is owned by the airport operator, not NR» (Network Rail - home page).

Might that situation change should this through link get built though?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13028


View Profile Email
« Reply #97 on: March 06, 2013, 10:40:06 »

Why should it - I bet they're making good money....
Logged
swrural
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 647


View Profile
« Reply #98 on: March 06, 2013, 10:54:02 »

I looked up a fare.  ^5.60 for 4 kms as the crow flies.  ^1.40 per mile, correct me if I am wrong.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10362


View Profile
« Reply #99 on: March 06, 2013, 11:07:34 »

Because the nature of the service will be completely different.  The present structure was determined when all that would operate is a designated Heathrow Express link operated by BAA.  As a through service will presumably be operating when the western link is operational, then BAA will not be operating those services (again presumably) and I can see the link becoming more of a proper National Rail route and then it would make sense for Network Rail to take over full responsibility for it - after all, they might not own it, but they do still maintain it.

Either that, or you have a high surcharge for travelling on a through service from, say Slough to Ealing Broadway that goes via the airport (can't see that happening), or you only pay the surcharge if your journey is actually to/from one of the airport stations.

Personally, I can see BAA being 'persuaded' to give up Heathrow Express operation and hand it over to the National Rail network when this link goes live.  There are already murmurings of significant changes to the HEx services as a result of Crossrail.  
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13028


View Profile Email
« Reply #100 on: March 06, 2013, 11:10:54 »

When does the HEx contract expire with NR» (Network Rail - home page)?
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #101 on: March 06, 2013, 11:25:51 »

HEx track access expires in 2023 I believe, from memory of a discussion somewhere last year.  About 10 more years anyway.
 
There are a number of different options for the mid '20s covering Heathrow in the London ands SE RUS (Route Utilisation Strategy), including for example a maximum of 10 tph from Crossrail subsuming both HEx and Connect.  Western Access is also considered, with as many as 8 through trains.  Too much to repeat here really...

Paul

Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10362


View Profile
« Reply #102 on: March 06, 2013, 11:31:45 »

HEx track access expires in 2023 I believe, from memory of a discussion somewhere last year.  About 10 more years anyway.

Perfect timing?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13028


View Profile Email
« Reply #103 on: March 06, 2013, 11:33:29 »

That's why I asked the Q....
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #104 on: March 06, 2013, 12:06:20 »

If the length of the original TAA was intended to give them enough time (25 years from '98?) to cover most of their capital costs of the airport branch and tunnels, perhaps it's all been part of an overall cunning plan anyway...

Paul
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 12
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page