Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 14:15 08 Apr 2025
 
* Titanic scan reveals ground-breaking details of ship's final hours
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 15/04/25 - End, Rail Future consultation
15/04/25 - Everything Electric
16/04/25 - Walk from Chetnole
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury

On this day
8th Apr (1982)
XPT passenger trains enter service in Australia (link)

Train RunningCancelled
12:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
13:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
14:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
14:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
16:00 Oxford to London Paddington
23:33 Reading to Gatwick Airport
Short Run
10:52 Plymouth to Cardiff Central
11:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
19:28 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
21:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Westbury
09/04/25 20:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2025-04-06 Do you hold a senior railcard?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 08, 2025, 14:15:38 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[233] Thoughts on person being taken ill near (Trowbridge) Station
[88] Ticket offices - changes afoot?
[66] Daily Mile - coming to Melksham for April
[46] March 27th 2pm - Better Rail for Less Congestion and New Housi...
[34] How do I reserve a seat on a Cross Country train with an Inter...
[32] [otd] 8th April 1982 - High Speed Train enters traffic in Aust...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 13
  Print  
Author Topic: Loco hauled  (Read 75914 times)
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #135 on: February 05, 2009, 19:02:33 »

And slow down already slow Torbay trains!
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43766



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #136 on: February 05, 2009, 19:08:33 »

for once i was messing around... was anyone else being serious?

There's many a true word spoken in jest.   There *is* a TransWilts traffic / case from Yeovil and Frome up to Chippenham and Swindon (the Yeovil / Frome being arguable against Salisbury and Warminster origins, and depending on excellent connections from those palces at Westbury). 

Whether it's as part of a through service and a longer train, or more local, isn't wildly going to effect the revenue flow from the TransWilts segment.  I can tell you that there's a remarkably high proportion of through traffic (or has been historically) on certain trains, whereas others had a very high proportion locally - so there are two markets ... with some of the longer distant ones not being too route specific.  I can tell you that give a couple of years of reliable service and a timetable like the '08 draft, the 153 might be getting rather busy  Grin

To add another iron into the fire.  From Swindon, carry on to Oxford - sort out another market / traffic that has been seriously degraded in recent years.  But - please - many of these options would be longer term and the crying need is to deal with the Trowbridge to Swindon, the Chippenham to Salisbury, and the Melksham to anywhere traffic
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #137 on: February 05, 2009, 19:12:52 »

yeovil could be better utilized, if the link between junction and pen mill was more subsantial and if there was a down cord from junction to weymouth...

with the improvements at axminster and increased frequency im sure you will see traffic increasing on this route... infact when i go to yeovil the only off putting thing for me reguarding getting the train is that it isnt anywhere near town !! grr is pen mill closer?
Logged
thetrout
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2612



View Profile
« Reply #138 on: February 06, 2009, 17:07:08 »

To add another iron into the fire.  From Swindon, carry on to Oxford - sort out another market / traffic that has been seriously degraded in recent years.  But - please - many of these options would be longer term and the crying need is to deal with the Trowbridge to Swindon, the Chippenham to Salisbury, and the Melksham to anywhere traffic

I agree with you. Although the current service is inadequete. I would see more demand from Frome. When I went to college, I lived in Frome. The course I wanted to do was only available at Chippenham at a 9:00 start. Guess What, The first bus for chippenham from Frome didn't get me there anywhere near on time.

However. If you had a service that ran from Frome direct to Chippenham. College students wanting to get to the Chippenham Campus can actually get there for the start of their course. Although some people may say do the course at Trowbridge, That's not always an option because some courses especially IT & Media/Music are only available at Chippenham.

If you had a route from say Taunton - Swindon. The demand for such a service would exist. also if you could offer cheaper season tickets than First Buses or FGW (First Great Western), then you would see those trains quickly fill up. A LHCS (Locomotive Hauled Coaching Stock) of 4 Carriages maybe hauled by a Class 37/47/57 or even a 67 would be most appropriate.
Logged

Grin Grin Grin Grin
anthony215
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1319


View Profile Email
« Reply #139 on: September 29, 2010, 21:41:51 »

Just had word from a freind who works for FGW (First Great Western) and have also read the same thing on the WNXX (Stored Unserviceable, Mainline Locos HQ All Classes) forum that FGW are to withdraw the paignton loco hauled set at the end of this week.

At the moment i have been told  by my freind that the other loco hauled diagram could continue to at least   2011
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19488



View Profile Email
« Reply #140 on: September 29, 2010, 21:49:52 »

This story has also been mentioned before, on another board: see http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=7531.msg75744#msg75744  Smiley
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post - a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London, depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #141 on: September 30, 2010, 00:17:14 »

we were also meant to get some of the 150/1's this week from London Overground but I believe this has been put back by a few days so the LHCS (Locomotive Hauled Coaching Stock) may stay for another week or two.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #142 on: September 30, 2010, 00:32:52 »

Glad I travelled on it last week before I moved out of the area  Grin
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10442


View Profile
« Reply #143 on: September 30, 2010, 12:16:04 »

we were also meant to get some of the 150/1's this week from London Overground but I believe this has been put back by a few days so the LHCS (Locomotive Hauled Coaching Stock) may stay for another week or two.

I spent some of yesterday afternoon travelling on the Gospel Oak to Barking route and there wasn't a 172 to be seen, just 3 of the 150's plying the route.  That may have changed when the 15-minute frequencies started in the peak, but I couldn't wait that long.  It does show that the 150's are still very much needed though!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13288


View Profile Email
« Reply #144 on: September 30, 2010, 12:26:10 »

That route is the last to get 172s - sometime soon....
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10442


View Profile
« Reply #145 on: September 30, 2010, 12:50:14 »

Not sure what you mean?  It's the first to get the 172's isn't it?  Followed by Chiltern and London Midland's orders.  Class 172's have in fact been working that route for several months, but design problems have led to them not replacing the 150's as quickly as hoped.  With none of them working off-peak yesterday it reinforced what 'vacman' said about further delays in the 150's transfer to FGW (First Great Western).
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #146 on: September 30, 2010, 12:57:43 »

Not sure what you mean?  It's the first to get the 172's isn't it?  Followed by Chiltern and London Midland's orders.  Class 172's have in fact been working that route for several months, but design problems have led to them not replacing the 150's as quickly as hoped.  With none of them working off-peak yesterday it reinforced what 'vacman' said about further delays in the 150's transfer to FGW (First Great Western).
We should have all the LO units by early next year but two or three are due to come asap.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5345


View Profile
« Reply #147 on: September 30, 2010, 13:35:42 »

Not sure what you mean?  It's the first to get the 172's isn't it?  Followed by Chiltern and London Midland's orders.  Class 172's have in fact been working that route for several months, but design problems have led to them not replacing the 150's as quickly as hoped.  With none of them working off-peak yesterday it reinforced what 'vacman' said about further delays in the 150's transfer to FGW (First Great Western).

Definitely the first (and only LO) route to get 172s, but there have been reports elsewhere that 3 of LO's units have gone back to Derby a week or so ago. Pure speculation on my part, but after the recent rail mag articles saying that they don't need their exhausts completely rerouting, but only some minor mods are needed, perhaps LO are having theirs done while they still have the 150s to avoid hassle later?

Paul

Logged
anthony215
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1319


View Profile Email
« Reply #148 on: October 02, 2010, 13:02:29 »

Had an email from one of my freinds who is working for FGW (First Great Western) and have also read this on WNXX (Stored Unserviceable, Mainline Locos HQ All Classes) that the  FGW Loco hauled trains are set to continue for at least a few more weeks/months til London Overground release  their class 150's.

Logged
qwerty
Full Member
***
Posts: 74


View Profile
« Reply #149 on: October 05, 2010, 13:47:57 »

Had an email from one of my freinds who is working for FGW (First Great Western) and have also read this on WNXX (Stored Unserviceable, Mainline Locos HQ All Classes) that the  FGW Loco hauled trains are set to continue for at least a few more weeks/months til London Overground release  their class 150's.
Staff have been told that DBS» (Deutsch Bahn Schenker - UK (United Kingdom) website) are on a rolling 1 week contract now for provision of one of the loco hauled sets. So it could stop quite abruptly.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 13
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page