Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 06:35 08 Jan 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
tomorrow - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
8th Jan (1991)
Cannon Street buffer stop collision (link)

Train RunningCancelled
05:57 Liskeard to Looe
06:20 Windsor & Eton Central to Slough
06:30 Looe to Liskeard
06:40 Windsor & Eton Central to Slough
07:20 Liskeard to Looe
07:54 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
05:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 08, 2025, 06:44:09 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[192] Coastal walks - station to station
[169] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[74] Fatal Oxfordshire train crash remembered 150 years on
[67] Warnings of snow, wind and rain across the UK for New Year
[45] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[34] Senior Railcard - ongoing issues, merged posts
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 26 27 [28] 29 30 ... 112
  Print  
Author Topic: Cotswold Line redoubling: 2008 - 2011  (Read 707147 times)
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19081


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #405 on: July 29, 2009, 23:41:01 »

Yes: thanks very much for posting here, willc - as well as writing for your day job!  Wink
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #406 on: July 30, 2009, 00:03:24 »

Reason I was puzzled by the position of the relaid track is that on the right you have that row of wooden pegs, which elsewhere seem to be being used as markers for the edge of the formation when ballast is being dropped and spread, which would make it a tight fit for the second track, but I guess they know what they are doing.

I would expect that relay room and similar structures elsewhere in the formation will disappear imminently, as the idea is to move everything out of the way this summer, ahead of the track relaying. There may be fewer obvious signs of their efforts on the ground but there are lot of signalling technicians at work all along the route as well this week, as Don found at Ascott, as part of this process of sweeping the trackbed clean.
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #407 on: July 31, 2009, 00:17:25 »

Couple of variations of my story have now seen the light of day:

http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/4521097.Cotswold_Line_revamp_takes_shape/

http://www.cotswoldjournal.co.uk/search/4520413.Work_is_underway_on_Brunel___s_tunnel/

And some more pictures - including the repositioning of that track between Charlbury and Ascott-under-Wychwood and Chipping Campden tunnel - now at http://www.flickr.com/photos/willc2009/
« Last Edit: July 31, 2009, 00:36:24 by willc » Logged
IndustryInsider
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10361


View Profile
« Reply #408 on: July 31, 2009, 10:38:42 »

Some good pictures, Will. And a well written article - like the way you've dumbed down 'ballast' to 'stone chippings'!

I've not had chance to get to see the work in progress at all, but I was at Oxford yesterday for a couple of hours and was fairly impressed with the level or organisation there with regard to the buses. The short-stay car park has been blocked off for the duration, with a small section of the long-stay car park converted into short-stay and disabled parking. Whilst the car park was nearly full, there were a dozen or so spaces available at around 4pm (I had heard that there were problems with spaces).

There is professional looking temporary signage on the platforms directing people to the buses, as well as by the bus loading area as well, with posters giving specific calling points and timings of each bus. Buses are appearing on the CIS (Customer Information System) and also being announced automatically - taking a lot of pressure off of the staff. In terms of loadings on the buses, I didn't see any arrivals, but the three separate buses that are replacing the evening halts service all left about 50-75% full, indicating that FGW (First Great Western) have provided plenty of capacity. Much better to have spare spaces rather than having to sort out taxis, etc. Plenty of staff were on hand to help.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #409 on: July 31, 2009, 16:25:59 »

Good to see the interesting historical perspective - I'd read about this battle but never realised it was the Cotswold line!
Logged
autotank
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 241


View Profile
« Reply #410 on: July 31, 2009, 16:43:10 »

Great article - do you know where I can read more about the battle?

Sounds like they are really cracking on with the work. Roll on 2011!
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19081


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #411 on: July 31, 2009, 21:04:59 »

There's a lot of interesting information about the 'Battle of Mickleton' at http://www.ampneycrucis.f9.co.uk/PARK/MickletonTunnel.htm  Wink
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #412 on: July 31, 2009, 21:53:10 »

I think FGW (First Great Western) are to be congratulated on the way the bus operation has been handled. I've not heard a whisper of adverse comment, other than some minor concerns about coaches using a narrow street in Charlbury that the local bus services avoid, which I think reflects the meticulous way it has been handled.

Casual observation of replacement coaches I have encountered doing the drive to and from Oxford suggests they are running to the timetable - eg three of the four 18.25 departures running nose to tail up the Botley Road out of Oxford the other evening - and staff provision has been exemplary, with someone on duty at Moreton-in-Marsh on Sunday (normally an unstaffed day). The other morning I even drove past a yellow tabarded member of FGW staff at a layby on the A44 just east of Moreton waiting with a passenger - not sure why, maybe they had boarded the wrong bus - but hard to beat for customer care.

Some of the buses are definitely lightly loaded - Phil Haigh of Rail magazine travelled up to the tunnel visit on a mid-morning bus from Oxford and told me there were five people on a 50-seater - but at busier times many more are travelling and people are being delivered throughout the day where they want to go as efficiently as possible, given the limitations of many of the roads once you're off the A44.

Chris has highlighted the best web source of material about the 'Battle of Mickleton'. As for books, John Boynton's Oxford Worcester and Wolverhampton Railway has a thorough account, as part of a comprehensive book on the entire route, though the Cotswolds, Vale and on into the Black Country, well worth tracking down if you want to know more about the line.

The Worcester News variation on a theme is at http://www.worcesternews.co.uk/features/4523401.Tunnel_prepares_for_next_phase_of_its_life/
« Last Edit: July 31, 2009, 22:00:11 by willc » Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #413 on: August 03, 2009, 22:20:56 »

Although it is true that progress between Ascott and Charlbury is at a fairly stately pace at present on the relaid track - 40-50mph - I really can't see the point of tinkering with the usual departure times from Moreton because there is plenty of time in hand with the regular timing allowances past Hanborough.

The 10.45 today was held at Kingham for ages while someone ran up and down the car park to put a ticket in a car and then came over the bridge, we then left Charlbury four down but would still have been in Oxford at 10.25, two minutes early, except we were held at the last signal - presumably a late XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) was still in the platform.

Out on the ground, there is a double-width ballast bed (and second set of rails dropped) most of the way between Charlbury and the Chadlington-Leafield road bridge where I took the pictures but beyond there to Ascott I presume it will be coming later. At Charlbury station there are some excavators working and lots of drain components and pipes waiting to go in.
« Last Edit: August 03, 2009, 22:54:03 by willc » Logged
Oxman
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 423


View Profile
« Reply #414 on: August 03, 2009, 22:51:32 »

Whilst it is true that quite a few of the Moreton departures have time in hand before reaching Wolvercote, there are some that don't, and must hit Oxford right time to fit into the Oxford - Padd timetable. I understand there is a plan of which services can be held (and for how long), awaiting coach connections, and which must go on time.

As you would expect, really!

It seemed to run fairly well today. Arrivals from Oxford at Moreton have to shunt from the down to the up platform at the London end of the station (its usually done at the country end). Takes about 20 mins for an HST (High Speed Train) to complete this, with the driver changing ends twice. A walking route has been laid to allow this to be done safely.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10361


View Profile
« Reply #415 on: August 03, 2009, 23:09:28 »

It seemed to run fairly well today.

It did. It's a bit tight in the morning with all of the peak trains (4 HST (High Speed Train)'s and a Turbo) having to travel down empty from Old Oak Common or Reading before the first of them makes the return trip. Squeezing the Turbo through caused a ten minute delay to the first up train at Ascott, and I wouldn't be surprised to see that train knocked by a few minutes most mornings - but overall that's not too bad!

A shame that the 'special dispensation' accorded to Evesham whereby a train is able to depart with passengers on under the Semaphore shunting signals from the same platform it arrived on, can't apply at Moreton too. A late HST arrival might unnecessarily delay its return working by the time 20 minutes has been wasted on shunting it across.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #416 on: August 03, 2009, 23:34:54 »

Whilst it is true that quite a few of the Moreton departures have time in hand before reaching Wolvercote, there are some that don't, and must hit Oxford right time to fit into the Oxford - Padd timetable. I understand there is a plan of which services can be held (and for how long), awaiting coach connections, and which must go on time.

As you would expect, really!

Yes, well, there's time in hand and then there's FGW (First Great Western) padding. That 10.45 train I was on still stood for three or four minutes at Oxford waiting departure and when the 10.48 is operated normally by a Turbo (it's an HST (High Speed Train) for the next three weeks) and gets a clear run into Oxford it can end up standing for eight or nine.

The 7.07 is allowed 43 minutes to make Oxford with three stops on the way on the temporary timings. Why? Even under normal circumstances it gets a leisurely 40 minutes for a trip that is timed at 36-37 for pretty much every other train all day. Take out the four minutes or so that we lost at Kingham today and we would have hit the 36 or 37-minute mark into Oxford - allegedly slow-accelerating HST and the TSR (Temporary Speed Restriction) notwithstanding. With fully-fettled track and a determined driver, a two-stop Moreton-Oxford HST run in 25-26 minutes is possible - I've been on trains that did it.

The only day there is likely to be a problem with coach connections is Tuesday, when it is Moreton-in-Marsh market day and the traffic queues through town can be lengthy at this time of the year, but with a 35-minute allowance for a non-stop bus from Evesham, there is a good margin in hand.
Logged
Oxman
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 423


View Profile
« Reply #417 on: August 04, 2009, 00:01:24 »

There is a dispensation at Moreton for late running trains to depart from the down platform. but this requires the signaller to clip the points.

Yes, the time allowed from Evesham to Moreton is usually generous, but proved challenging this afternoon when the bus had to follow a combined harvestet for some distance.

Ah, the pleasures of the countryside.
Logged
Mookiemoo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3117


View Profile Email
« Reply #418 on: August 04, 2009, 00:05:43 »

There is a dispensation at Moreton for late running trains to depart from the down platform. but this requires the signaller to clip the points.

Yes, the time allowed from Evesham to Moreton is usually generous, but proved challenging this afternoon when the bus had to follow a combined harvestet for some distance.

Ah, the pleasures of the countryside.

But by the laws of the road - if that combine had five or more vehicles behind it it should have pulled over to let them past - highway code (well was when I learned - I dont think they specify five anymore!)

I live in a rural area and I flame the farmers that dont do this
Logged

Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."

"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #419 on: August 04, 2009, 00:31:56 »

There is a dispensation at Moreton for late running trains to depart from the down platform. but this requires the signaller to clip the points.

Yes, the time allowed from Evesham to Moreton is usually generous, but proved challenging this afternoon when the bus had to follow a combined harvestet for some distance.

Ah, the pleasures of the countryside.

And i bet that procedure, once you've called control, etc, takes almost as long as turning back an HST (High Speed Train).

Hopefully, the resignalling budget will stretch to a proper turnback facility for platform 1 at Moreton, saving at least some of the time all this takes.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 26 27 [28] 29 30 ... 112
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page