grahame
|
|
« on: September 20, 2008, 19:45:12 » |
|
OK - it's NOT FGW▸ served, and I don't think that anyone's going to have a cat in h**l chance of placing this without some clues .... but I'm giving it a go for a day or so. Then the clues will start.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
welshman
|
|
« Reply #1 on: September 20, 2008, 20:36:48 » |
|
Frogland?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Phil
|
|
« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2008, 09:34:22 » |
|
Looks Austrian to me
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2008, 13:39:01 » |
|
Two creditable attempts - thanks, gents. You're right to suggest that its not in the UK▸ , but the countries you have chosen aren't actually the right one(s) and they don't share borders with the right one either
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
eightf48544
|
|
« Reply #4 on: September 21, 2008, 14:17:37 » |
|
Commonwealth (Canada or Australia) or US?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #5 on: September 21, 2008, 14:46:54 » |
|
Commonwealth (Canada or Australia) or US?
The location even has a British name ...
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #6 on: September 21, 2008, 14:50:21 » |
|
New Melksham?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #7 on: September 21, 2008, 15:10:52 » |
|
New Melksham?
Curiously, "Melksham" is one of the very few British place names that does NOT seem to have been reused overseas. I am told that this is because: a) People who live in Melksham are very happy there and don't WANT to set up colonies b) The train service is so cr*p that they can't actually get out of the town even if they want to It could also be - let's face it - because: c) The folks from Melksham haven't exactly been "get up and go / act" types - something the DfT» rather relied on when they slashed the TransWilts service d) It's a peculiar name!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #8 on: September 22, 2008, 01:27:37 » |
|
Commonwealth (Canada or Australia) or US?
Perhaps I should add that one of those IS right ...
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #9 on: September 22, 2008, 04:45:57 » |
|
Commonwealth (Canada or Australia) or US?
The location even has a British name ... British Columbia?
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
G.Uard
|
|
« Reply #10 on: September 22, 2008, 06:40:21 » |
|
Victoria?
|
|
« Last Edit: September 22, 2008, 06:43:33 by G.Uard »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
eightf48544
|
|
« Reply #11 on: September 22, 2008, 10:05:45 » |
|
If we knew where grahame went on holiday it might give us a clue.
I'm tending towards Australia, but may be wrong.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #12 on: September 22, 2008, 12:27:23 » |
|
If we knew where grahame went on holiday it might give us a clue.
I'm tending towards Australia, but may be wrong.
The picture was taken within the last few days, and the time where I am located at the moment is 07:27
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
eightf48544
|
|
« Reply #13 on: September 22, 2008, 12:35:44 » |
|
Canada or US?
Go for US because of the fences but then again the telegraph poles could be Canada.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #14 on: September 22, 2008, 16:31:32 » |
|
Its on the east coast of America then.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|