Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:55 09 Jan 2025
 
* Airport closes runways due to heavy snow
- Mother 'not surprised' son killed on London bus
- Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
- Fake Aldi map prank wreaks 'havoc' on village
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
9th Jan (2004)
Incorporation of Railway Development Society Ltd (now Railfuture) (link)

Train RunningCancelled
09/01/25 09:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 10:08 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 10:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 11:06 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 11:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 12:08 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
09:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
09:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
09:55 Great Malvern to London Paddington
10:20 Trowbridge to Cardiff Central
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 09, 2025, 10:13:16 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[224] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[99] Outstanding server / web site issues
[58] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[56] Thumpers for Dummies
[36] Views sought : how train companies give assistance to disabled...
[36] Rail Replacement bus - OK, but I prefer the train.
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Broken HSTs?  (Read 4597 times)
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« on: September 03, 2008, 01:15:48 »

Anyone know if there is some shortage of serviceable HSTs (High Speed Train) at the moment? I ask because the 17.51 from London to Worcester was a 166 last Friday and again Monday and Tuesday this week.

Website has used the earlier train failure excuse every time, but in that case, where the hell are the 180s? Each of the three mornings, I have seen a 2x180 combo (104 and 105) roll into Oxford ecs to work the 10.30 to London. Even allowing for one set being off on a Hereford working for the afternoon, that would still appear to leave at least one working Adelante available at Old Oak, so unless each of these failures has happened in a tiny time frame, just before 17.51 without time to call up a 180, what's going on?

Doesn't exactly augur well for next summer, with the 180s gone and a single HST coming in their place, especially if the Turbos are in the middle of being refreshed as well, with a depleted fleet as a result. But then if the Cotswold Line is blockaded, I suppose I may not have a train to worry about anyway...
Logged
Steve44
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 100

I quite like thames turbos...


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 03, 2008, 18:35:27 »

Same again today it would seem will. Also worth noting that the 15.33 Hereford - Pad service terminated at Reading after a train fault it was Down 52 minutes from Oxford Thus the 18.51 Pad - Oxford Service will start at Reading also.  I bet the 19.48 Cheltenham Service will be a tad busier than normal.
Logged
redskin125
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 20


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 03, 2008, 19:00:09 »

Both Cl.180's have been planned to work all day since going into the high summer period of the timetable. That leaves one Cl.180 under maintenance at Old Oak Common. The problems towards the end of last week were due to traincrew not being able to drive an HST (High Speed Train).
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 03, 2008, 22:54:46 »

Yes, day four of Turbo operation on the 17.51, and a tatty three-car 165 this time. Probably be down to a 2-car by the end of the week at this rate, reviving memories of the worst days of last autumn and winter. So much for inter-city standard rolling stock on most Cotswold Line trains.

The problems towards the end of last week were due to traincrew not being able to drive an HST (High Speed Train).

But the official website excuse every day has been train failures, not lack of crew, so which is it?
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 04, 2008, 21:59:28 »

Why can't FGW (First Great Western) do what Virgin did, and get a loco haul set to act as a back-up?
Logged
IanL
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 348


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 05, 2008, 08:57:46 »

The Paddington-Worcester train tuesday pm 2nd Sept departing Oxford 1449 was a broken HST (High Speed Train), it limped into Oxford 35min late on one engine, replaced by another HST set to continue the journey, at least they didnt terminate the train as this is the only one in a bigh timetable mid afternoon gap.
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: September 05, 2008, 10:31:26 »

Why can't FGW (First Great Western) do what Virgin did, and get a loco haul set to act as a back-up?

Basically because FGW has missed the boat and all the decent loco hauled stock has been grabbed by other TOCs (Train Operating Company). I'm not sure regular users would like some of the Mark1 charter stock which may be availble, even though there is table for every set of seats in standard. One problem is that it has door locking but not CDL (Central Door Locking), each door has a garden shed type bolt!
« Last Edit: September 05, 2008, 15:25:16 by eightf48544 » Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: September 05, 2008, 17:09:34 »

Why can't FGW (First Great Western) do what Virgin did, and get a loco haul set to act as a back-up?

Because it costs a lot more money than simply short forming a service. Common sense would prevail and use the Turbo!
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: September 05, 2008, 20:18:47 »

But to a company that makes so much profit, the comfort of their passengers should be a factor.

What about mark 2s at Honeybourne?
Logged
dog box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 653


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: September 06, 2008, 08:42:09 »

Fgw only have a handfull of driver/guards who actually sign loco hauled stock now....so a loco hauled set is really a non starter
Logged

All postings reflect my own personal views and opinions and are not intended to be, nor should be taken as official statements of first great western or first group policy
super tm
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 599


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: September 06, 2008, 11:27:56 »

No all of the Exeter Drivers and Guards (HSS (High Speed Services)) sign Loco & Coaches as well as about 40 drivers at Padd.  This is because the sleepers have coaching stock as well.

Most of the Guards at Plymouth and Penzance also sign and would only take a few weeks to re train HSS guards at Paddington as the difference between the knowledge required for HST (High Speed Train) and loco and coaches is not great.
Logged
dog box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 653


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: September 07, 2008, 17:44:19 »

are you sure ALL Exeter crews sign Loco hauled stock?? even the regional crews..even if they all did the only work is the sleepers and with the 40 PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains) crews you mention it would be near impossible to keep up your competances
Logged

All postings reflect my own personal views and opinions and are not intended to be, nor should be taken as official statements of first great western or first group policy
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: September 08, 2008, 09:43:14 »

Received a response from FGW (First Great Western) customer services today, which does indeed put the blame down " a number of HST (High Speed Train) problems".
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page